The International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR): Design, methods, baseline characteristics, and acute results

Gregory Barsness, David Holmes, Arthur M. Feldman, Richard Holubkov, Sheryl F. Kelsey, Elizabeth D. Kennard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In 1998, the International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR) was organized to document patient characteristics, safety, and efficacy during the treatment period, and long-term outcomes. All centers with EECP facilities were invited to join the voluntary Registry. The Registry population comprises all patients starting EECP therapy for treatment of angina pectoris in participating centers. Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to determine whether EECP is a safe and effective treatment for patients with angina pectoris regardless of their suitability for revascularization by more conventional techniques. Methods: After 18 months of operation, 43 clinical centers representing over half of clinical sites using the EECP system contributed cases. The data reported here were collected before the first EECP treatment and upon completion of final treatment. EECP can be used for patients ineligible for either coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as well as for those who prefer noninvasive treatment to avoid or delay revascularization. In this report, patients considered to be candidates for revascularization are compared with those not considered suitable. Results: Of the 978 patients analyzed, 70% had Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification class III or IV angina before starting treatment, and 62% used nitroglycerin. Most (81%) had been previously revascularized, and 69% were considered unsuited for either PCI or CABG at the time of starting EECP. A full treatment course (usually 35 h) was completed in 86%, of whom 81% reported improvement of at least one angina class immediately after the last treatment. Conclusion: In a broad patient population, EECP has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)435-442
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Cardiology
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Registries
Therapeutics
Angina Pectoris
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Coronary Artery Bypass
Transplants
Nitroglycerin
Patient Safety
Population

Keywords

  • Angina pectoris
  • Coronary artery disease
  • External counterpulsation
  • Registry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

The International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR) : Design, methods, baseline characteristics, and acute results. / Barsness, Gregory; Holmes, David; Feldman, Arthur M.; Holubkov, Richard; Kelsey, Sheryl F.; Kennard, Elizabeth D.

In: Clinical Cardiology, Vol. 24, No. 6, 01.01.2001, p. 435-442.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barsness, Gregory ; Holmes, David ; Feldman, Arthur M. ; Holubkov, Richard ; Kelsey, Sheryl F. ; Kennard, Elizabeth D. / The International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR) : Design, methods, baseline characteristics, and acute results. In: Clinical Cardiology. 2001 ; Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 435-442.
@article{b25f62b461884bb6a943486c1d8b782a,
title = "The International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR): Design, methods, baseline characteristics, and acute results",
abstract = "Background: In 1998, the International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR) was organized to document patient characteristics, safety, and efficacy during the treatment period, and long-term outcomes. All centers with EECP facilities were invited to join the voluntary Registry. The Registry population comprises all patients starting EECP therapy for treatment of angina pectoris in participating centers. Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to determine whether EECP is a safe and effective treatment for patients with angina pectoris regardless of their suitability for revascularization by more conventional techniques. Methods: After 18 months of operation, 43 clinical centers representing over half of clinical sites using the EECP system contributed cases. The data reported here were collected before the first EECP treatment and upon completion of final treatment. EECP can be used for patients ineligible for either coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as well as for those who prefer noninvasive treatment to avoid or delay revascularization. In this report, patients considered to be candidates for revascularization are compared with those not considered suitable. Results: Of the 978 patients analyzed, 70{\%} had Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification class III or IV angina before starting treatment, and 62{\%} used nitroglycerin. Most (81{\%}) had been previously revascularized, and 69{\%} were considered unsuited for either PCI or CABG at the time of starting EECP. A full treatment course (usually 35 h) was completed in 86{\%}, of whom 81{\%} reported improvement of at least one angina class immediately after the last treatment. Conclusion: In a broad patient population, EECP has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment.",
keywords = "Angina pectoris, Coronary artery disease, External counterpulsation, Registry",
author = "Gregory Barsness and David Holmes and Feldman, {Arthur M.} and Richard Holubkov and Kelsey, {Sheryl F.} and Kennard, {Elizabeth D.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/clc.4960240604",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "435--442",
journal = "Clinical Cardiology",
issn = "0160-9289",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR)

T2 - Design, methods, baseline characteristics, and acute results

AU - Barsness, Gregory

AU - Holmes, David

AU - Feldman, Arthur M.

AU - Holubkov, Richard

AU - Kelsey, Sheryl F.

AU - Kennard, Elizabeth D.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Background: In 1998, the International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR) was organized to document patient characteristics, safety, and efficacy during the treatment period, and long-term outcomes. All centers with EECP facilities were invited to join the voluntary Registry. The Registry population comprises all patients starting EECP therapy for treatment of angina pectoris in participating centers. Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to determine whether EECP is a safe and effective treatment for patients with angina pectoris regardless of their suitability for revascularization by more conventional techniques. Methods: After 18 months of operation, 43 clinical centers representing over half of clinical sites using the EECP system contributed cases. The data reported here were collected before the first EECP treatment and upon completion of final treatment. EECP can be used for patients ineligible for either coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as well as for those who prefer noninvasive treatment to avoid or delay revascularization. In this report, patients considered to be candidates for revascularization are compared with those not considered suitable. Results: Of the 978 patients analyzed, 70% had Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification class III or IV angina before starting treatment, and 62% used nitroglycerin. Most (81%) had been previously revascularized, and 69% were considered unsuited for either PCI or CABG at the time of starting EECP. A full treatment course (usually 35 h) was completed in 86%, of whom 81% reported improvement of at least one angina class immediately after the last treatment. Conclusion: In a broad patient population, EECP has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment.

AB - Background: In 1998, the International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR) was organized to document patient characteristics, safety, and efficacy during the treatment period, and long-term outcomes. All centers with EECP facilities were invited to join the voluntary Registry. The Registry population comprises all patients starting EECP therapy for treatment of angina pectoris in participating centers. Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to determine whether EECP is a safe and effective treatment for patients with angina pectoris regardless of their suitability for revascularization by more conventional techniques. Methods: After 18 months of operation, 43 clinical centers representing over half of clinical sites using the EECP system contributed cases. The data reported here were collected before the first EECP treatment and upon completion of final treatment. EECP can be used for patients ineligible for either coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as well as for those who prefer noninvasive treatment to avoid or delay revascularization. In this report, patients considered to be candidates for revascularization are compared with those not considered suitable. Results: Of the 978 patients analyzed, 70% had Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification class III or IV angina before starting treatment, and 62% used nitroglycerin. Most (81%) had been previously revascularized, and 69% were considered unsuited for either PCI or CABG at the time of starting EECP. A full treatment course (usually 35 h) was completed in 86%, of whom 81% reported improvement of at least one angina class immediately after the last treatment. Conclusion: In a broad patient population, EECP has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment.

KW - Angina pectoris

KW - Coronary artery disease

KW - External counterpulsation

KW - Registry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034983389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034983389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/clc.4960240604

DO - 10.1002/clc.4960240604

M3 - Article

C2 - 11403504

AN - SCOPUS:0034983389

VL - 24

SP - 435

EP - 442

JO - Clinical Cardiology

JF - Clinical Cardiology

SN - 0160-9289

IS - 6

ER -