The montreal cognitive assessment and the mini-mental state examination as screening instruments for cognitive impairment: Item analyses and threshold scores

Anne M. Damian, Sandra A. Jacobson, Joseph G. Hentz, Christine M. Belden, Holly A. Shill, Marwan N. Sabbagh, John Nathaniel Caviness, Charles Howard Adler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

139 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: To perform an item analysis of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) versus the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in the prediction of cognitive impairment, and to examine the characteristics of different MoCA threshold scores. Methods: 135 subjects enrolled in a longitudinal clinicopathologic study were administered the MoCA by a single physician and the MMSE by a trained research assistant. Subjects were classified as cognitively impaired or cognitively normal based on independent neuropsychological testing. Results: 89 subjects were found to be cognitively normal, and 46 cognitively impaired (20 with dementia, 26 with mild cognitive impairment). The MoCA was superior in both sensitivity and specificity to the MMSE, although not all MoCA tasks were of equal predictive value. A MoCA threshold score of 26 had a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 52% in this population. In a population with a 20% prevalence of cognitive impairment, a threshold of 24 was optimal (negative predictive value 96%, positive predictive value 47%). Conclusion: This analysis suggests the potential for creating an abbreviated MoCA. For screening in primary care, the MoCA threshold of 26 appears optimal. For testing in a memory disorders clinic, a lower threshold has better predictive value.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-131
Number of pages6
JournalDementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Memory Disorders
Population
Longitudinal Studies
Dementia
Primary Health Care
Physicians
Sensitivity and Specificity
Research
Cognitive Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Mild cognitive impairment
  • Mini-Mental State Examination
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

The montreal cognitive assessment and the mini-mental state examination as screening instruments for cognitive impairment : Item analyses and threshold scores. / Damian, Anne M.; Jacobson, Sandra A.; Hentz, Joseph G.; Belden, Christine M.; Shill, Holly A.; Sabbagh, Marwan N.; Caviness, John Nathaniel; Adler, Charles Howard.

In: Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, Vol. 31, No. 2, 03.2011, p. 126-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{469d79a35b7c45d8a7b281f7d20908d3,
title = "The montreal cognitive assessment and the mini-mental state examination as screening instruments for cognitive impairment: Item analyses and threshold scores",
abstract = "Aims: To perform an item analysis of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) versus the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in the prediction of cognitive impairment, and to examine the characteristics of different MoCA threshold scores. Methods: 135 subjects enrolled in a longitudinal clinicopathologic study were administered the MoCA by a single physician and the MMSE by a trained research assistant. Subjects were classified as cognitively impaired or cognitively normal based on independent neuropsychological testing. Results: 89 subjects were found to be cognitively normal, and 46 cognitively impaired (20 with dementia, 26 with mild cognitive impairment). The MoCA was superior in both sensitivity and specificity to the MMSE, although not all MoCA tasks were of equal predictive value. A MoCA threshold score of 26 had a sensitivity of 98{\%} and a specificity of 52{\%} in this population. In a population with a 20{\%} prevalence of cognitive impairment, a threshold of 24 was optimal (negative predictive value 96{\%}, positive predictive value 47{\%}). Conclusion: This analysis suggests the potential for creating an abbreviated MoCA. For screening in primary care, the MoCA threshold of 26 appears optimal. For testing in a memory disorders clinic, a lower threshold has better predictive value.",
keywords = "Alzheimer's disease, Mild cognitive impairment, Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment",
author = "Damian, {Anne M.} and Jacobson, {Sandra A.} and Hentz, {Joseph G.} and Belden, {Christine M.} and Shill, {Holly A.} and Sabbagh, {Marwan N.} and Caviness, {John Nathaniel} and Adler, {Charles Howard}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1159/000323867",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "126--131",
journal = "Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders",
issn = "1420-8008",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The montreal cognitive assessment and the mini-mental state examination as screening instruments for cognitive impairment

T2 - Item analyses and threshold scores

AU - Damian, Anne M.

AU - Jacobson, Sandra A.

AU - Hentz, Joseph G.

AU - Belden, Christine M.

AU - Shill, Holly A.

AU - Sabbagh, Marwan N.

AU - Caviness, John Nathaniel

AU - Adler, Charles Howard

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Aims: To perform an item analysis of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) versus the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in the prediction of cognitive impairment, and to examine the characteristics of different MoCA threshold scores. Methods: 135 subjects enrolled in a longitudinal clinicopathologic study were administered the MoCA by a single physician and the MMSE by a trained research assistant. Subjects were classified as cognitively impaired or cognitively normal based on independent neuropsychological testing. Results: 89 subjects were found to be cognitively normal, and 46 cognitively impaired (20 with dementia, 26 with mild cognitive impairment). The MoCA was superior in both sensitivity and specificity to the MMSE, although not all MoCA tasks were of equal predictive value. A MoCA threshold score of 26 had a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 52% in this population. In a population with a 20% prevalence of cognitive impairment, a threshold of 24 was optimal (negative predictive value 96%, positive predictive value 47%). Conclusion: This analysis suggests the potential for creating an abbreviated MoCA. For screening in primary care, the MoCA threshold of 26 appears optimal. For testing in a memory disorders clinic, a lower threshold has better predictive value.

AB - Aims: To perform an item analysis of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) versus the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in the prediction of cognitive impairment, and to examine the characteristics of different MoCA threshold scores. Methods: 135 subjects enrolled in a longitudinal clinicopathologic study were administered the MoCA by a single physician and the MMSE by a trained research assistant. Subjects were classified as cognitively impaired or cognitively normal based on independent neuropsychological testing. Results: 89 subjects were found to be cognitively normal, and 46 cognitively impaired (20 with dementia, 26 with mild cognitive impairment). The MoCA was superior in both sensitivity and specificity to the MMSE, although not all MoCA tasks were of equal predictive value. A MoCA threshold score of 26 had a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 52% in this population. In a population with a 20% prevalence of cognitive impairment, a threshold of 24 was optimal (negative predictive value 96%, positive predictive value 47%). Conclusion: This analysis suggests the potential for creating an abbreviated MoCA. For screening in primary care, the MoCA threshold of 26 appears optimal. For testing in a memory disorders clinic, a lower threshold has better predictive value.

KW - Alzheimer's disease

KW - Mild cognitive impairment

KW - Mini-Mental State Examination

KW - Montreal Cognitive Assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251537166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79251537166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000323867

DO - 10.1159/000323867

M3 - Article

C2 - 21282950

AN - SCOPUS:79251537166

VL - 31

SP - 126

EP - 131

JO - Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

JF - Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

SN - 1420-8008

IS - 2

ER -