What is the value of a star when choosing a provider for total joint replacement? A discrete choice experiment

Adam J. Schwartz, Kathleen J. Yost, Kevin J. Bozic, David A. Etzioni, T. S. Raghu, Irfan Emrah Kanat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The past decade witnessed a rapid rise in the public reporting of surgeon-and hospital-specific quality-of-care measures. However, patients’ interpretations of star ratings and their importance relative to other considerations (for example, cost, distance traveled) are poorly understood. We conducted a discrete choice experiment in an outpatient setting (an academic joint arthroplasty practice) to study trade-offs that patients are willing to make in choosing a provider for a hypothetical total joint arthroplasty. Two hundred consecutive new patients presenting for hip or knee pain in 2018 were included. The average patient was willing to pay $2,607 and $3,152 extra for an additional hospital or physician star, respectively, and an extra $11.45 to not travel an extra mile for arthroplasty care. History of prior surgery and prior experience with rating systems reduced the relative value of an incremental star by $539.25 and $934.50, respectively. Patients appear willing to accept significantly higher copayments for higher quality of care, and surgeon quality seems relatively more important than hospital quality. Further study is needed to understand the value and trust patients place in publicly reported hospital and surgeon quality ratings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)138-145
Number of pages8
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What is the value of a star when choosing a provider for total joint replacement? A discrete choice experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this