Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening. A randomized controlled trial

Rajeev Chaudhry, Sidna M. Scheitel, Erin K. McMurtry, Dorinda J. Leutink, Rosa L. Cabanela, James M Naessens, Ahmed S. Rahman, Lynn A. Davis, Robert J. Stroebel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Screening mammography is recommended for early detection of breast cancer but screening rates remain suboptimal. Methods: A primary care portal for a large academic primary practice was developed for all preventive services. Another Web-based system (PRECARES [PREventive CAre REminder System]) was developed for appointment secretaries to manage proactive breast cancer screening. Female patients aged 40 to 75 years were randomly assigned to a control group (usual care) and an intervention group. For the intervention group, 2 monthly letters inviting patients to undergo mammography were sent starting 3 months before they were due for annual screening, followed by a telephone call to nonresponding patients. A subgroup of women employees was further randomized to receive a reminder by either US mail or e-mail. Results: Of the total eligible population of 6665 women identified as having consented to participate in research, 3339 were randomly assigned to the control group and 3326 to the intervention group. The screening rate for annual mammography was 64.3% for the intervention group and 55.3% for the control group (P<.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for any of the other adult preventive services. For the employee subgroup, the screening rate was 57.5% for the control group, 68.1% for the US mail group, and 72.2% for the e-mail group (intervention vs control, P<.001; e-mail vs US mail; P=.24). Conclusion:The breast cancer screening rate improved significantly with the practice redesign of having appointment secretaries proactively manage breast cancer screening needs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)606-611
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Volume167
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 26 2007

Fingerprint

Postal Service
Early Detection of Cancer
Randomized Controlled Trials
Breast Neoplasms
Mammography
Control Groups
Appointments and Schedules
Reminder Systems
Preventive Medicine
Telephone
Primary Health Care
Research
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Chaudhry, R., Scheitel, S. M., McMurtry, E. K., Leutink, D. J., Cabanela, R. L., Naessens, J. M., ... Stroebel, R. J. (2007). Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening. A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Internal Medicine, 167(6), 606-611. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.6.606

Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening. A randomized controlled trial. / Chaudhry, Rajeev; Scheitel, Sidna M.; McMurtry, Erin K.; Leutink, Dorinda J.; Cabanela, Rosa L.; Naessens, James M; Rahman, Ahmed S.; Davis, Lynn A.; Stroebel, Robert J.

In: Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 167, No. 6, 26.03.2007, p. 606-611.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chaudhry, R, Scheitel, SM, McMurtry, EK, Leutink, DJ, Cabanela, RL, Naessens, JM, Rahman, AS, Davis, LA & Stroebel, RJ 2007, 'Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening. A randomized controlled trial', Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 167, no. 6, pp. 606-611. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.6.606
Chaudhry, Rajeev ; Scheitel, Sidna M. ; McMurtry, Erin K. ; Leutink, Dorinda J. ; Cabanela, Rosa L. ; Naessens, James M ; Rahman, Ahmed S. ; Davis, Lynn A. ; Stroebel, Robert J. / Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening. A randomized controlled trial. In: Archives of Internal Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 167, No. 6. pp. 606-611.
@article{152fd8974ea14b21be59da593e6a2b3d,
title = "Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening. A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Background: Screening mammography is recommended for early detection of breast cancer but screening rates remain suboptimal. Methods: A primary care portal for a large academic primary practice was developed for all preventive services. Another Web-based system (PRECARES [PREventive CAre REminder System]) was developed for appointment secretaries to manage proactive breast cancer screening. Female patients aged 40 to 75 years were randomly assigned to a control group (usual care) and an intervention group. For the intervention group, 2 monthly letters inviting patients to undergo mammography were sent starting 3 months before they were due for annual screening, followed by a telephone call to nonresponding patients. A subgroup of women employees was further randomized to receive a reminder by either US mail or e-mail. Results: Of the total eligible population of 6665 women identified as having consented to participate in research, 3339 were randomly assigned to the control group and 3326 to the intervention group. The screening rate for annual mammography was 64.3{\%} for the intervention group and 55.3{\%} for the control group (P<.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for any of the other adult preventive services. For the employee subgroup, the screening rate was 57.5{\%} for the control group, 68.1{\%} for the US mail group, and 72.2{\%} for the e-mail group (intervention vs control, P<.001; e-mail vs US mail; P=.24). Conclusion:The breast cancer screening rate improved significantly with the practice redesign of having appointment secretaries proactively manage breast cancer screening needs.",
author = "Rajeev Chaudhry and Scheitel, {Sidna M.} and McMurtry, {Erin K.} and Leutink, {Dorinda J.} and Cabanela, {Rosa L.} and Naessens, {James M} and Rahman, {Ahmed S.} and Davis, {Lynn A.} and Stroebel, {Robert J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1001/archinte.167.6.606",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "167",
pages = "606--611",
journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",
issn = "2168-6106",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening. A randomized controlled trial

