The influence of preservation injury on rejection in the hepatic transplant recipient

T. K. Howard, G. B G Klintmalm, J. B. Cofer, B. S. Husberg, R. M. Goldstein, T. A. Gonwa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

224 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The records of 215 liver transplant recipients were reviewed and the degree of preservation injury was estimated by the initial aminotransferase levels. This was compared with the incidence of rejection found in the subsequent 30 days. Those with aspartate aminotransferase >2000 U/L were classified as having severe preservation injury while those with ASAT <600 U/L were considered to have had minimal preservation injury. There were no significant differences between these groups in recipient age, sex, cold ischemia time, preoperative physical status, panel-reactive antibodies, or cytotoxic crossmatch. The solution used for organ preservation and the donor age were the only factors that were found to be significantly different between the groups. Older donors were more common in the severe preservation injury group. Severe preservation injury was found more frequently in grafts preserved in Eurocollins solution and the group with minimal preservation injury more frequently used Wisconsin solution. There was significantly more rejection seen in the severe preservation injury group (71%) than in the group without preservation injury (33%). Although there was more rejection in the severe preservation injury group, the rejections were not more severe as judged by the need for multiple courses of therapy or the need for OKT3. Recurrent rejection was also not more frequent in either group. Graft survival was worse in the severe preservation injury group, with a significant increase in early graft loss, but no difference in the frequency of chronic rejection. Recovery of graft function was also delayed in the preservation injury group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-107
Number of pages5
JournalTransplantation
Volume49
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Liver
Wounds and Injuries
Transplants
Transplant Recipients
Tissue Donors
Cold Ischemia
Muromonab-CD3
Recovery of Function
Graft Survival
Aspartate Aminotransferases
Transaminases
Antibodies
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Howard, T. K., Klintmalm, G. B. G., Cofer, J. B., Husberg, B. S., Goldstein, R. M., & Gonwa, T. A. (1990). The influence of preservation injury on rejection in the hepatic transplant recipient. Transplantation, 49(1), 103-107.

The influence of preservation injury on rejection in the hepatic transplant recipient. / Howard, T. K.; Klintmalm, G. B G; Cofer, J. B.; Husberg, B. S.; Goldstein, R. M.; Gonwa, T. A.

In: Transplantation, Vol. 49, No. 1, 1990, p. 103-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Howard, TK, Klintmalm, GBG, Cofer, JB, Husberg, BS, Goldstein, RM & Gonwa, TA 1990, 'The influence of preservation injury on rejection in the hepatic transplant recipient', Transplantation, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 103-107.
Howard TK, Klintmalm GBG, Cofer JB, Husberg BS, Goldstein RM, Gonwa TA. The influence of preservation injury on rejection in the hepatic transplant recipient. Transplantation. 1990;49(1):103-107.
Howard, T. K. ; Klintmalm, G. B G ; Cofer, J. B. ; Husberg, B. S. ; Goldstein, R. M. ; Gonwa, T. A. / The influence of preservation injury on rejection in the hepatic transplant recipient. In: Transplantation. 1990 ; Vol. 49, No. 1. pp. 103-107.
@article{6bc200ecd61b4124b2b0587d17bacf6a,
title = "The influence of preservation injury on rejection in the hepatic transplant recipient",
abstract = "The records of 215 liver transplant recipients were reviewed and the degree of preservation injury was estimated by the initial aminotransferase levels. This was compared with the incidence of rejection found in the subsequent 30 days. Those with aspartate aminotransferase >2000 U/L were classified as having severe preservation injury while those with ASAT <600 U/L were considered to have had minimal preservation injury. There were no significant differences between these groups in recipient age, sex, cold ischemia time, preoperative physical status, panel-reactive antibodies, or cytotoxic crossmatch. The solution used for organ preservation and the donor age were the only factors that were found to be significantly different between the groups. Older donors were more common in the severe preservation injury group. Severe preservation injury was found more frequently in grafts preserved in Eurocollins solution and the group with minimal preservation injury more frequently used Wisconsin solution. There was significantly more rejection seen in the severe preservation injury group (71{\%}) than in the group without preservation injury (33{\%}). Although there was more rejection in the severe preservation injury group, the rejections were not more severe as judged by the need for multiple courses of therapy or the need for OKT3. Recurrent rejection was also not more frequent in either group. Graft survival was worse in the severe preservation injury group, with a significant increase in early graft loss, but no difference in the frequency of chronic rejection. Recovery of graft function was also delayed in the preservation injury group.",
author = "Howard, {T. K.} and Klintmalm, {G. B G} and Cofer, {J. B.} and Husberg, {B. S.} and Goldstein, {R. M.} and Gonwa, {T. A.}",
year = "1990",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "103--107",
journal = "Transplantation",
issn = "0041-1337",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of preservation injury on rejection in the hepatic transplant recipient

AU - Howard, T. K.

AU - Klintmalm, G. B G

AU - Cofer, J. B.

AU - Husberg, B. S.

AU - Goldstein, R. M.

AU - Gonwa, T. A.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - The records of 215 liver transplant recipients were reviewed and the degree of preservation injury was estimated by the initial aminotransferase levels. This was compared with the incidence of rejection found in the subsequent 30 days. Those with aspartate aminotransferase >2000 U/L were classified as having severe preservation injury while those with ASAT <600 U/L were considered to have had minimal preservation injury. There were no significant differences between these groups in recipient age, sex, cold ischemia time, preoperative physical status, panel-reactive antibodies, or cytotoxic crossmatch. The solution used for organ preservation and the donor age were the only factors that were found to be significantly different between the groups. Older donors were more common in the severe preservation injury group. Severe preservation injury was found more frequently in grafts preserved in Eurocollins solution and the group with minimal preservation injury more frequently used Wisconsin solution. There was significantly more rejection seen in the severe preservation injury group (71%) than in the group without preservation injury (33%). Although there was more rejection in the severe preservation injury group, the rejections were not more severe as judged by the need for multiple courses of therapy or the need for OKT3. Recurrent rejection was also not more frequent in either group. Graft survival was worse in the severe preservation injury group, with a significant increase in early graft loss, but no difference in the frequency of chronic rejection. Recovery of graft function was also delayed in the preservation injury group.

AB - The records of 215 liver transplant recipients were reviewed and the degree of preservation injury was estimated by the initial aminotransferase levels. This was compared with the incidence of rejection found in the subsequent 30 days. Those with aspartate aminotransferase >2000 U/L were classified as having severe preservation injury while those with ASAT <600 U/L were considered to have had minimal preservation injury. There were no significant differences between these groups in recipient age, sex, cold ischemia time, preoperative physical status, panel-reactive antibodies, or cytotoxic crossmatch. The solution used for organ preservation and the donor age were the only factors that were found to be significantly different between the groups. Older donors were more common in the severe preservation injury group. Severe preservation injury was found more frequently in grafts preserved in Eurocollins solution and the group with minimal preservation injury more frequently used Wisconsin solution. There was significantly more rejection seen in the severe preservation injury group (71%) than in the group without preservation injury (33%). Although there was more rejection in the severe preservation injury group, the rejections were not more severe as judged by the need for multiple courses of therapy or the need for OKT3. Recurrent rejection was also not more frequent in either group. Graft survival was worse in the severe preservation injury group, with a significant increase in early graft loss, but no difference in the frequency of chronic rejection. Recovery of graft function was also delayed in the preservation injury group.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025056990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025056990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2300999

AN - SCOPUS:0025056990

VL - 49

SP - 103

EP - 107

JO - Transplantation

JF - Transplantation

SN - 0041-1337

IS - 1

ER -