Training curriculum to help patient representatives participate meaningfully in the development of clinical practice guidelines

Lubna Daraz, Starr Webb, Rob Kunkle, Mohammad H Murad, Eddy Lang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Patient participation in the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is critical for validity and trust. Many guideline panels now include patient representatives. Engagement of these individuals may be improved by training them about the process and their role before they join a guideline panel. To aid patient representatives in engagement in the improvement of guidelines, we developed and implemented a curriculum. The curriculum was developed based on content from the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group and readability principles, and was delivered through a webinar followed by a face-to-face half a day workshop. Twenty-four patient representatives were recruited by the American Society of Hematology to serve on guideline panels. Barriers assessment was facilitated by a pre-curriculum survey. The curriculum targeted patient representatives' knowledge, skills and attitudes and was followed by actual engagement in a guideline panel and a post-curriculum survey. Participants reported that the combination of the two training methods was very useful (9/10 on the Likert scale) in increasing their knowledge about guideline development. They agreed that their skills and self-efficacy in developing guidelines improved (8/10). Their attitudes (confidence in their ability to participate) improved by 30% between the webinar and the workshop. They developed a script to use during panel deliberations and an instruction sheet for the guideline panel about how to empower and engage them as active participants in the guideline development process. The benefits of incorporating patients' voice in CPGs are multifold. These benefits may be optimised by providing patient representatives with training that addresses barriers to engagement and tools to increase their knowledge, skills and attitudes required for meaningful participation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalBMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Patient Advocacy
Practice Guidelines
Curriculum
Guidelines
Education
Patient Participation
Aptitude
Self Efficacy

Keywords

  • general medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Training curriculum to help patient representatives participate meaningfully in the development of clinical practice guidelines. / Daraz, Lubna; Webb, Starr; Kunkle, Rob; Murad, Mohammad H; Lang, Eddy.

In: BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{69610c88bb9c45a1b16caa08fd076643,
title = "Training curriculum to help patient representatives participate meaningfully in the development of clinical practice guidelines",
abstract = "Patient participation in the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is critical for validity and trust. Many guideline panels now include patient representatives. Engagement of these individuals may be improved by training them about the process and their role before they join a guideline panel. To aid patient representatives in engagement in the improvement of guidelines, we developed and implemented a curriculum. The curriculum was developed based on content from the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group and readability principles, and was delivered through a webinar followed by a face-to-face half a day workshop. Twenty-four patient representatives were recruited by the American Society of Hematology to serve on guideline panels. Barriers assessment was facilitated by a pre-curriculum survey. The curriculum targeted patient representatives' knowledge, skills and attitudes and was followed by actual engagement in a guideline panel and a post-curriculum survey. Participants reported that the combination of the two training methods was very useful (9/10 on the Likert scale) in increasing their knowledge about guideline development. They agreed that their skills and self-efficacy in developing guidelines improved (8/10). Their attitudes (confidence in their ability to participate) improved by 30{\%} between the webinar and the workshop. They developed a script to use during panel deliberations and an instruction sheet for the guideline panel about how to empower and engage them as active participants in the guideline development process. The benefits of incorporating patients' voice in CPGs are multifold. These benefits may be optimised by providing patient representatives with training that addresses barriers to engagement and tools to increase their knowledge, skills and attitudes required for meaningful participation.",
keywords = "general medicine",
author = "Lubna Daraz and Starr Webb and Rob Kunkle and Murad, {Mohammad H} and Eddy Lang",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111186",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine",
issn = "2515-446X",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Training curriculum to help patient representatives participate meaningfully in the development of clinical practice guidelines

AU - Daraz, Lubna

AU - Webb, Starr

AU - Kunkle, Rob

AU - Murad, Mohammad H

AU - Lang, Eddy

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Patient participation in the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is critical for validity and trust. Many guideline panels now include patient representatives. Engagement of these individuals may be improved by training them about the process and their role before they join a guideline panel. To aid patient representatives in engagement in the improvement of guidelines, we developed and implemented a curriculum. The curriculum was developed based on content from the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group and readability principles, and was delivered through a webinar followed by a face-to-face half a day workshop. Twenty-four patient representatives were recruited by the American Society of Hematology to serve on guideline panels. Barriers assessment was facilitated by a pre-curriculum survey. The curriculum targeted patient representatives' knowledge, skills and attitudes and was followed by actual engagement in a guideline panel and a post-curriculum survey. Participants reported that the combination of the two training methods was very useful (9/10 on the Likert scale) in increasing their knowledge about guideline development. They agreed that their skills and self-efficacy in developing guidelines improved (8/10). Their attitudes (confidence in their ability to participate) improved by 30% between the webinar and the workshop. They developed a script to use during panel deliberations and an instruction sheet for the guideline panel about how to empower and engage them as active participants in the guideline development process. The benefits of incorporating patients' voice in CPGs are multifold. These benefits may be optimised by providing patient representatives with training that addresses barriers to engagement and tools to increase their knowledge, skills and attitudes required for meaningful participation.

AB - Patient participation in the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is critical for validity and trust. Many guideline panels now include patient representatives. Engagement of these individuals may be improved by training them about the process and their role before they join a guideline panel. To aid patient representatives in engagement in the improvement of guidelines, we developed and implemented a curriculum. The curriculum was developed based on content from the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group and readability principles, and was delivered through a webinar followed by a face-to-face half a day workshop. Twenty-four patient representatives were recruited by the American Society of Hematology to serve on guideline panels. Barriers assessment was facilitated by a pre-curriculum survey. The curriculum targeted patient representatives' knowledge, skills and attitudes and was followed by actual engagement in a guideline panel and a post-curriculum survey. Participants reported that the combination of the two training methods was very useful (9/10 on the Likert scale) in increasing their knowledge about guideline development. They agreed that their skills and self-efficacy in developing guidelines improved (8/10). Their attitudes (confidence in their ability to participate) improved by 30% between the webinar and the workshop. They developed a script to use during panel deliberations and an instruction sheet for the guideline panel about how to empower and engage them as active participants in the guideline development process. The benefits of incorporating patients' voice in CPGs are multifold. These benefits may be optimised by providing patient representatives with training that addresses barriers to engagement and tools to increase their knowledge, skills and attitudes required for meaningful participation.

KW - general medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065387117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065387117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111186

DO - 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111186

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065387117

JO - BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine

JF - BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine

SN - 2515-446X

ER -