Use of a new myocardial centroid for measurement of regional myocardial dysfunction by electron beam computed tomography: Comparison with technetium-99m sestamibi infarct size quantification

Thomas C. Gerber, Axel Schmermund, Judd E. Reed, John A. Rumberger, Patrick F. Sheedy, Raymond J Gibbons, David Holmes, Thomas Behrenbeck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The study compared the performance of conventional endocardial and epicardial centroid algorithms with the new "myocardial" centroid algorithm in patients with anterior myocardial infarction. "Floating" endocardial or epicardial centroid algorithms, commonly used in tomographic imaging methods to assess regional motion, may misrepresent left ventricular regional myocardial function in the presence of markedly asymmetric left ventricular contraction. METHODS. A new centroid algorithm based on regional myocardial mass distribution was tested in 29 patients with a first anterior myocardial infarction and was compared with conventional centroid algorithms. Direct comparisons in 60 equal sectors at one midventricular level per patient were performed between electron beam computed tomography and technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. The thresholds of regional myocardial function used to define infarction were varied for regional ejection fraction from 20% to 40% and for regional wall thickening from 0 to 4 mm. Regression and Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare infarct size by regional myocardial function with infarct size by sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. RESULTS. The new myocardial centroid showed the least shift toward infarcted myocardium from diastole to systole and had the highest amplitudes of the measurement curves for regional ejection fraction and regional wall thickening. The optimal regional myocardial function thresholds for each centroid algorithm for regional ejection fraction were endocardial, 30% (R = 0.62; mean difference to sestamibi, -0.5% ± 22.1% tomographic infarct size points); epicardial, 30% (R = 0.79; mean difference, 2.2% ± 13.1% tomographic infarct size points); and new myocardial, 25% (R = 0.88; mean difference, -0.6% ± 9.5% tomographic infarct size points). The optimal thresholds for regional wall thickening were endocardial, 1 mm (R = 0.70; mean difference, -2.2% ± 14.3% tomographic infarct size points); epicardial, 1 mm (R = 0.78; mean difference, -4.6% ± 12.7% tomographic infarct size points); and new myocardial, 2 mm (R = 0.71; mean difference, 2.1% ± 14.1% tomographic infarct size points). The best agreement (R = 0.88) between electron beam computed tomography infarct size and sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography infarct size was achieved with regional ejection fraction and the new myocardial centroid algorithm. CONCLUSIONS. In asymmetrically contracting left ventricles, the new myocardial centroid algorithm is superior to conventional methods for tomographic analysis of regional myocardial function.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-203
Number of pages11
JournalInvestigative Radiology
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi
X Ray Computed Tomography
Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography
Myocardial Infarction
Diastole
Systole
Infarction
Heart Ventricles
Myocardium

Keywords

  • Imaging
  • Myocardial contraction
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Nuclear medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Use of a new myocardial centroid for measurement of regional myocardial dysfunction by electron beam computed tomography : Comparison with technetium-99m sestamibi infarct size quantification. / Gerber, Thomas C.; Schmermund, Axel; Reed, Judd E.; Rumberger, John A.; Sheedy, Patrick F.; Gibbons, Raymond J; Holmes, David; Behrenbeck, Thomas.

In: Investigative Radiology, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2001, p. 193-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4ca89e39725441f38d3f87c0b45e6a0f,
title = "Use of a new myocardial centroid for measurement of regional myocardial dysfunction by electron beam computed tomography: Comparison with technetium-99m sestamibi infarct size quantification",
abstract = "RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The study compared the performance of conventional endocardial and epicardial centroid algorithms with the new {"}myocardial{"} centroid algorithm in patients with anterior myocardial infarction. {"}Floating{"} endocardial or epicardial centroid algorithms, commonly used in tomographic imaging methods to assess regional motion, may misrepresent left ventricular regional myocardial function in the presence of markedly asymmetric left ventricular contraction. METHODS. A new centroid algorithm based on regional myocardial mass distribution was tested in 29 patients with a first anterior myocardial infarction and was compared with conventional centroid algorithms. Direct comparisons in 60 equal sectors at one midventricular level per patient were performed between electron beam computed tomography and technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. The thresholds of regional myocardial function used to define infarction were varied for regional ejection fraction from 20{\%} to 40{\%} and for regional wall thickening from 0 to 4 mm. Regression and Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare infarct size by regional myocardial function with infarct size by sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. RESULTS. The new myocardial centroid showed the least shift toward infarcted myocardium from diastole to systole and had the highest amplitudes of the measurement curves for regional ejection fraction and regional wall thickening. The optimal regional myocardial function thresholds for each centroid algorithm for regional ejection fraction were endocardial, 30{\%} (R = 0.62; mean difference to sestamibi, -0.5{\%} ± 22.1{\%} tomographic infarct size points); epicardial, 30{\%} (R = 0.79; mean difference, 2.2{\%} ± 13.1{\%} tomographic infarct size points); and new myocardial, 25{\%} (R = 0.88; mean difference, -0.6{\%} ± 9.5{\%} tomographic infarct size points). The optimal thresholds for regional wall thickening were endocardial, 1 mm (R = 0.70; mean difference, -2.2{\%} ± 14.3{\%} tomographic infarct size points); epicardial, 1 mm (R = 0.78; mean difference, -4.6{\%} ± 12.7{\%} tomographic infarct size points); and new myocardial, 2 mm (R = 0.71; mean difference, 2.1{\%} ± 14.1{\%} tomographic infarct size points). The best agreement (R = 0.88) between electron beam computed tomography infarct size and sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography infarct size was achieved with regional ejection fraction and the new myocardial centroid algorithm. CONCLUSIONS. In asymmetrically contracting left ventricles, the new myocardial centroid algorithm is superior to conventional methods for tomographic analysis of regional myocardial function.",
keywords = "Imaging, Myocardial contraction, Myocardial infarction, Nuclear medicine",
author = "Gerber, {Thomas C.} and Axel Schmermund and Reed, {Judd E.} and Rumberger, {John A.} and Sheedy, {Patrick F.} and Gibbons, {Raymond J} and David Holmes and Thomas Behrenbeck",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1097/00004424-200104000-00001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "193--203",
journal = "Investigative Radiology",
issn = "0020-9996",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of a new myocardial centroid for measurement of regional myocardial dysfunction by electron beam computed tomography

T2 - Comparison with technetium-99m sestamibi infarct size quantification

AU - Gerber, Thomas C.

