Who's up first? Testing for order effects in structured interviews using a counterbalanced experimental design

Peter S. Jensen, Henry K. Watanabe, John E. Richters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that, apart from the wording of specific questions, various aspects of the interview process itself may affect the reliability of information provided by research participants. To examine whether the order of presentation of specific diagnostic modules affects the likelihood of subjects' yes/no responses within the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC), the authors used a counterbalanced design, presenting two DISC diagnostic modules to children and their parents in standard or reversed order. Results indicate that the order of module administration exerts effects on the total numbers of symptoms endorsed, level of impairment, and the likelihood of meeting diagnostic criteria, regardless of whether the information is provided by parent or child respondents. Future child and adult assessment measures should take these difficulties fully into account through novel approaches to instrument design and interview procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)439-445
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Volume27
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research Design
Interviews
Appointments and Schedules
Research
Parents

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Diagnosis
  • Diagnostic interviews
  • DISC
  • Reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Who's up first? Testing for order effects in structured interviews using a counterbalanced experimental design. / Jensen, Peter S.; Watanabe, Henry K.; Richters, John E.

In: Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 6, 1999, p. 439-445.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jensen, Peter S. ; Watanabe, Henry K. ; Richters, John E. / Who's up first? Testing for order effects in structured interviews using a counterbalanced experimental design. In: Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 1999 ; Vol. 27, No. 6. pp. 439-445.
@article{07ef90ca0c514cb389b761c7b3c87a66,
title = "Who's up first? Testing for order effects in structured interviews using a counterbalanced experimental design",
abstract = "A growing body of research suggests that, apart from the wording of specific questions, various aspects of the interview process itself may affect the reliability of information provided by research participants. To examine whether the order of presentation of specific diagnostic modules affects the likelihood of subjects' yes/no responses within the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC), the authors used a counterbalanced design, presenting two DISC diagnostic modules to children and their parents in standard or reversed order. Results indicate that the order of module administration exerts effects on the total numbers of symptoms endorsed, level of impairment, and the likelihood of meeting diagnostic criteria, regardless of whether the information is provided by parent or child respondents. Future child and adult assessment measures should take these difficulties fully into account through novel approaches to instrument design and interview procedures.",
keywords = "Assessment, Diagnosis, Diagnostic interviews, DISC, Reliability",
author = "Jensen, {Peter S.} and Watanabe, {Henry K.} and Richters, {John E.}",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "439--445",
journal = "Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology",
issn = "0091-0627",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who's up first? Testing for order effects in structured interviews using a counterbalanced experimental design

AU - Jensen, Peter S.

AU - Watanabe, Henry K.

AU - Richters, John E.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - A growing body of research suggests that, apart from the wording of specific questions, various aspects of the interview process itself may affect the reliability of information provided by research participants. To examine whether the order of presentation of specific diagnostic modules affects the likelihood of subjects' yes/no responses within the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC), the authors used a counterbalanced design, presenting two DISC diagnostic modules to children and their parents in standard or reversed order. Results indicate that the order of module administration exerts effects on the total numbers of symptoms endorsed, level of impairment, and the likelihood of meeting diagnostic criteria, regardless of whether the information is provided by parent or child respondents. Future child and adult assessment measures should take these difficulties fully into account through novel approaches to instrument design and interview procedures.

AB - A growing body of research suggests that, apart from the wording of specific questions, various aspects of the interview process itself may affect the reliability of information provided by research participants. To examine whether the order of presentation of specific diagnostic modules affects the likelihood of subjects' yes/no responses within the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC), the authors used a counterbalanced design, presenting two DISC diagnostic modules to children and their parents in standard or reversed order. Results indicate that the order of module administration exerts effects on the total numbers of symptoms endorsed, level of impairment, and the likelihood of meeting diagnostic criteria, regardless of whether the information is provided by parent or child respondents. Future child and adult assessment measures should take these difficulties fully into account through novel approaches to instrument design and interview procedures.

KW - Assessment

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Diagnostic interviews

KW - DISC

KW - Reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033429428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033429428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10821625

AN - SCOPUS:0033429428

VL - 27

SP - 439

EP - 445

JO - Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

JF - Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

SN - 0091-0627

IS - 6

ER -