Three hundred consecutive emergent celiotomies in general surgery patients: Influence of advanced diagnostic imaging techniques and procedures on diagnosis

Grace S. Rozycki, Lorraine Tremblay, David V. Feliciano, Richard W Joseph, Pierre DeDelva, Jeffrey P. Salomone, Jeffrey M. Nicholas, Raymond A. Cava, Joseph D. Ansley, Walter L. Ingram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the utility of advanced tests performed before surgery on patients who needed emergent abdominal operations, and to assess the outcomes of these patients relative to their diagnoses. Summary Background Data: Patients with a potential abdominal catastrophe may have various presentations, contributing to the difficulty of the decision about whether an operation is indicated. Advanced tests can be valuable, but the use of these adjuncts should be appropriate to the clinical status of the patient so that treatment is not delayed. The role of these tools in the evaluation of the patient who may need an emergent abdominal operation is less well defined. Methods: Data were reviewed on adult patients undergoing emergent abdominal operations. Entrance criteria included patients who had an emergent abdominal operation, defined as one performed for presumed gastrointestinal perforation, infarction, or hemorrhage within 6 hours of admission or surgical consultation. Advanced tests were those that were time-consuming or invasive or required scheduling with other departments so that the risk/benefit ratio of these tests could be questioned. A useful test was one that provided information that contributed to a change in the patient's management. Results: During a 5-year period, 300 consecutive adult patients (158 perforations, 66 hemorrhage, 53 ischemia/infarction, and 23 "other") underwent emergent nontrauma celiotomies. Overall, the death rate was 20%. Advanced preoperative tests were performed in 135 (45%) of the 300 patients, and 40 of these patients had delayed treatments. Preoperative localization of bleeding sites was accomplished in 77% of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 86% of patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusions: Most patients in need of emergent abdominal operations should not undergo advanced tests. The primary role of advanced tests in these patients is in the localization of a bleeding site. With the exception of patients who present with hemorrhage, advanced tests frequently cause a delay in treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)681-689
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume235
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
Diagnostic Imaging
Hemorrhage
Infarction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Three hundred consecutive emergent celiotomies in general surgery patients : Influence of advanced diagnostic imaging techniques and procedures on diagnosis. / Rozycki, Grace S.; Tremblay, Lorraine; Feliciano, David V.; Joseph, Richard W; DeDelva, Pierre; Salomone, Jeffrey P.; Nicholas, Jeffrey M.; Cava, Raymond A.; Ansley, Joseph D.; Ingram, Walter L.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 235, No. 5, 2002, p. 681-689.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rozycki, GS, Tremblay, L, Feliciano, DV, Joseph, RW, DeDelva, P, Salomone, JP, Nicholas, JM, Cava, RA, Ansley, JD & Ingram, WL 2002, 'Three hundred consecutive emergent celiotomies in general surgery patients: Influence of advanced diagnostic imaging techniques and procedures on diagnosis', Annals of Surgery, vol. 235, no. 5, pp. 681-689. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200205000-00010
Rozycki, Grace S. ; Tremblay, Lorraine ; Feliciano, David V. ; Joseph, Richard W ; DeDelva, Pierre ; Salomone, Jeffrey P. ; Nicholas, Jeffrey M. ; Cava, Raymond A. ; Ansley, Joseph D. ; Ingram, Walter L. / Three hundred consecutive emergent celiotomies in general surgery patients : Influence of advanced diagnostic imaging techniques and procedures on diagnosis. In: Annals of Surgery. 2002 ; Vol. 235, No. 5. pp. 681-689.
@article{4fa18381a86b4246a90a2326f14941b7,
title = "Three hundred consecutive emergent celiotomies in general surgery patients: Influence of advanced diagnostic imaging techniques and procedures on diagnosis",
abstract = "Objectives: To assess the utility of advanced tests performed before surgery on patients who needed emergent abdominal operations, and to assess the outcomes of these patients relative to their diagnoses. Summary Background Data: Patients with a potential abdominal catastrophe may have various presentations, contributing to the difficulty of the decision about whether an operation is indicated. Advanced tests can be valuable, but the use of these adjuncts should be appropriate to the clinical status of the patient so that treatment is not delayed. The role of these tools in the evaluation of the patient who may need an emergent abdominal operation is less well defined. Methods: Data were reviewed on adult patients undergoing emergent abdominal operations. Entrance criteria included patients who had an emergent abdominal operation, defined as one performed for presumed gastrointestinal perforation, infarction, or hemorrhage within 6 hours of admission or surgical consultation. Advanced tests were those that were time-consuming or invasive or required scheduling with other departments so that the risk/benefit ratio of these tests could be questioned. A useful test was one that provided information that contributed to a change in the patient's management. Results: During a 5-year period, 300 consecutive adult patients (158 perforations, 66 hemorrhage, 53 ischemia/infarction, and 23 {"}other{"}) underwent emergent nontrauma celiotomies. Overall, the death rate was 20{\%}. Advanced preoperative tests were performed in 135 (45{\%}) of the 300 patients, and 40 of these patients had delayed treatments. Preoperative localization of bleeding sites was accomplished in 77{\%} of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 86{\%} of patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusions: Most patients in need of emergent abdominal operations should not undergo advanced tests. The primary role of advanced tests in these patients is in the localization of a bleeding site. With the exception of patients who present with hemorrhage, advanced tests frequently cause a delay in treatment.",
author = "Rozycki, {Grace S.} and Lorraine Tremblay and Feliciano, {David V.} and Joseph, {Richard W} and Pierre DeDelva and Salomone, {Jeffrey P.} and Nicholas, {Jeffrey M.} and Cava, {Raymond A.} and Ansley, {Joseph D.} and Ingram, {Walter L.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1097/00000658-200205000-00010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "235",
pages = "681--689",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three hundred consecutive emergent celiotomies in general surgery patients