AU - Schmermund, Axel

AU - Reed, Judd E.

AU - Rumberger, John A.

AU - Sheedy, Patrick F.

AU - Gibbons, Raymond J

AU - Holmes, David

AU - Behrenbeck, Thomas

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The study compared the performance of conventional endocardial and epicardial centroid algorithms with the new "myocardial" centroid algorithm in patients with anterior myocardial infarction. "Floating" endocardial or epicardial centroid algorithms, commonly used in tomographic imaging methods to assess regional motion, may misrepresent left ventricular regional myocardial function in the presence of markedly asymmetric left ventricular contraction. METHODS. A new centroid algorithm based on regional myocardial mass distribution was tested in 29 patients with a first anterior myocardial infarction and was compared with conventional centroid algorithms. Direct comparisons in 60 equal sectors at one midventricular level per patient were performed between electron beam computed tomography and technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. The thresholds of regional myocardial function used to define infarction were varied for regional ejection fraction from 20% to 40% and for regional wall thickening from 0 to 4 mm. Regression and Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare infarct size by regional myocardial function with infarct size by sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. RESULTS. The new myocardial centroid showed the least shift toward infarcted myocardium from diastole to systole and had the highest amplitudes of the measurement curves for regional ejection fraction and regional wall thickening. The optimal regional myocardial function thresholds for each centroid algorithm for regional ejection fraction were endocardial, 30% (R = 0.62; mean difference to sestamibi, -0.5% ± 22.1% tomographic infarct size points); epicardial, 30% (R = 0.79; mean difference, 2.2% ± 13.1% tomographic infarct size points); and new myocardial, 25% (R = 0.88; mean difference, -0.6% ± 9.5% tomographic infarct size points). The optimal thresholds for regional wall thickening were endocardial, 1 mm (R = 0.70; mean difference, -2.2% ± 14.3% tomographic infarct size points); epicardial, 1 mm (R = 0.78; mean difference, -4.6% ± 12.7% tomographic infarct size points); and new myocardial, 2 mm (R = 0.71; mean difference, 2.1% ± 14.1% tomographic infarct size points). The best agreement (R = 0.88) between electron beam computed tomography infarct size and sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography infarct size was achieved with regional ejection fraction and the new myocardial centroid algorithm. CONCLUSIONS. In asymmetrically contracting left ventricles, the new myocardial centroid algorithm is superior to conventional methods for tomographic analysis of regional myocardial function.

AB - RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The study compared the performance of conventional endocardial and epicardial centroid algorithms with the new "myocardial" centroid algorithm in patients with anterior myocardial infarction. "Floating" endocardial or epicardial centroid algorithms, commonly used in tomographic imaging methods to assess regional motion, may misrepresent left ventricular regional myocardial function in the presence of markedly asymmetric left ventricular contraction. METHODS. A new centroid algorithm based on regional myocardial mass distribution was tested in 29 patients with a first anterior myocardial infarction and was compared with conventional centroid algorithms. Direct comparisons in 60 equal sectors at one midventricular level per patient were performed between electron beam computed tomography and technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. The thresholds of regional myocardial function used to define infarction were varied for regional ejection fraction from 20% to 40% and for regional wall thickening from 0 to 4 mm. Regression and Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare infarct size by regional myocardial function with infarct size by sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. RESULTS. The new myocardial centroid showed the least shift toward infarcted myocardium from diastole to systole and had the highest amplitudes of the measurement curves for regional ejection fraction and regional wall thickening. The optimal regional myocardial function thresholds for each centroid algorithm for regional ejection fraction were endocardial, 30% (R = 0.62; mean difference to sestamibi, -0.5% ± 22.1% tomographic infarct size points); epicardial, 30% (R = 0.79; mean difference, 2.2% ± 13.1% tomographic infarct size points); and new myocardial, 25% (R = 0.88; mean difference, -0.6% ± 9.5% tomographic infarct size points). The optimal thresholds for regional wall thickening were endocardial, 1 mm (R = 0.70; mean difference, -2.2% ± 14.3% tomographic infarct size points); epicardial, 1 mm (R = 0.78; mean difference, -4.6% ± 12.7% tomographic infarct size points); and new myocardial, 2 mm (R = 0.71; mean difference, 2.1% ± 14.1% tomographic infarct size points). The best agreement (R = 0.88) between electron beam computed tomography infarct size and sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography infarct size was achieved with regional ejection fraction and the new myocardial centroid algorithm. CONCLUSIONS. In asymmetrically contracting left ventricles, the new myocardial centroid algorithm is superior to conventional methods for tomographic analysis of regional myocardial function.

KW - Imaging

KW - Myocardial contraction

KW - Myocardial infarction

KW - Nuclear medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035075466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035075466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00004424-200104000-00001

DO - 10.1097/00004424-200104000-00001

M3 - Article

C2 - 11283416

AN - SCOPUS:0035075466

VL - 36

SP - 193

EP - 203

JO - Investigative Radiology

JF - Investigative Radiology

SN - 0020-9996

IS - 4

ER -