There are no facts, only interpretations

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This editorial refers to 'Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing three different devices for percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale', by M. Hornung et al., on page 3362 and 'Patent foramen ovale transcatheter closure vs. medical therapy on recurrent vascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials', by P. Rengifo-Moreno et al., on page 3342.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3336-3338
Number of pages3
JournalEuropean heart journal
Volume34
Issue number43
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 14 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'There are no facts, only interpretations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this