AU - Chaudhry, Rajeev

AU - Scheitel, Sidna M.

AU - McMurtry, Erin K.

AU - Leutink, Dorinda J.

AU - Cabanela, Rosa L.

AU - Naessens, James M

AU - Rahman, Ahmed S.

AU - Davis, Lynn A.

AU - Stroebel, Robert J.

PY - 2007/3/26

Y1 - 2007/3/26

N2 - Background: Screening mammography is recommended for early detection of breast cancer but screening rates remain suboptimal. Methods: A primary care portal for a large academic primary practice was developed for all preventive services. Another Web-based system (PRECARES [PREventive CAre REminder System]) was developed for appointment secretaries to manage proactive breast cancer screening. Female patients aged 40 to 75 years were randomly assigned to a control group (usual care) and an intervention group. For the intervention group, 2 monthly letters inviting patients to undergo mammography were sent starting 3 months before they were due for annual screening, followed by a telephone call to nonresponding patients. A subgroup of women employees was further randomized to receive a reminder by either US mail or e-mail. Results: Of the total eligible population of 6665 women identified as having consented to participate in research, 3339 were randomly assigned to the control group and 3326 to the intervention group. The screening rate for annual mammography was 64.3% for the intervention group and 55.3% for the control group (P<.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for any of the other adult preventive services. For the employee subgroup, the screening rate was 57.5% for the control group, 68.1% for the US mail group, and 72.2% for the e-mail group (intervention vs control, P<.001; e-mail vs US mail; P=.24). Conclusion:The breast cancer screening rate improved significantly with the practice redesign of having appointment secretaries proactively manage breast cancer screening needs.

AB - Background: Screening mammography is recommended for early detection of breast cancer but screening rates remain suboptimal. Methods: A primary care portal for a large academic primary practice was developed for all preventive services. Another Web-based system (PRECARES [PREventive CAre REminder System]) was developed for appointment secretaries to manage proactive breast cancer screening. Female patients aged 40 to 75 years were randomly assigned to a control group (usual care) and an intervention group. For the intervention group, 2 monthly letters inviting patients to undergo mammography were sent starting 3 months before they were due for annual screening, followed by a telephone call to nonresponding patients. A subgroup of women employees was further randomized to receive a reminder by either US mail or e-mail. Results: Of the total eligible population of 6665 women identified as having consented to participate in research, 3339 were randomly assigned to the control group and 3326 to the intervention group. The screening rate for annual mammography was 64.3% for the intervention group and 55.3% for the control group (P<.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for any of the other adult preventive services. For the employee subgroup, the screening rate was 57.5% for the control group, 68.1% for the US mail group, and 72.2% for the e-mail group (intervention vs control, P<.001; e-mail vs US mail; P=.24). Conclusion:The breast cancer screening rate improved significantly with the practice redesign of having appointment secretaries proactively manage breast cancer screening needs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34047145959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34047145959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archinte.167.6.606

DO - 10.1001/archinte.167.6.606

M3 - Article

C2 - 17389293

AN - SCOPUS:34047145959

VL - 167

SP - 606

EP - 611

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 6

ER -