Why do we have the kidney allocation system we have today? A history of the 2014 kidney allocation system

Mark D Stegall; Peter G. Stock; Kenneth Andreoni; John J. Friedewald; Alan B. Leichtman

doi:10.1016/j.humimm.2016.08.008

Why do we have the kidney allocation system we have today? A history of the 2014 kidney allocation system

Mark D Stegall, Peter G. Stock, Kenneth Andreoni, John J. Friedewald, Alan B. Leichtman

Transplant Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

. Those who do not know the past are destined to repeat it.The current system for the allocation of deceased donor kidneys that was implemented in December 2014 (termed the kidney allocation system (KAS)) was the culmination of a decade-long process. Thus, many people involved in transplantation today may not be aware of the underlying concepts and early debates that resulted in KAS. Others who were involved might not remember the details (or have chosen to forget). The goal of this manuscript is to outline the history of the process in order to shed light on why KAS has its current format.

Original language	English (US)
Journal	Human Immunology
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2016.08.008
State	Accepted/In press - Jul 13 2016

Keywords

Deceased donor kidney
Deceased donor kidney allocation
Kidney transplantation
Kidney trasplant outcomes
OPTN
Organ allocation policy
UNOS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Immunology and Allergy
Immunology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.humimm.2016.08.008

Cite this

@article{ddf1821aba4a4b0393efebff02e0ccd2,

title = "Why do we have the kidney allocation system we have today? A history of the 2014 kidney allocation system",

abstract = ". Those who do not know the past are destined to repeat it.The current system for the allocation of deceased donor kidneys that was implemented in December 2014 (termed the kidney allocation system (KAS)) was the culmination of a decade-long process. Thus, many people involved in transplantation today may not be aware of the underlying concepts and early debates that resulted in KAS. Others who were involved might not remember the details (or have chosen to forget). The goal of this manuscript is to outline the history of the process in order to shed light on why KAS has its current format.",

keywords = "Deceased donor kidney, Deceased donor kidney allocation, Kidney transplantation, Kidney trasplant outcomes, OPTN, Organ allocation policy, UNOS",

author = "Stegall, {Mark D} and Stock, {Peter G.} and Kenneth Andreoni and Friedewald, {John J.} and Leichtman, {Alan B.}",

year = "2016",

month = jul,

day = "13",

doi = "10.1016/j.humimm.2016.08.008",

language = "English (US)",

journal = "Human Immunology",

issn = "0198-8859",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why do we have the kidney allocation system we have today? A history of the 2014 kidney allocation system

AU - Stegall, Mark D

AU - Stock, Peter G.

AU - Andreoni, Kenneth

AU - Friedewald, John J.

AU - Leichtman, Alan B.

PY - 2016/7/13

Y1 - 2016/7/13

N2 - . Those who do not know the past are destined to repeat it.The current system for the allocation of deceased donor kidneys that was implemented in December 2014 (termed the kidney allocation system (KAS)) was the culmination of a decade-long process. Thus, many people involved in transplantation today may not be aware of the underlying concepts and early debates that resulted in KAS. Others who were involved might not remember the details (or have chosen to forget). The goal of this manuscript is to outline the history of the process in order to shed light on why KAS has its current format.

AB - . Those who do not know the past are destined to repeat it.The current system for the allocation of deceased donor kidneys that was implemented in December 2014 (termed the kidney allocation system (KAS)) was the culmination of a decade-long process. Thus, many people involved in transplantation today may not be aware of the underlying concepts and early debates that resulted in KAS. Others who were involved might not remember the details (or have chosen to forget). The goal of this manuscript is to outline the history of the process in order to shed light on why KAS has its current format.

KW - Deceased donor kidney

KW - Deceased donor kidney allocation

KW - Kidney transplantation

KW - Kidney trasplant outcomes

KW - OPTN

KW - Organ allocation policy

KW - UNOS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995460983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995460983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.08.008

DO - 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.08.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 27554430

AN - SCOPUS:84995460983

SN - 0198-8859

JO - Human Immunology

JF - Human Immunology

ER -

Why do we have the kidney allocation system we have today? A history of the 2014 kidney allocation system

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this