Two-dimensional echocardiographic calculation of left ventricular mass as recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography

correlation with autopsy and M-mode echocardiography.

S. H. Park, C. Shub, T. P. Nobrega, Kent R Bailey, J. B. Seward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

123 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) has recommended diastolic area length and truncated ellipsoid methods for estimating left ventricular (LV) mass by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. The major goals of this retrospective study were to (1) assess the correlation between ASE-recommended 2D and M-mode echo-derived measurements of LV mass, (2) compare the two ASE-recommended 2D echocardiography methods, and (3) compare the echo-derived LV mass with anatomic LV mass. The study included 2D echocardiograms obtained within 30 days of death from 34 patients who subsequently underwent autopsy and 2D echocardiograms of 56 normal subjects. The formula used for measurement of M-mode echo-derived LV mass was LV mass = 0.8 (ASE-cube LV mass) + 0.6 gm. For 2D echo-derived LV mass, the ASE-recommended area length and truncated ellipsoid methods in systole and diastole were used, with and without incorporating the papillary muscles into the myocardial shell. LV mass derived by M-mode echocardiography was comparable to that derived by 2D methods, and it is reasonable to use this technique for normally shaped ventricles. When the papillary muscles were included into the myocardial shell, diastolic 2D methods overestimated autopsy LV mass. Both diastolic area length and truncated ellipsoid methods were comparable to autopsy LV mass. When the papillary muscles were excluded, the systolic area length method showed the best agreement with autopsy LV mass.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-128
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume9
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 1996

Fingerprint

Echocardiography
Autopsy
Papillary Muscles
Diastole
Systole
Retrospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{2049a5df50c04a39bc20b1ac88991aa0,
title = "Two-dimensional echocardiographic calculation of left ventricular mass as recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography: correlation with autopsy and M-mode echocardiography.",
abstract = "The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) has recommended diastolic area length and truncated ellipsoid methods for estimating left ventricular (LV) mass by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. The major goals of this retrospective study were to (1) assess the correlation between ASE-recommended 2D and M-mode echo-derived measurements of LV mass, (2) compare the two ASE-recommended 2D echocardiography methods, and (3) compare the echo-derived LV mass with anatomic LV mass. The study included 2D echocardiograms obtained within 30 days of death from 34 patients who subsequently underwent autopsy and 2D echocardiograms of 56 normal subjects. The formula used for measurement of M-mode echo-derived LV mass was LV mass = 0.8 (ASE-cube LV mass) + 0.6 gm. For 2D echo-derived LV mass, the ASE-recommended area length and truncated ellipsoid methods in systole and diastole were used, with and without incorporating the papillary muscles into the myocardial shell. LV mass derived by M-mode echocardiography was comparable to that derived by 2D methods, and it is reasonable to use this technique for normally shaped ventricles. When the papillary muscles were included into the myocardial shell, diastolic 2D methods overestimated autopsy LV mass. Both diastolic area length and truncated ellipsoid methods were comparable to autopsy LV mass. When the papillary muscles were excluded, the systolic area length method showed the best agreement with autopsy LV mass.",
author = "Park, {S. H.} and C. Shub and Nobrega, {T. P.} and Bailey, {Kent R} and Seward, {J. B.}",
year = "1996",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "119--128",
journal = "Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography",
issn = "0894-7317",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two-dimensional echocardiographic calculation of left ventricular mass as recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography

T2 - correlation with autopsy and M-mode echocardiography.

AU - Park, S. H.

AU - Shub, C.

AU - Nobrega, T. P.

AU - Bailey, Kent R

AU - Seward, J. B.

PY - 1996/3

Y1 - 1996/3

N2 - The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) has recommended diastolic area length and truncated ellipsoid methods for estimating left ventricular (LV) mass by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. The major goals of this retrospective study were to (1) assess the correlation between ASE-recommended 2D and M-mode echo-derived measurements of LV mass, (2) compare the two ASE-recommended 2D echocardiography methods, and (3) compare the echo-derived LV mass with anatomic LV mass. The study included 2D echocardiograms obtained within 30 days of death from 34 patients who subsequently underwent autopsy and 2D echocardiograms of 56 normal subjects. The formula used for measurement of M-mode echo-derived LV mass was LV mass = 0.8 (ASE-cube LV mass) + 0.6 gm. For 2D echo-derived LV mass, the ASE-recommended area length and truncated ellipsoid methods in systole and diastole were used, with and without incorporating the papillary muscles into the myocardial shell. LV mass derived by M-mode echocardiography was comparable to that derived by 2D methods, and it is reasonable to use this technique for normally shaped ventricles. When the papillary muscles were included into the myocardial shell, diastolic 2D methods overestimated autopsy LV mass. Both diastolic area length and truncated ellipsoid methods were comparable to autopsy LV mass. When the papillary muscles were excluded, the systolic area length method showed the best agreement with autopsy LV mass.

AB - The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) has recommended diastolic area length and truncated ellipsoid methods for estimating left ventricular (LV) mass by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. The major goals of this retrospective study were to (1) assess the correlation between ASE-recommended 2D and M-mode echo-derived measurements of LV mass, (2) compare the two ASE-recommended 2D echocardiography methods, and (3) compare the echo-derived LV mass with anatomic LV mass. The study included 2D echocardiograms obtained within 30 days of death from 34 patients who subsequently underwent autopsy and 2D echocardiograms of 56 normal subjects. The formula used for measurement of M-mode echo-derived LV mass was LV mass = 0.8 (ASE-cube LV mass) + 0.6 gm. For 2D echo-derived LV mass, the ASE-recommended area length and truncated ellipsoid methods in systole and diastole were used, with and without incorporating the papillary muscles into the myocardial shell. LV mass derived by M-mode echocardiography was comparable to that derived by 2D methods, and it is reasonable to use this technique for normally shaped ventricles. When the papillary muscles were included into the myocardial shell, diastolic 2D methods overestimated autopsy LV mass. Both diastolic area length and truncated ellipsoid methods were comparable to autopsy LV mass. When the papillary muscles were excluded, the systolic area length method showed the best agreement with autopsy LV mass.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030090050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030090050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 119

EP - 128

JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

JF - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

SN - 0894-7317

IS - 2

ER -