Web-based learning

Pros, cons and controversies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

174 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Advantages of web-based learning (WBL) in medical education include overcoming barriers of distance and time, economies of scale, and novel instructional methods, while disadvantages include social isolation, up-front costs, and technical problems. Web-based learning is purported to facilitate individualised instruction, but this is currently more vision than reality. More importantly, many WBL instructional designs fail to incorporate principles of effective learning, and WBL is often used for the wrong reasons (eg for the sake of technology). Rather than trying to decide whether WBL is superior to or equivalent to other instructional media (research addressing this question will always be confounded), we should accept it as a potentially powerful instructional tool, and focus on learning when and how to use it. Educators should recognise that high fidelity, multimedia, simulations, and even WBL itself will not always be necessary to effectively facilitate learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-42
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London
Volume7
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Learning
Social Isolation
Multimedia
Medical Education
Technology
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • Distance learning
  • e-learning
  • Instructional design
  • Instructional method
  • Internet
  • Medical education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Web-based learning : Pros, cons and controversies. / Cook, David Allan.

In: Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 37-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{19b61225c4d14af3a009fa4ddc1a2fcd,
title = "Web-based learning: Pros, cons and controversies",
abstract = "Advantages of web-based learning (WBL) in medical education include overcoming barriers of distance and time, economies of scale, and novel instructional methods, while disadvantages include social isolation, up-front costs, and technical problems. Web-based learning is purported to facilitate individualised instruction, but this is currently more vision than reality. More importantly, many WBL instructional designs fail to incorporate principles of effective learning, and WBL is often used for the wrong reasons (eg for the sake of technology). Rather than trying to decide whether WBL is superior to or equivalent to other instructional media (research addressing this question will always be confounded), we should accept it as a potentially powerful instructional tool, and focus on learning when and how to use it. Educators should recognise that high fidelity, multimedia, simulations, and even WBL itself will not always be necessary to effectively facilitate learning.",
keywords = "Distance learning, e-learning, Instructional design, Instructional method, Internet, Medical education",
author = "Cook, {David Allan}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "37--42",
journal = "Clinical Medicine",
issn = "1470-2118",
publisher = "Royal College of Physicians",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Web-based learning

T2 - Pros, cons and controversies

AU - Cook, David Allan

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - Advantages of web-based learning (WBL) in medical education include overcoming barriers of distance and time, economies of scale, and novel instructional methods, while disadvantages include social isolation, up-front costs, and technical problems. Web-based learning is purported to facilitate individualised instruction, but this is currently more vision than reality. More importantly, many WBL instructional designs fail to incorporate principles of effective learning, and WBL is often used for the wrong reasons (eg for the sake of technology). Rather than trying to decide whether WBL is superior to or equivalent to other instructional media (research addressing this question will always be confounded), we should accept it as a potentially powerful instructional tool, and focus on learning when and how to use it. Educators should recognise that high fidelity, multimedia, simulations, and even WBL itself will not always be necessary to effectively facilitate learning.

AB - Advantages of web-based learning (WBL) in medical education include overcoming barriers of distance and time, economies of scale, and novel instructional methods, while disadvantages include social isolation, up-front costs, and technical problems. Web-based learning is purported to facilitate individualised instruction, but this is currently more vision than reality. More importantly, many WBL instructional designs fail to incorporate principles of effective learning, and WBL is often used for the wrong reasons (eg for the sake of technology). Rather than trying to decide whether WBL is superior to or equivalent to other instructional media (research addressing this question will always be confounded), we should accept it as a potentially powerful instructional tool, and focus on learning when and how to use it. Educators should recognise that high fidelity, multimedia, simulations, and even WBL itself will not always be necessary to effectively facilitate learning.

KW - Distance learning

KW - e-learning

KW - Instructional design

KW - Instructional method

KW - Internet

KW - Medical education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847408964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847408964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 37

EP - 42

JO - Clinical Medicine

JF - Clinical Medicine

SN - 1470-2118

IS - 1

ER -