TY - JOUR
T1 - Varying nicotine patch dose and type of smoking cessation counseling
AU - Jorenby, Douglas E.
AU - Smith, Stevens S.
AU - Fiore, Michael C.
AU - Hurt, Richard D.
AU - Offord, Kenneth P.
AU - Croghan, Ivana T.
AU - Hays, J. Taylor
AU - Lewis, Stephen F.
AU - Baker, Timothy B.
PY - 1995/11/1
Y1 - 1995/11/1
N2 - Objective. - To compare the efficacy and safety of 22-mg and 44-mg doses of transdermal nicotine therapy when it is paired with minimal, individual, or group counseling to improve smoking cessation rates. Design. - An 8-week clinical trial (4 weeks double-blind followed by 4 weeks open label) using random assignment of participants to both dose (22 or 44 mg) and counseling (minimal, individual, or group) conditions. Participants. - Daily cigarette smokers (≥15 cigarettes per day for at least 1 year) who volunteered to participate in a study of smoking cessation treatment. A total of 504 participants were enrolled at two sites. Intervention. - Four weeks of 22- or 44-mg transdermal nicotine therapy followed by 4 weeks of dosage reduction (2 weeks of 22 mg followed by 2 weeks of 11 mg). Counseling consisted of a self- help pamphlet (minimal); a self-help pamphlet, a brief physician motivational message, and three brief (<15 minutes) follow-up visits with a nurse (individual); or the pamphlet, the motivational message, and eight weekly 1- hour group smoking cessation counseling visits (group). All participants returned weekly to turn in questionnaires and for assessment of their smoking status. Main Outcome Measures. - Abstinence from smoking was based on self- report, confirmed by an expired carbon monoxide concentration lower than 10 ppm. Withdrawal severity was assessed by means of an eight-item self-report questionnaire completed daily. Results. - Smoking cessation rates for the two nicotine patch doses and three levels of counseling did not differ significantly at either 8 weeks or 26 weeks following the quit date. Among those receiving minimal contact, the 44-mg dose produced greater abstinence at 4 weeks than did the 22-mg dose (68% vs 45%; P<.01). Participants receiving minimal-contact adjuvant treatment were less likely to be abstinent at the end of 4 weeks than those receiving individual or group counseling (56% vs 67%; P<.05). The 44-mg dose decreased desire to smoke more than the 22-mg dose, but this effect was not related to success in quitting smoking. Transdermal nicotine therapy at doses of 44 mg produced a significantly greater frequency of nausea (28%), vomiting (10%), and erythema with edema at the patch site (30%) than did a 22-mg dose (10%, 2%, and 13%, respectively; P<.01 for each adverse effect). Three serious adverse events occurred during use of the 44-mg patch dose. Conclusions. - There does not appear to be any general, sustained benefit of initiating transdermal nicotine therapy with a 44-mg patch dose or of providing intense adjuvant smoking cessation treatment. The two doses and all adjuvant treatments produced equivalent effects at the 26-week follow-up, and the higher patch dose produced more adverse effects. Higher-dose (44-mg) nicotine replacement does not appear to be indicated for general clinical populations, although it may provide short- term benefit to some smokers attempting to quit with minimal adjuvant treatment.
AB - Objective. - To compare the efficacy and safety of 22-mg and 44-mg doses of transdermal nicotine therapy when it is paired with minimal, individual, or group counseling to improve smoking cessation rates. Design. - An 8-week clinical trial (4 weeks double-blind followed by 4 weeks open label) using random assignment of participants to both dose (22 or 44 mg) and counseling (minimal, individual, or group) conditions. Participants. - Daily cigarette smokers (≥15 cigarettes per day for at least 1 year) who volunteered to participate in a study of smoking cessation treatment. A total of 504 participants were enrolled at two sites. Intervention. - Four weeks of 22- or 44-mg transdermal nicotine therapy followed by 4 weeks of dosage reduction (2 weeks of 22 mg followed by 2 weeks of 11 mg). Counseling consisted of a self- help pamphlet (minimal); a self-help pamphlet, a brief physician motivational message, and three brief (<15 minutes) follow-up visits with a nurse (individual); or the pamphlet, the motivational message, and eight weekly 1- hour group smoking cessation counseling visits (group). All participants returned weekly to turn in questionnaires and for assessment of their smoking status. Main Outcome Measures. - Abstinence from smoking was based on self- report, confirmed by an expired carbon monoxide concentration lower than 10 ppm. Withdrawal severity was assessed by means of an eight-item self-report questionnaire completed daily. Results. - Smoking cessation rates for the two nicotine patch doses and three levels of counseling did not differ significantly at either 8 weeks or 26 weeks following the quit date. Among those receiving minimal contact, the 44-mg dose produced greater abstinence at 4 weeks than did the 22-mg dose (68% vs 45%; P<.01). Participants receiving minimal-contact adjuvant treatment were less likely to be abstinent at the end of 4 weeks than those receiving individual or group counseling (56% vs 67%; P<.05). The 44-mg dose decreased desire to smoke more than the 22-mg dose, but this effect was not related to success in quitting smoking. Transdermal nicotine therapy at doses of 44 mg produced a significantly greater frequency of nausea (28%), vomiting (10%), and erythema with edema at the patch site (30%) than did a 22-mg dose (10%, 2%, and 13%, respectively; P<.01 for each adverse effect). Three serious adverse events occurred during use of the 44-mg patch dose. Conclusions. - There does not appear to be any general, sustained benefit of initiating transdermal nicotine therapy with a 44-mg patch dose or of providing intense adjuvant smoking cessation treatment. The two doses and all adjuvant treatments produced equivalent effects at the 26-week follow-up, and the higher patch dose produced more adverse effects. Higher-dose (44-mg) nicotine replacement does not appear to be indicated for general clinical populations, although it may provide short- term benefit to some smokers attempting to quit with minimal adjuvant treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028853583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028853583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jama.274.17.1347
DO - 10.1001/jama.274.17.1347
M3 - Article
C2 - 7563558
AN - SCOPUS:0028853583
SN - 0002-9955
VL - 274
SP - 1347
EP - 1352
JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
IS - 17
ER -