TY - JOUR
T1 - Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure in the hypertension optimal treatment (HOT) study
AU - Mancia, Giuseppe
AU - Omboni, Stefano
AU - Parati, Gianfranco
AU - Clement, Denis L.
AU - Haley, William E.
AU - Rahman, Syed Noor
AU - Hoogma, Raol P.L.M.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Background and aims The Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) study showed that when antihypertensive treatment reduces diastolic blood pressure well below 90 mmHg, there can be a further reduction of cardiovascular events, particularly myocardial infarction, with no evidence of a J-shaped curve at lower pressures. Office measurement, however, gives no information about blood pressure outside the office. This paper describes a HOT substudy in which patients underwent both office measurement and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Methods The mean age of the substudy population was 62 ± 7 years. Substudy patients were treated for a median period of 2 years. All received the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist felodipine, while some also received an ACE-inhibitor, a beta-blocker or a diuretic. Average 24 h, day and night ambulatory blood pressure values were computed at baseline (n = 277) and during treatment (n = 347): 112 patients had been randomized to a target office diastolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg, 117 to 85 mmHg and 118 to ≤ 80 mmHg. Additional analyses included computation of: (1) trough-to-peak ratio and (2) the smoothness index (the ratio between the average of the 24 hourly blood pressure reductions after treatment and its standard deviation). Results Taking the subgroup as a whole, baseline 24 h average blood pressures (146 ± 18/90 ± 10 mmHg) were significantly and markedly lower than office blood pressures (170 ± 14/105 ± 3 mmHg, P < 0.01). Office, 24 h, day and night blood pressures were all significantly reduced by treatment, but there was a smaller fall in ambulatory, than in office pressures. The between group differences in office blood pressure were smaller than those observed in the overall HOT sample. Between-group differences in 24 h blood pressure were even smaller. Trough-to-peak ratios and smoothness indices were lowest in the highest blood pressure target group and highest in the lowest blood pressure target group. Office and ambulatory blood pressures were similar in the groups randomized to placebo (n = 170) or acetylsalicylic acid (n = 177). Conclusion In conclusion, in the HOT study, treatment reduced not only office but also ambulatory blood pressure throughout the 24 h. The reduction was less marked for ambulatory than for office blood pressure.
AB - Background and aims The Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) study showed that when antihypertensive treatment reduces diastolic blood pressure well below 90 mmHg, there can be a further reduction of cardiovascular events, particularly myocardial infarction, with no evidence of a J-shaped curve at lower pressures. Office measurement, however, gives no information about blood pressure outside the office. This paper describes a HOT substudy in which patients underwent both office measurement and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Methods The mean age of the substudy population was 62 ± 7 years. Substudy patients were treated for a median period of 2 years. All received the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist felodipine, while some also received an ACE-inhibitor, a beta-blocker or a diuretic. Average 24 h, day and night ambulatory blood pressure values were computed at baseline (n = 277) and during treatment (n = 347): 112 patients had been randomized to a target office diastolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg, 117 to 85 mmHg and 118 to ≤ 80 mmHg. Additional analyses included computation of: (1) trough-to-peak ratio and (2) the smoothness index (the ratio between the average of the 24 hourly blood pressure reductions after treatment and its standard deviation). Results Taking the subgroup as a whole, baseline 24 h average blood pressures (146 ± 18/90 ± 10 mmHg) were significantly and markedly lower than office blood pressures (170 ± 14/105 ± 3 mmHg, P < 0.01). Office, 24 h, day and night blood pressures were all significantly reduced by treatment, but there was a smaller fall in ambulatory, than in office pressures. The between group differences in office blood pressure were smaller than those observed in the overall HOT sample. Between-group differences in 24 h blood pressure were even smaller. Trough-to-peak ratios and smoothness indices were lowest in the highest blood pressure target group and highest in the lowest blood pressure target group. Office and ambulatory blood pressures were similar in the groups randomized to placebo (n = 170) or acetylsalicylic acid (n = 177). Conclusion In conclusion, in the HOT study, treatment reduced not only office but also ambulatory blood pressure throughout the 24 h. The reduction was less marked for ambulatory than for office blood pressure.
KW - Ambulatory blood pressure
KW - Antihypertensive treatment
KW - Calcium-antagonists
KW - Office blood pressure
KW - Smoothness index
KW - Trough-to-peak ratio
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034809627&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034809627&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00004872-200110000-00008
DO - 10.1097/00004872-200110000-00008
M3 - Article
C2 - 11593094
AN - SCOPUS:0034809627
SN - 0263-6352
VL - 19
SP - 1755
EP - 1763
JO - Journal of Hypertension
JF - Journal of Hypertension
IS - 10
ER -