TY - JOUR
T1 - Upper abdominal normal organ contouring guidelines and atlas
T2 - A Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus
AU - Jabbour, Salma K.
AU - Hashem, Sameh A.
AU - Bosch, Walter
AU - Kim, Tae Kyoung
AU - Finkelstein, Steven E.
AU - Anderson, Bethany M.
AU - Ben-Josef, Edgar
AU - Crane, Christopher H.
AU - Goodman, Karyn A.
AU - Haddock, Michael G.
AU - Herman, Joseph M.
AU - Hong, Theodore S.
AU - Kachnic, Lisa A.
AU - Mamon, Harvey J.
AU - Pantarotto, Jason R.
AU - Dawson, Laura A.
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - Purpose: To standardize upper abdominal normal organ contouring guidelines for Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials. Methods and Materials: Twelve expert radiation oncologists contoured the liver, esophagus, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), stomach, duodenum, and common bile duct (CBD), and reviewed and edited 33 additional normal organ and blood vessel contours on an anonymized patient computed tomography (CT) dataset. Contours were overlaid and compared for agreement using MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA). S95 contours, defined as the binomial distribution to generate 95% group consensus contours, and normal organ contouring definitions were generated and reviewed by the panel. Results: There was excellent consistency and agreement of the liver, duodenal, and stomach contours, with substantial consistency for the esophagus contour, and moderate consistency for the GEJ and CBD contours using a Kappa statistic. Consensus definitions, detailed normal organ contouring recommendations and high-resolution images were developed. Conclusions: Consensus contouring guidelines and a CT image atlas should improve contouring uniformity in radiation oncology clinical planning and RTOG trials.
AB - Purpose: To standardize upper abdominal normal organ contouring guidelines for Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials. Methods and Materials: Twelve expert radiation oncologists contoured the liver, esophagus, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), stomach, duodenum, and common bile duct (CBD), and reviewed and edited 33 additional normal organ and blood vessel contours on an anonymized patient computed tomography (CT) dataset. Contours were overlaid and compared for agreement using MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA). S95 contours, defined as the binomial distribution to generate 95% group consensus contours, and normal organ contouring definitions were generated and reviewed by the panel. Results: There was excellent consistency and agreement of the liver, duodenal, and stomach contours, with substantial consistency for the esophagus contour, and moderate consistency for the GEJ and CBD contours using a Kappa statistic. Consensus definitions, detailed normal organ contouring recommendations and high-resolution images were developed. Conclusions: Consensus contouring guidelines and a CT image atlas should improve contouring uniformity in radiation oncology clinical planning and RTOG trials.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896721462&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896721462&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prro.2013.06.004
DO - 10.1016/j.prro.2013.06.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 24890348
AN - SCOPUS:84896721462
SN - 1879-8500
VL - 4
SP - 82
EP - 89
JO - Practical Radiation Oncology
JF - Practical Radiation Oncology
IS - 2
ER -