Where are we with Web-based learning in medical education?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article summarizes several years of research in Web-based learning (WBL) to illustrate that, in general, research fails to address the questions that will inform our use of this powerful tool. In particular, media-comparative research - the comparison of WBL to another medium (e.g. lecture) - is hopelessly confounded and does little to inform practice. Rather than asking 'If' we should use WBL (we should!), researchers should ask 'How' and 'When' to use WBL. 'How' will be answered by evaluating specific elements of instructional design including theory-based instructional methods, adaptations to individual characteristics and details of presentation enhancements. 'When' will require study of issues such as just-in-time learning, effective use of simulation, and integration of WBL within and between institutions. Both quantitative and qualitative research methods will be useful. Educators should also look outside medical education for evidence and theories to guide their practice. Finally, while WBL has many advantages it is not inherently better than other media. The author suggests that learning outcomes be defined first and WBL be used only when it appears to be the most effective means of achieving these outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)594-598
Number of pages5
JournalMedical Teacher
Volume28
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Medical Education
Learning
learning
education
Research
Qualitative Research
comparative research
quantitative research
qualitative method
research method
qualitative research
Research Personnel
educator
simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nursing(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Where are we with Web-based learning in medical education? / Cook, David Allan.

In: Medical Teacher, Vol. 28, No. 7, 11.2006, p. 594-598.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2400641f299d4cc998953b2f515a047a,
title = "Where are we with Web-based learning in medical education?",
abstract = "This article summarizes several years of research in Web-based learning (WBL) to illustrate that, in general, research fails to address the questions that will inform our use of this powerful tool. In particular, media-comparative research - the comparison of WBL to another medium (e.g. lecture) - is hopelessly confounded and does little to inform practice. Rather than asking 'If' we should use WBL (we should!), researchers should ask 'How' and 'When' to use WBL. 'How' will be answered by evaluating specific elements of instructional design including theory-based instructional methods, adaptations to individual characteristics and details of presentation enhancements. 'When' will require study of issues such as just-in-time learning, effective use of simulation, and integration of WBL within and between institutions. Both quantitative and qualitative research methods will be useful. Educators should also look outside medical education for evidence and theories to guide their practice. Finally, while WBL has many advantages it is not inherently better than other media. The author suggests that learning outcomes be defined first and WBL be used only when it appears to be the most effective means of achieving these outcomes.",
author = "Cook, {David Allan}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/01421590601028854",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "594--598",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Where are we with Web-based learning in medical education?

AU - Cook, David Allan

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - This article summarizes several years of research in Web-based learning (WBL) to illustrate that, in general, research fails to address the questions that will inform our use of this powerful tool. In particular, media-comparative research - the comparison of WBL to another medium (e.g. lecture) - is hopelessly confounded and does little to inform practice. Rather than asking 'If' we should use WBL (we should!), researchers should ask 'How' and 'When' to use WBL. 'How' will be answered by evaluating specific elements of instructional design including theory-based instructional methods, adaptations to individual characteristics and details of presentation enhancements. 'When' will require study of issues such as just-in-time learning, effective use of simulation, and integration of WBL within and between institutions. Both quantitative and qualitative research methods will be useful. Educators should also look outside medical education for evidence and theories to guide their practice. Finally, while WBL has many advantages it is not inherently better than other media. The author suggests that learning outcomes be defined first and WBL be used only when it appears to be the most effective means of achieving these outcomes.

AB - This article summarizes several years of research in Web-based learning (WBL) to illustrate that, in general, research fails to address the questions that will inform our use of this powerful tool. In particular, media-comparative research - the comparison of WBL to another medium (e.g. lecture) - is hopelessly confounded and does little to inform practice. Rather than asking 'If' we should use WBL (we should!), researchers should ask 'How' and 'When' to use WBL. 'How' will be answered by evaluating specific elements of instructional design including theory-based instructional methods, adaptations to individual characteristics and details of presentation enhancements. 'When' will require study of issues such as just-in-time learning, effective use of simulation, and integration of WBL within and between institutions. Both quantitative and qualitative research methods will be useful. Educators should also look outside medical education for evidence and theories to guide their practice. Finally, while WBL has many advantages it is not inherently better than other media. The author suggests that learning outcomes be defined first and WBL be used only when it appears to be the most effective means of achieving these outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250855578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250855578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01421590601028854

DO - 10.1080/01421590601028854

M3 - Article

C2 - 17594549

AN - SCOPUS:34250855578

VL - 28

SP - 594

EP - 598

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 7

ER -