Value and process of curbside consultations in clinical practice

A grounded theory study

David Allan Cook, Kristi J. Sorensen, John M. Wilkinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To clarify the value and process of the curbside consultation and identify ways to optimize this activity. Participants and Methods: We conducted 13 focus groups at an academic medical center and outlying community sites (September 2011 to January 2013), involving a purposive sample of 54 primary care and subspecialist internal medicine and family medicine physicians. Focus group discussions were transcribed and then analyzed using a constant comparative approach to identify benefits, liabilities, mechanisms, and potential improvements related to curbside consultations. Results: We developed a model describing the role and process of the curbside consultation. Focus group participants perceived that curbside consultations add particular value in offering immediate, individualized answers with bidirectional information exchange, and this in turn expedites patient care and elevates patient confidence. Despite the uncompensated interruption and potential risks, experts provide curbside consultations because they appreciate the honor of being asked and the opportunity to help colleagues, expedite patient care, and teach. Key decisions for the initiator (each reflecting a potential barrier) include whom to contact, how to contact that expert, and how to determine availability. Experts decide to accept a request on the basis of personal expertise, physical location, and capacity to commit time and attention. Participants suggested systems-level improvements to facilitate expert selection, clarify expert availability, enhance access to clinical information, and acknowledge the expert's effort. Conclusions: Curbside consultations play an important role in enhancing communication and care coordination in clinical medicine, but the process can be further improved. Information technology solutions may play a key role.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)602-614
Number of pages13
JournalMayo Clinic Proceedings
Volume89
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Referral and Consultation
Focus Groups
Patient Care
Access to Information
Clinical Medicine
Family Physicians
Internal Medicine
Grounded Theory
Primary Health Care
Communication
Medicine
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Value and process of curbside consultations in clinical practice : A grounded theory study. / Cook, David Allan; Sorensen, Kristi J.; Wilkinson, John M.

In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 89, No. 5, 2014, p. 602-614.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cook, David Allan ; Sorensen, Kristi J. ; Wilkinson, John M. / Value and process of curbside consultations in clinical practice : A grounded theory study. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2014 ; Vol. 89, No. 5. pp. 602-614.
@article{7ca7457417d94db58e94775202be99f2,
title = "Value and process of curbside consultations in clinical practice: A grounded theory study",
abstract = "Objectives: To clarify the value and process of the curbside consultation and identify ways to optimize this activity. Participants and Methods: We conducted 13 focus groups at an academic medical center and outlying community sites (September 2011 to January 2013), involving a purposive sample of 54 primary care and subspecialist internal medicine and family medicine physicians. Focus group discussions were transcribed and then analyzed using a constant comparative approach to identify benefits, liabilities, mechanisms, and potential improvements related to curbside consultations. Results: We developed a model describing the role and process of the curbside consultation. Focus group participants perceived that curbside consultations add particular value in offering immediate, individualized answers with bidirectional information exchange, and this in turn expedites patient care and elevates patient confidence. Despite the uncompensated interruption and potential risks, experts provide curbside consultations because they appreciate the honor of being asked and the opportunity to help colleagues, expedite patient care, and teach. Key decisions for the initiator (each reflecting a potential barrier) include whom to contact, how to contact that expert, and how to determine availability. Experts decide to accept a request on the basis of personal expertise, physical location, and capacity to commit time and attention. Participants suggested systems-level improvements to facilitate expert selection, clarify expert availability, enhance access to clinical information, and acknowledge the expert's effort. Conclusions: Curbside consultations play an important role in enhancing communication and care coordination in clinical medicine, but the process can be further improved. Information technology solutions may play a key role.",
author = "Cook, {David Allan} and Sorensen, {Kristi J.} and Wilkinson, {John M.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "602--614",
journal = "Mayo Clinic Proceedings",
issn = "0025-6196",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Value and process of curbside consultations in clinical practice

T2 - A grounded theory study

AU - Cook, David Allan

AU - Sorensen, Kristi J.

AU - Wilkinson, John M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objectives: To clarify the value and process of the curbside consultation and identify ways to optimize this activity. Participants and Methods: We conducted 13 focus groups at an academic medical center and outlying community sites (September 2011 to January 2013), involving a purposive sample of 54 primary care and subspecialist internal medicine and family medicine physicians. Focus group discussions were transcribed and then analyzed using a constant comparative approach to identify benefits, liabilities, mechanisms, and potential improvements related to curbside consultations. Results: We developed a model describing the role and process of the curbside consultation. Focus group participants perceived that curbside consultations add particular value in offering immediate, individualized answers with bidirectional information exchange, and this in turn expedites patient care and elevates patient confidence. Despite the uncompensated interruption and potential risks, experts provide curbside consultations because they appreciate the honor of being asked and the opportunity to help colleagues, expedite patient care, and teach. Key decisions for the initiator (each reflecting a potential barrier) include whom to contact, how to contact that expert, and how to determine availability. Experts decide to accept a request on the basis of personal expertise, physical location, and capacity to commit time and attention. Participants suggested systems-level improvements to facilitate expert selection, clarify expert availability, enhance access to clinical information, and acknowledge the expert's effort. Conclusions: Curbside consultations play an important role in enhancing communication and care coordination in clinical medicine, but the process can be further improved. Information technology solutions may play a key role.

AB - Objectives: To clarify the value and process of the curbside consultation and identify ways to optimize this activity. Participants and Methods: We conducted 13 focus groups at an academic medical center and outlying community sites (September 2011 to January 2013), involving a purposive sample of 54 primary care and subspecialist internal medicine and family medicine physicians. Focus group discussions were transcribed and then analyzed using a constant comparative approach to identify benefits, liabilities, mechanisms, and potential improvements related to curbside consultations. Results: We developed a model describing the role and process of the curbside consultation. Focus group participants perceived that curbside consultations add particular value in offering immediate, individualized answers with bidirectional information exchange, and this in turn expedites patient care and elevates patient confidence. Despite the uncompensated interruption and potential risks, experts provide curbside consultations because they appreciate the honor of being asked and the opportunity to help colleagues, expedite patient care, and teach. Key decisions for the initiator (each reflecting a potential barrier) include whom to contact, how to contact that expert, and how to determine availability. Experts decide to accept a request on the basis of personal expertise, physical location, and capacity to commit time and attention. Participants suggested systems-level improvements to facilitate expert selection, clarify expert availability, enhance access to clinical information, and acknowledge the expert's effort. Conclusions: Curbside consultations play an important role in enhancing communication and care coordination in clinical medicine, but the process can be further improved. Information technology solutions may play a key role.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901491332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901491332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.015

DO - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.015

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 602

EP - 614

JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

SN - 0025-6196

IS - 5

ER -