What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates?

Leslie A. Curry, Erica Spatz, Emily Cherlin, Jennifer W. Thompson, David Berg, Henry H. Ting, Carole Decker, Harlan M. Krumholz, Elizabeth H. Bradley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

207 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Mortality rates for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) vary substantially across hospitals, even when adjusted for patient severity; however, little is known about hospital factors that may influence this variation. Objective: To identify factors that may be related to better performance in AMI care, as measured by risk-standardized mortality rates. Design: Qualitative study that used site visits and in-depth interviews. Setting: Eleven U.S. hospitals that ranked in either the top or the bottom 5% in risk-standardized mortality rates for 2 recent years of data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2005 to 2006 and 2006 to 2007), with diversity among hospitals in key characteristics. Participants: 158 members of hospital staff, all of whom were involved with AMI care at the 11 hospitals. Measurements: Site visits and in-depth interviews conducted with hospital staff during 2009. A multidisciplinary team performed analyses by using the constant comparative method. Results: Hospitals in the high-performing and low-performing groups differed substantially in the domains of organizational values and goals, senior management involvement, broad staff presence and expertise in AMI care, communication and coordination among groups, and problem solving and learning. Participants described diverse protocols or processes for AMI care (such as rapid response teams, clinical guidelines, use of hospitalists, and medication reconciliation); however, these did not systematically differentiate highperforming from low-performing hospitals. Limitation: The qualitative design informed the generation of hypotheses, and statistical associations could not be assessed. Conclusion: High-performing hospitals were characterized by an organizational culture that supported efforts to improve AMI care across the hospital. Evidence-based protocols and processes, although important, may not be sufficient for achieving high hospital performance in care for patients with AMI. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, United Health Foundation, and the Commonwealth Fund.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)384-390
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume154
Issue number6
StatePublished - Mar 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Myocardial Infarction
Mortality
Organizational Objectives
Medication Reconciliation
Hospitalists
Interviews
Organizational Culture
Health Services Research
Medicaid
Medicare
Patient Care
Communication
Learning
Guidelines
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Curry, L. A., Spatz, E., Cherlin, E., Thompson, J. W., Berg, D., Ting, H. H., ... Bradley, E. H. (2011). What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates? Annals of Internal Medicine, 154(6), 384-390.

What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates? / Curry, Leslie A.; Spatz, Erica; Cherlin, Emily; Thompson, Jennifer W.; Berg, David; Ting, Henry H.; Decker, Carole; Krumholz, Harlan M.; Bradley, Elizabeth H.

In: Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 154, No. 6, 03.2011, p. 384-390.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Curry, LA, Spatz, E, Cherlin, E, Thompson, JW, Berg, D, Ting, HH, Decker, C, Krumholz, HM & Bradley, EH 2011, 'What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates?', Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 154, no. 6, pp. 384-390.
Curry LA, Spatz E, Cherlin E, Thompson JW, Berg D, Ting HH et al. What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates? Annals of Internal Medicine. 2011 Mar;154(6):384-390.
Curry, Leslie A. ; Spatz, Erica ; Cherlin, Emily ; Thompson, Jennifer W. ; Berg, David ; Ting, Henry H. ; Decker, Carole ; Krumholz, Harlan M. ; Bradley, Elizabeth H. / What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates?. In: Annals of Internal Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 154, No. 6. pp. 384-390.
@article{2fa36a44be6944b282d9a2a25c5660f0,
title = "What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates?",
abstract = "Background: Mortality rates for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) vary substantially across hospitals, even when adjusted for patient severity; however, little is known about hospital factors that may influence this variation. Objective: To identify factors that may be related to better performance in AMI care, as measured by risk-standardized mortality rates. Design: Qualitative study that used site visits and in-depth interviews. Setting: Eleven U.S. hospitals that ranked in either the top or the bottom 5{\%} in risk-standardized mortality rates for 2 recent years of data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2005 to 2006 and 2006 to 2007), with diversity among hospitals in key characteristics. Participants: 158 members of hospital staff, all of whom were involved with AMI care at the 11 hospitals. Measurements: Site visits and in-depth interviews conducted with hospital staff during 2009. A multidisciplinary team performed analyses by using the constant comparative method. Results: Hospitals in the high-performing and low-performing groups differed substantially in the domains of organizational values and goals, senior management involvement, broad staff presence and expertise in AMI care, communication and coordination among groups, and problem solving and learning. Participants described diverse protocols or processes for AMI care (such as rapid response teams, clinical guidelines, use of hospitalists, and medication reconciliation); however, these did not systematically differentiate highperforming from low-performing hospitals. Limitation: The qualitative design informed the generation of hypotheses, and statistical associations could not be assessed. Conclusion: High-performing hospitals were characterized by an organizational culture that supported efforts to improve AMI care across the hospital. Evidence-based protocols and processes, although important, may not be sufficient for achieving high hospital performance in care for patients with AMI. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, United Health Foundation, and the Commonwealth Fund.",
author = "Curry, {Leslie A.} and Erica Spatz and Emily Cherlin and Thompson, {Jennifer W.} and David Berg and Ting, {Henry H.} and Carole Decker and Krumholz, {Harlan M.} and Bradley, {Elizabeth H.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "154",
pages = "384--390",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates?

