The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on follow-up after vascular surgery arterial procedures

R. Eugene Zierler, William D. Jordan, Brajesh K. Lal, Firas Mussa, Steven Leers, Joseph Fulton, William Pevec, Andrew Hill, Mohammad H Murad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although follow-up after open surgical and endovascular procedures is generally regarded as an important part of the care provided by vascular surgeons, there are no detailed or comprehensive guidelines that specify the optimal approaches with regard to testing methods, indications for reintervention, and follow-up intervals. To provide guidance to the vascular surgeon, the Clinical Practice Council of the Society for Vascular Surgery appointed an expert panel and a methodologist to review the current clinical evidence and to develop recommendations for follow-up after vascular surgery procedures. For those procedures for which high-quality evidence was not available, recommendations were based on observational studies, committee consensus, and indirect evidence. Recognizing that there are numerous published reports on the role of duplex ultrasound for surveillance of infrainguinal vein bypass grafts, the Society commissioned a systematic review and meta-analysis on this topic. The panel classified the strength of each recommendation and the corresponding quality of evidence on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system: recommendations were graded either strong or weak, and the quality of evidence was graded high, moderate, or low. The resulting recommendations represent a wide variety of open surgical and endovascular procedures involving the extracranial carotid artery, thoracic and abdominal aorta, mesenteric and renal arteries, and lower extremity arterial revascularization. The panel also identified many areas in which there was a lack of high-quality evidence to support their recommendations. This suggests that there are opportunities for further clinical research on testing methods, threshold criteria, and the role of surveillance as well as on the modes of failure and indications for reintervention after vascular surgery procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)256-284
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Practice Guidelines
Blood Vessels
Endovascular Procedures
Mesenteric Arteries
Abdominal Aorta
Renal Artery
Thoracic Aorta
Carotid Arteries
Observational Studies
Meta-Analysis
Lower Extremity
Veins
Guidelines
Transplants
Research
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Clinical guidelines
  • Duplex imaging
  • Postoperative follow-up
  • Surveillance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on follow-up after vascular surgery arterial procedures. / Zierler, R. Eugene; Jordan, William D.; Lal, Brajesh K.; Mussa, Firas; Leers, Steven; Fulton, Joseph; Pevec, William; Hill, Andrew; Murad, Mohammad H.

In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 68, No. 1, 01.07.2018, p. 256-284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zierler, R. Eugene ; Jordan, William D. ; Lal, Brajesh K. ; Mussa, Firas ; Leers, Steven ; Fulton, Joseph ; Pevec, William ; Hill, Andrew ; Murad, Mohammad H. / The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on follow-up after vascular surgery arterial procedures. In: Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 68, No. 1. pp. 256-284.
@article{058c455bf67248b4867cc288d1238842,
title = "The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on follow-up after vascular surgery arterial procedures",
abstract = "Although follow-up after open surgical and endovascular procedures is generally regarded as an important part of the care provided by vascular surgeons, there are no detailed or comprehensive guidelines that specify the optimal approaches with regard to testing methods, indications for reintervention, and follow-up intervals. To provide guidance to the vascular surgeon, the Clinical Practice Council of the Society for Vascular Surgery appointed an expert panel and a methodologist to review the current clinical evidence and to develop recommendations for follow-up after vascular surgery procedures. For those procedures for which high-quality evidence was not available, recommendations were based on observational studies, committee consensus, and indirect evidence. Recognizing that there are numerous published reports on the role of duplex ultrasound for surveillance of infrainguinal vein bypass grafts, the Society commissioned a systematic review and meta-analysis on this topic. The panel classified the strength of each recommendation and the corresponding quality of evidence on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system: recommendations were graded either strong or weak, and the quality of evidence was graded high, moderate, or low. The resulting recommendations represent a wide variety of open surgical and endovascular procedures involving the extracranial carotid artery, thoracic and abdominal aorta, mesenteric and renal arteries, and lower extremity arterial revascularization. The panel also identified many areas in which there was a lack of high-quality evidence to support their recommendations. This suggests that there are opportunities for further clinical research on testing methods, threshold criteria, and the role of surveillance as well as on the modes of failure and indications for reintervention after vascular surgery procedures.",
keywords = "Clinical guidelines, Duplex imaging, Postoperative follow-up, Surveillance",
author = "Zierler, {R. Eugene} and Jordan, {William D.} and Lal, {Brajesh K.} and Firas Mussa and Steven Leers and Joseph Fulton and William Pevec and Andrew Hill and Murad, {Mohammad H}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvs.2018.04.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "256--284",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on follow-up after vascular surgery arterial procedures

