Unmet diagnostic needs in eosinophilic esophagitis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The description of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) from a clinical, endoscopic, histologic and mechanistic perspective has emerged at a rapid pace. Nevertheless, there are many key areas of diagnosis which remain problematic. The first area is trying to identify a gold standard for EoE, particularly in its differentiation from gastroesophageal reflux disease. As a result, many of the consensus guidelines advise expensive and cumbersome steps with endoscopy and empiric courses of medication that would not be needed should a completely accurate method for identifying EoE be developed. We also grapple with the lack of an accurate test short of endoscopy and biopsy to diagnose and monitor treatment response in EoE. This is particularly problematic in food elimination diets where patients may require up to ten endoscopies to determine precise food avoidance. Finally, it is imperative that we diagnose factors that predict severity and phenotype of the disease. This will yield far clearer guidance concerning the level and duration of therapy needed on EoE patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-142
Number of pages4
JournalDigestive Diseases
Volume32
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Endoscopy
Food
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Guidelines
Diet
Phenotype
Biopsy
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Diagnosis
  • Eosinophilic esophagitis
  • Phenotype

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Unmet diagnostic needs in eosinophilic esophagitis. / Katzka, David A.

In: Digestive Diseases, Vol. 32, No. 1-2, 2014, p. 139-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3b253ef9efbe4d36904dddb1bbf15ce5,
title = "Unmet diagnostic needs in eosinophilic esophagitis",
abstract = "The description of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) from a clinical, endoscopic, histologic and mechanistic perspective has emerged at a rapid pace. Nevertheless, there are many key areas of diagnosis which remain problematic. The first area is trying to identify a gold standard for EoE, particularly in its differentiation from gastroesophageal reflux disease. As a result, many of the consensus guidelines advise expensive and cumbersome steps with endoscopy and empiric courses of medication that would not be needed should a completely accurate method for identifying EoE be developed. We also grapple with the lack of an accurate test short of endoscopy and biopsy to diagnose and monitor treatment response in EoE. This is particularly problematic in food elimination diets where patients may require up to ten endoscopies to determine precise food avoidance. Finally, it is imperative that we diagnose factors that predict severity and phenotype of the disease. This will yield far clearer guidance concerning the level and duration of therapy needed on EoE patients.",
keywords = "Diagnosis, Eosinophilic esophagitis, Phenotype",
author = "Katzka, {David A}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1159/000357092",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "139--142",
journal = "Digestive Diseases",
issn = "0257-2753",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unmet diagnostic needs in eosinophilic esophagitis

AU - Katzka, David A

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The description of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) from a clinical, endoscopic, histologic and mechanistic perspective has emerged at a rapid pace. Nevertheless, there are many key areas of diagnosis which remain problematic. The first area is trying to identify a gold standard for EoE, particularly in its differentiation from gastroesophageal reflux disease. As a result, many of the consensus guidelines advise expensive and cumbersome steps with endoscopy and empiric courses of medication that would not be needed should a completely accurate method for identifying EoE be developed. We also grapple with the lack of an accurate test short of endoscopy and biopsy to diagnose and monitor treatment response in EoE. This is particularly problematic in food elimination diets where patients may require up to ten endoscopies to determine precise food avoidance. Finally, it is imperative that we diagnose factors that predict severity and phenotype of the disease. This will yield far clearer guidance concerning the level and duration of therapy needed on EoE patients.

AB - The description of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) from a clinical, endoscopic, histologic and mechanistic perspective has emerged at a rapid pace. Nevertheless, there are many key areas of diagnosis which remain problematic. The first area is trying to identify a gold standard for EoE, particularly in its differentiation from gastroesophageal reflux disease. As a result, many of the consensus guidelines advise expensive and cumbersome steps with endoscopy and empiric courses of medication that would not be needed should a completely accurate method for identifying EoE be developed. We also grapple with the lack of an accurate test short of endoscopy and biopsy to diagnose and monitor treatment response in EoE. This is particularly problematic in food elimination diets where patients may require up to ten endoscopies to determine precise food avoidance. Finally, it is imperative that we diagnose factors that predict severity and phenotype of the disease. This will yield far clearer guidance concerning the level and duration of therapy needed on EoE patients.

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Eosinophilic esophagitis

KW - Phenotype

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896121623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896121623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000357092

DO - 10.1159/000357092

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 139

EP - 142

JO - Digestive Diseases

JF - Digestive Diseases

SN - 0257-2753

IS - 1-2

ER -