The male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: Mean followup of 18 months

Erik P Castle, Paul E. Andrews, Nancy Itano, Donald E. Novicki, Scott K. Swanson, Robert G. Ferrigni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

109 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We review our experience with 42 consecutive patients undergoing the bone anchored male sling procedure. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed, and complete data and followup were available in 38 of the 42 patients. Success was defined as wearing 1 thin pad or less per day, or social continence. Variables such as severity of incontinence, age, detrusor overactivity, previous artificial urinary sphincter, history of radiation and intraoperative flow pressures were analyzed for success and risk of failure. Results: With a mean followup of 18 months (range 6 to 26), 39.5% (15 of 38) were considered a success (socially continent). A statistically significant trend in the degree of preoperative incontinence predicting success was identified. Social continence in mild, moderate and severe cases was achieved in 67%, 50% and 0%, respectively (p =0.001/95% CI). Only 15.8% of patients were completely dry and not wearing pads. Significant perineal pain was reported in the early postoperative period but resolved in all patients. Infection occurred in 3 patients with erosion found in 1. Conclusions: Although these results are not as encouraging as previous reports, carefully selected patients with mild to moderate incontinence are good candidates for the male sling. Patients with a history of radiation, previous artificial urinary sphincter or severe incontinence should be counseled about the higher risk of treatment failure. Patients should be informed of the possibility of progressive failure with time and the occurrence of significant perineal pain in the early postoperative period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1657-1660
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume173
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005

Fingerprint

Suburethral Slings
Prostatectomy
Artificial Urinary Sphincter
Postoperative Period
Radiation
Pain
Treatment Failure
Pressure
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • Male
  • Prostatectomy/ adverse effects
  • Prostheses and implants
  • Stress/surgery; treatment outcome
  • Urinary incontinence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Castle, E. P., Andrews, P. E., Itano, N., Novicki, D. E., Swanson, S. K., & Ferrigni, R. G. (2005). The male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: Mean followup of 18 months. Journal of Urology, 173(5), 1657-1660. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000154782.86431.41

The male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence : Mean followup of 18 months. / Castle, Erik P; Andrews, Paul E.; Itano, Nancy; Novicki, Donald E.; Swanson, Scott K.; Ferrigni, Robert G.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 173, No. 5, 05.2005, p. 1657-1660.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Castle, EP, Andrews, PE, Itano, N, Novicki, DE, Swanson, SK & Ferrigni, RG 2005, 'The male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: Mean followup of 18 months', Journal of Urology, vol. 173, no. 5, pp. 1657-1660. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000154782.86431.41
Castle, Erik P ; Andrews, Paul E. ; Itano, Nancy ; Novicki, Donald E. ; Swanson, Scott K. ; Ferrigni, Robert G. / The male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence : Mean followup of 18 months. In: Journal of Urology. 2005 ; Vol. 173, No. 5. pp. 1657-1660.
@article{a8b974b063354d499cb9f2ae32622be4,
title = "The male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: Mean followup of 18 months",
abstract = "Purpose: We review our experience with 42 consecutive patients undergoing the bone anchored male sling procedure. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed, and complete data and followup were available in 38 of the 42 patients. Success was defined as wearing 1 thin pad or less per day, or social continence. Variables such as severity of incontinence, age, detrusor overactivity, previous artificial urinary sphincter, history of radiation and intraoperative flow pressures were analyzed for success and risk of failure. Results: With a mean followup of 18 months (range 6 to 26), 39.5{\%} (15 of 38) were considered a success (socially continent). A statistically significant trend in the degree of preoperative incontinence predicting success was identified. Social continence in mild, moderate and severe cases was achieved in 67{\%}, 50{\%} and 0{\%}, respectively (p =0.001/95{\%} CI). Only 15.8{\%} of patients were completely dry and not wearing pads. Significant perineal pain was reported in the early postoperative period but resolved in all patients. Infection occurred in 3 patients with erosion found in 1. Conclusions: Although these results are not as encouraging as previous reports, carefully selected patients with mild to moderate incontinence are good candidates for the male sling. Patients with a history of radiation, previous artificial urinary sphincter or severe incontinence should be counseled about the higher risk of treatment failure. Patients should be informed of the possibility of progressive failure with time and the occurrence of significant perineal pain in the early postoperative period.",
keywords = "Male, Prostatectomy/ adverse effects, Prostheses and implants, Stress/surgery; treatment outcome, Urinary incontinence",
author = "Castle, {Erik P} and Andrews, {Paul E.} and Nancy Itano and Novicki, {Donald E.} and Swanson, {Scott K.} and Ferrigni, {Robert G.}",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/01.ju.0000154782.86431.41",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "173",
pages = "1657--1660",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence

