Utility of percutaneous joint aspiration and synovial biopsy in identifying culture-positive infected hip arthroplasty

M. Connor Cross, Mark J. Kransdorf, F. Spencer Chivers, Roxanne Lorans, Catherine C. Roberts, Adam J. Schwartz, Christopher P. Beauchamp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Percutaneous synovial biopsy has recently been reported to have a high diagnostic value in the preoperative identification of periprosthetic infection of the hip. We report our experience with this technique in the evaluation of patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty, comparing results of preoperative synovial biopsy with joint aspiration in identifying an infected hip arthroplasty by bacteriological analysis. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the results of the 110 most recent revision hip arthroplasties in which preoperative synovial biopsy and joint aspiration were both performed. Revision surgery for these patients occurred during the period from September 2005 to March 2012. Using this study group, results from preoperative cultures were compared with preoperative laboratory studies and the results of intraoperative cultures. Synovial aspiration was done using an 18- or 20-gauge spinal needle. Synovial biopsy was done coaxially following aspiration using a 22-gauge Chiba needle or 21-gauge Sure-Cut needle. Standard microbiological analysis was performed on preoperative synovial fluid aspirate and synovial biopsy. Intraoperative tissue biopsy bacteriological analysis results at surgical revision were accepted as the "gold standard" for the presence or absence of infection. Results: Seventeen of 110 (15 %) of patients had intraoperative culture-positive periprosthetic infection. Of these 17 cases, there were ten cases where either the synovial fluid aspiration and/or the synovial biopsy were true positive (sensitivity of 59 %, specificity of 100 %, positive predictive value of 100 % and accuracy of 94 %). There were seven cases where aspiration and biopsy results were both falsely negative, but no false-positive results. Similar results were found for synovial fluid aspiration alone. The results of synovial biopsy alone resulted in the identification of seven infected joints with no false-positive result (sensitivity of 41 %, specificity of 100 %, positive predictive value of 100 %, and accuracy of 91 %). Conclusions: Standard microbiological analyses performed on percutaneous synovial biopsy specimen during the preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty did not improve detection of culture-positive periprosthetic infection as compared to synovial fluid aspiration alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-168
Number of pages4
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2014

Keywords

  • Arthroplasty
  • Hip
  • Infection
  • Percutaneous joint aspiration
  • Periprosthetic infection
  • Prosthesis
  • Synovial biopsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Utility of percutaneous joint aspiration and synovial biopsy in identifying culture-positive infected hip arthroplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Cross, M. C., Kransdorf, M. J., Chivers, F. S., Lorans, R., Roberts, C. C., Schwartz, A. J., & Beauchamp, C. P. (2014). Utility of percutaneous joint aspiration and synovial biopsy in identifying culture-positive infected hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiology, 43(2), 165-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1757-6