AU - Zierler, R. Eugene

AU - Jordan, William D.

AU - Lal, Brajesh K.

AU - Mussa, Firas

AU - Leers, Steven

AU - Fulton, Joseph

AU - Pevec, William

AU - Hill, Andrew

AU - Murad, Mohammad H

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Although follow-up after open surgical and endovascular procedures is generally regarded as an important part of the care provided by vascular surgeons, there are no detailed or comprehensive guidelines that specify the optimal approaches with regard to testing methods, indications for reintervention, and follow-up intervals. To provide guidance to the vascular surgeon, the Clinical Practice Council of the Society for Vascular Surgery appointed an expert panel and a methodologist to review the current clinical evidence and to develop recommendations for follow-up after vascular surgery procedures. For those procedures for which high-quality evidence was not available, recommendations were based on observational studies, committee consensus, and indirect evidence. Recognizing that there are numerous published reports on the role of duplex ultrasound for surveillance of infrainguinal vein bypass grafts, the Society commissioned a systematic review and meta-analysis on this topic. The panel classified the strength of each recommendation and the corresponding quality of evidence on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system: recommendations were graded either strong or weak, and the quality of evidence was graded high, moderate, or low. The resulting recommendations represent a wide variety of open surgical and endovascular procedures involving the extracranial carotid artery, thoracic and abdominal aorta, mesenteric and renal arteries, and lower extremity arterial revascularization. The panel also identified many areas in which there was a lack of high-quality evidence to support their recommendations. This suggests that there are opportunities for further clinical research on testing methods, threshold criteria, and the role of surveillance as well as on the modes of failure and indications for reintervention after vascular surgery procedures.

AB - Although follow-up after open surgical and endovascular procedures is generally regarded as an important part of the care provided by vascular surgeons, there are no detailed or comprehensive guidelines that specify the optimal approaches with regard to testing methods, indications for reintervention, and follow-up intervals. To provide guidance to the vascular surgeon, the Clinical Practice Council of the Society for Vascular Surgery appointed an expert panel and a methodologist to review the current clinical evidence and to develop recommendations for follow-up after vascular surgery procedures. For those procedures for which high-quality evidence was not available, recommendations were based on observational studies, committee consensus, and indirect evidence. Recognizing that there are numerous published reports on the role of duplex ultrasound for surveillance of infrainguinal vein bypass grafts, the Society commissioned a systematic review and meta-analysis on this topic. The panel classified the strength of each recommendation and the corresponding quality of evidence on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system: recommendations were graded either strong or weak, and the quality of evidence was graded high, moderate, or low. The resulting recommendations represent a wide variety of open surgical and endovascular procedures involving the extracranial carotid artery, thoracic and abdominal aorta, mesenteric and renal arteries, and lower extremity arterial revascularization. The panel also identified many areas in which there was a lack of high-quality evidence to support their recommendations. This suggests that there are opportunities for further clinical research on testing methods, threshold criteria, and the role of surveillance as well as on the modes of failure and indications for reintervention after vascular surgery procedures.

KW - Clinical guidelines

KW - Duplex imaging

KW - Postoperative follow-up

KW - Surveillance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048601481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048601481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.04.018

DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.04.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 29937033

AN - SCOPUS:85048601481

VL - 68

SP - 256

EP - 284

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 1

ER -