T2 - Mean followup of 18 months

AU - Castle, Erik P

AU - Andrews, Paul E.

AU - Itano, Nancy

AU - Novicki, Donald E.

AU - Swanson, Scott K.

AU - Ferrigni, Robert G.

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - Purpose: We review our experience with 42 consecutive patients undergoing the bone anchored male sling procedure. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed, and complete data and followup were available in 38 of the 42 patients. Success was defined as wearing 1 thin pad or less per day, or social continence. Variables such as severity of incontinence, age, detrusor overactivity, previous artificial urinary sphincter, history of radiation and intraoperative flow pressures were analyzed for success and risk of failure. Results: With a mean followup of 18 months (range 6 to 26), 39.5% (15 of 38) were considered a success (socially continent). A statistically significant trend in the degree of preoperative incontinence predicting success was identified. Social continence in mild, moderate and severe cases was achieved in 67%, 50% and 0%, respectively (p =0.001/95% CI). Only 15.8% of patients were completely dry and not wearing pads. Significant perineal pain was reported in the early postoperative period but resolved in all patients. Infection occurred in 3 patients with erosion found in 1. Conclusions: Although these results are not as encouraging as previous reports, carefully selected patients with mild to moderate incontinence are good candidates for the male sling. Patients with a history of radiation, previous artificial urinary sphincter or severe incontinence should be counseled about the higher risk of treatment failure. Patients should be informed of the possibility of progressive failure with time and the occurrence of significant perineal pain in the early postoperative period.

AB - Purpose: We review our experience with 42 consecutive patients undergoing the bone anchored male sling procedure. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed, and complete data and followup were available in 38 of the 42 patients. Success was defined as wearing 1 thin pad or less per day, or social continence. Variables such as severity of incontinence, age, detrusor overactivity, previous artificial urinary sphincter, history of radiation and intraoperative flow pressures were analyzed for success and risk of failure. Results: With a mean followup of 18 months (range 6 to 26), 39.5% (15 of 38) were considered a success (socially continent). A statistically significant trend in the degree of preoperative incontinence predicting success was identified. Social continence in mild, moderate and severe cases was achieved in 67%, 50% and 0%, respectively (p =0.001/95% CI). Only 15.8% of patients were completely dry and not wearing pads. Significant perineal pain was reported in the early postoperative period but resolved in all patients. Infection occurred in 3 patients with erosion found in 1. Conclusions: Although these results are not as encouraging as previous reports, carefully selected patients with mild to moderate incontinence are good candidates for the male sling. Patients with a history of radiation, previous artificial urinary sphincter or severe incontinence should be counseled about the higher risk of treatment failure. Patients should be informed of the possibility of progressive failure with time and the occurrence of significant perineal pain in the early postoperative period.

KW - Male

KW - Prostatectomy/ adverse effects

KW - Prostheses and implants

KW - Stress/surgery; treatment outcome

KW - Urinary incontinence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17144407658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17144407658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ju.0000154782.86431.41

DO - 10.1097/01.ju.0000154782.86431.41

M3 - Article

C2 - 15821530

AN - SCOPUS:17144407658

VL - 173

SP - 1657

EP - 1660

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 5

ER -