T2 - Influence of advanced diagnostic imaging techniques and procedures on diagnosis

AU - Rozycki, Grace S.

AU - Tremblay, Lorraine

AU - Feliciano, David V.

AU - Joseph, Richard W

AU - DeDelva, Pierre

AU - Salomone, Jeffrey P.

AU - Nicholas, Jeffrey M.

AU - Cava, Raymond A.

AU - Ansley, Joseph D.

AU - Ingram, Walter L.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Objectives: To assess the utility of advanced tests performed before surgery on patients who needed emergent abdominal operations, and to assess the outcomes of these patients relative to their diagnoses. Summary Background Data: Patients with a potential abdominal catastrophe may have various presentations, contributing to the difficulty of the decision about whether an operation is indicated. Advanced tests can be valuable, but the use of these adjuncts should be appropriate to the clinical status of the patient so that treatment is not delayed. The role of these tools in the evaluation of the patient who may need an emergent abdominal operation is less well defined. Methods: Data were reviewed on adult patients undergoing emergent abdominal operations. Entrance criteria included patients who had an emergent abdominal operation, defined as one performed for presumed gastrointestinal perforation, infarction, or hemorrhage within 6 hours of admission or surgical consultation. Advanced tests were those that were time-consuming or invasive or required scheduling with other departments so that the risk/benefit ratio of these tests could be questioned. A useful test was one that provided information that contributed to a change in the patient's management. Results: During a 5-year period, 300 consecutive adult patients (158 perforations, 66 hemorrhage, 53 ischemia/infarction, and 23 "other") underwent emergent nontrauma celiotomies. Overall, the death rate was 20%. Advanced preoperative tests were performed in 135 (45%) of the 300 patients, and 40 of these patients had delayed treatments. Preoperative localization of bleeding sites was accomplished in 77% of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 86% of patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusions: Most patients in need of emergent abdominal operations should not undergo advanced tests. The primary role of advanced tests in these patients is in the localization of a bleeding site. With the exception of patients who present with hemorrhage, advanced tests frequently cause a delay in treatment.

AB - Objectives: To assess the utility of advanced tests performed before surgery on patients who needed emergent abdominal operations, and to assess the outcomes of these patients relative to their diagnoses. Summary Background Data: Patients with a potential abdominal catastrophe may have various presentations, contributing to the difficulty of the decision about whether an operation is indicated. Advanced tests can be valuable, but the use of these adjuncts should be appropriate to the clinical status of the patient so that treatment is not delayed. The role of these tools in the evaluation of the patient who may need an emergent abdominal operation is less well defined. Methods: Data were reviewed on adult patients undergoing emergent abdominal operations. Entrance criteria included patients who had an emergent abdominal operation, defined as one performed for presumed gastrointestinal perforation, infarction, or hemorrhage within 6 hours of admission or surgical consultation. Advanced tests were those that were time-consuming or invasive or required scheduling with other departments so that the risk/benefit ratio of these tests could be questioned. A useful test was one that provided information that contributed to a change in the patient's management. Results: During a 5-year period, 300 consecutive adult patients (158 perforations, 66 hemorrhage, 53 ischemia/infarction, and 23 "other") underwent emergent nontrauma celiotomies. Overall, the death rate was 20%. Advanced preoperative tests were performed in 135 (45%) of the 300 patients, and 40 of these patients had delayed treatments. Preoperative localization of bleeding sites was accomplished in 77% of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 86% of patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusions: Most patients in need of emergent abdominal operations should not undergo advanced tests. The primary role of advanced tests in these patients is in the localization of a bleeding site. With the exception of patients who present with hemorrhage, advanced tests frequently cause a delay in treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036240291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036240291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00000658-200205000-00010

DO - 10.1097/00000658-200205000-00010

M3 - Article

C2 - 11981214

AN - SCOPUS:0036240291

VL - 235

SP - 681

EP - 689

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 5

ER -