AU - Curry, Leslie A.

AU - Spatz, Erica

AU - Cherlin, Emily

AU - Thompson, Jennifer W.

AU - Berg, David

AU - Ting, Henry H.

AU - Decker, Carole

AU - Krumholz, Harlan M.

AU - Bradley, Elizabeth H.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Background: Mortality rates for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) vary substantially across hospitals, even when adjusted for patient severity; however, little is known about hospital factors that may influence this variation. Objective: To identify factors that may be related to better performance in AMI care, as measured by risk-standardized mortality rates. Design: Qualitative study that used site visits and in-depth interviews. Setting: Eleven U.S. hospitals that ranked in either the top or the bottom 5% in risk-standardized mortality rates for 2 recent years of data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2005 to 2006 and 2006 to 2007), with diversity among hospitals in key characteristics. Participants: 158 members of hospital staff, all of whom were involved with AMI care at the 11 hospitals. Measurements: Site visits and in-depth interviews conducted with hospital staff during 2009. A multidisciplinary team performed analyses by using the constant comparative method. Results: Hospitals in the high-performing and low-performing groups differed substantially in the domains of organizational values and goals, senior management involvement, broad staff presence and expertise in AMI care, communication and coordination among groups, and problem solving and learning. Participants described diverse protocols or processes for AMI care (such as rapid response teams, clinical guidelines, use of hospitalists, and medication reconciliation); however, these did not systematically differentiate highperforming from low-performing hospitals. Limitation: The qualitative design informed the generation of hypotheses, and statistical associations could not be assessed. Conclusion: High-performing hospitals were characterized by an organizational culture that supported efforts to improve AMI care across the hospital. Evidence-based protocols and processes, although important, may not be sufficient for achieving high hospital performance in care for patients with AMI. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, United Health Foundation, and the Commonwealth Fund.

AB - Background: Mortality rates for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) vary substantially across hospitals, even when adjusted for patient severity; however, little is known about hospital factors that may influence this variation. Objective: To identify factors that may be related to better performance in AMI care, as measured by risk-standardized mortality rates. Design: Qualitative study that used site visits and in-depth interviews. Setting: Eleven U.S. hospitals that ranked in either the top or the bottom 5% in risk-standardized mortality rates for 2 recent years of data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2005 to 2006 and 2006 to 2007), with diversity among hospitals in key characteristics. Participants: 158 members of hospital staff, all of whom were involved with AMI care at the 11 hospitals. Measurements: Site visits and in-depth interviews conducted with hospital staff during 2009. A multidisciplinary team performed analyses by using the constant comparative method. Results: Hospitals in the high-performing and low-performing groups differed substantially in the domains of organizational values and goals, senior management involvement, broad staff presence and expertise in AMI care, communication and coordination among groups, and problem solving and learning. Participants described diverse protocols or processes for AMI care (such as rapid response teams, clinical guidelines, use of hospitalists, and medication reconciliation); however, these did not systematically differentiate highperforming from low-performing hospitals. Limitation: The qualitative design informed the generation of hypotheses, and statistical associations could not be assessed. Conclusion: High-performing hospitals were characterized by an organizational culture that supported efforts to improve AMI care across the hospital. Evidence-based protocols and processes, although important, may not be sufficient for achieving high hospital performance in care for patients with AMI. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, United Health Foundation, and the Commonwealth Fund.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952836681&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952836681&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21403074

AN - SCOPUS:79952836681

VL - 154

SP - 384

EP - 390

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 6

ER -