The effect of tissue fixation and processing on breast cancer size

Bobbi Pritt, Joseph J. Tessitore, Donald L. Weaver, Hagen Blaszyk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Precise measurement of an invasive breast cancer is crucial for pathological staging and subsequent patient management. Formalin fixation and histological processing may change tissue size, but there is no agreement on which state of the specimen, fresh or fixed, should be used for final tumor measurement. To determine the influence of fixation and processing on breast tumor size, a specific 1-dimensional measurement from 50 invasive breast tumors was recorded in fresh, fixed, and processed/mounted states. Tumors varied in maximum measured dimension from 4 to 20 mm and contained 10% to 90% estimated fibrous tissue (mean, 52.8%). In 96% of cases, there was no difference in measured size between fresh and fixed states. After final processing and mounting, a decrease in size from initial fresh measurement was noted in 40% of cases (mean difference, 2.4 mm; maximum difference, 7 mm). In 9 cases (18%), the measured size increased by a maximum of 3 mm (mean, 1.7 mm) after processing/mounting. Twenty-one cases (42%) showed no change in measurement during the entire fixation and processing protocol. Increases in measured size were attributed largely to tissue expansion during histological sectioning/mounting. One can arguably measure the size of an invasive breast cancer from either the fresh or fixed state without affecting accuracy, but caution should be exercised in relying solely on the microscopic measurements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)756-760
Number of pages5
JournalHuman Pathology
Volume36
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tissue Fixation
Breast Neoplasms
Tissue Expansion
Formaldehyde
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Breast
  • Cancer
  • Fixation
  • Formalin
  • Measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Pritt, B., Tessitore, J. J., Weaver, D. L., & Blaszyk, H. (2005). The effect of tissue fixation and processing on breast cancer size. Human Pathology, 36(7), 756-760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2005.04.018

The effect of tissue fixation and processing on breast cancer size. / Pritt, Bobbi; Tessitore, Joseph J.; Weaver, Donald L.; Blaszyk, Hagen.

In: Human Pathology, Vol. 36, No. 7, 07.2005, p. 756-760.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pritt, B, Tessitore, JJ, Weaver, DL & Blaszyk, H 2005, 'The effect of tissue fixation and processing on breast cancer size', Human Pathology, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 756-760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2005.04.018
Pritt, Bobbi ; Tessitore, Joseph J. ; Weaver, Donald L. ; Blaszyk, Hagen. / The effect of tissue fixation and processing on breast cancer size. In: Human Pathology. 2005 ; Vol. 36, No. 7. pp. 756-760.
@article{8e2c5559aa9b44e9b209e6fbb667d0d4,
title = "The effect of tissue fixation and processing on breast cancer size",
abstract = "Precise measurement of an invasive breast cancer is crucial for pathological staging and subsequent patient management. Formalin fixation and histological processing may change tissue size, but there is no agreement on which state of the specimen, fresh or fixed, should be used for final tumor measurement. To determine the influence of fixation and processing on breast tumor size, a specific 1-dimensional measurement from 50 invasive breast tumors was recorded in fresh, fixed, and processed/mounted states. Tumors varied in maximum measured dimension from 4 to 20 mm and contained 10{\%} to 90{\%} estimated fibrous tissue (mean, 52.8{\%}). In 96{\%} of cases, there was no difference in measured size between fresh and fixed states. After final processing and mounting, a decrease in size from initial fresh measurement was noted in 40{\%} of cases (mean difference, 2.4 mm; maximum difference, 7 mm). In 9 cases (18{\%}), the measured size increased by a maximum of 3 mm (mean, 1.7 mm) after processing/mounting. Twenty-one cases (42{\%}) showed no change in measurement during the entire fixation and processing protocol. Increases in measured size were attributed largely to tissue expansion during histological sectioning/mounting. One can arguably measure the size of an invasive breast cancer from either the fresh or fixed state without affecting accuracy, but caution should be exercised in relying solely on the microscopic measurements.",
keywords = "Breast, Cancer, Fixation, Formalin, Measurement",
author = "Bobbi Pritt and Tessitore, {Joseph J.} and Weaver, {Donald L.} and Hagen Blaszyk",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.humpath.2005.04.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "756--760",
journal = "Human Pathology",
issn = "0046-8177",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of tissue fixation and processing on breast cancer size

AU - Pritt, Bobbi

AU - Tessitore, Joseph J.

AU - Weaver, Donald L.

AU - Blaszyk, Hagen

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Precise measurement of an invasive breast cancer is crucial for pathological staging and subsequent patient management. Formalin fixation and histological processing may change tissue size, but there is no agreement on which state of the specimen, fresh or fixed, should be used for final tumor measurement. To determine the influence of fixation and processing on breast tumor size, a specific 1-dimensional measurement from 50 invasive breast tumors was recorded in fresh, fixed, and processed/mounted states. Tumors varied in maximum measured dimension from 4 to 20 mm and contained 10% to 90% estimated fibrous tissue (mean, 52.8%). In 96% of cases, there was no difference in measured size between fresh and fixed states. After final processing and mounting, a decrease in size from initial fresh measurement was noted in 40% of cases (mean difference, 2.4 mm; maximum difference, 7 mm). In 9 cases (18%), the measured size increased by a maximum of 3 mm (mean, 1.7 mm) after processing/mounting. Twenty-one cases (42%) showed no change in measurement during the entire fixation and processing protocol. Increases in measured size were attributed largely to tissue expansion during histological sectioning/mounting. One can arguably measure the size of an invasive breast cancer from either the fresh or fixed state without affecting accuracy, but caution should be exercised in relying solely on the microscopic measurements.

AB - Precise measurement of an invasive breast cancer is crucial for pathological staging and subsequent patient management. Formalin fixation and histological processing may change tissue size, but there is no agreement on which state of the specimen, fresh or fixed, should be used for final tumor measurement. To determine the influence of fixation and processing on breast tumor size, a specific 1-dimensional measurement from 50 invasive breast tumors was recorded in fresh, fixed, and processed/mounted states. Tumors varied in maximum measured dimension from 4 to 20 mm and contained 10% to 90% estimated fibrous tissue (mean, 52.8%). In 96% of cases, there was no difference in measured size between fresh and fixed states. After final processing and mounting, a decrease in size from initial fresh measurement was noted in 40% of cases (mean difference, 2.4 mm; maximum difference, 7 mm). In 9 cases (18%), the measured size increased by a maximum of 3 mm (mean, 1.7 mm) after processing/mounting. Twenty-one cases (42%) showed no change in measurement during the entire fixation and processing protocol. Increases in measured size were attributed largely to tissue expansion during histological sectioning/mounting. One can arguably measure the size of an invasive breast cancer from either the fresh or fixed state without affecting accuracy, but caution should be exercised in relying solely on the microscopic measurements.

KW - Breast

KW - Cancer

KW - Fixation

KW - Formalin

KW - Measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23444431971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23444431971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.04.018

DO - 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.04.018

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 756

EP - 760

JO - Human Pathology

JF - Human Pathology

SN - 0046-8177

IS - 7

ER -