The effect of helical computed tomography on diagnostic and treatment strategies in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism

Robert L. Trowbridge, Philip A Araoz, Michael Gotway, Richard A. Bailey, Andrew D. Auerbach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Helical computed tomography (CT) has been proposed as a first-line test for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. How the test affects the diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism is unknown. Methods: We examined a cohort of 360 patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism at a teaching hospital in the 4 years following the introduction of the helical CT scan. We collected patient demographic and clinical data to calculate the pretest likelihood of pulmonary embolism; we then read the test results and determined rates of further testing and treatment for pulmonary embolism. Results: After the helical CT scan became available, the number of patients referred for pulmonary embolism testing increased markedly from 170 to 624 total evaluations during 1997 to 2000 (P <0.01). This rise was due to increased use of the helical CT scan (9% to 83% of evaluations, P <0.01) as the use of ventilation-perfusion scanning (79% to 17%, P = 0.03) and pulmonary angiography (12% to <1%, P <0.01) fell. There was no change in the pre-test likelihood of disease over time, but the percentage of scans that were positive for pulmonary embolism rose (14% to 32%, P =0.02). Clinicians treated all patients who had a positive CT scan, but became less likely over time to order further testing for patients who had a negative scan (30% to 12%, P = 0.02). Conclusion: At this academic medical center, introduction of the helical CT scan had a profound effect on the evaluation of pulmonary embolism, resulting in more frequent use of the CT scan, and more frequent diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism, despite no change in the pretest probability of disease. Future studies should confirm our findings and determine whether increased detection of pulmonary emboli results in improved outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-90
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Medicine
Volume116
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spiral Computed Tomography
Pulmonary Embolism
Therapeutics
Tomography
Lung
Embolism
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Teaching Hospitals
Ventilation
Angiography
Perfusion
Demography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

The effect of helical computed tomography on diagnostic and treatment strategies in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. / Trowbridge, Robert L.; Araoz, Philip A; Gotway, Michael; Bailey, Richard A.; Auerbach, Andrew D.

In: American Journal of Medicine, Vol. 116, No. 2, 15.01.2004, p. 84-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b5437ba593a4b9d8f549536f6d24ffb,
title = "The effect of helical computed tomography on diagnostic and treatment strategies in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism",
abstract = "Background: Helical computed tomography (CT) has been proposed as a first-line test for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. How the test affects the diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism is unknown. Methods: We examined a cohort of 360 patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism at a teaching hospital in the 4 years following the introduction of the helical CT scan. We collected patient demographic and clinical data to calculate the pretest likelihood of pulmonary embolism; we then read the test results and determined rates of further testing and treatment for pulmonary embolism. Results: After the helical CT scan became available, the number of patients referred for pulmonary embolism testing increased markedly from 170 to 624 total evaluations during 1997 to 2000 (P <0.01). This rise was due to increased use of the helical CT scan (9{\%} to 83{\%} of evaluations, P <0.01) as the use of ventilation-perfusion scanning (79{\%} to 17{\%}, P = 0.03) and pulmonary angiography (12{\%} to <1{\%}, P <0.01) fell. There was no change in the pre-test likelihood of disease over time, but the percentage of scans that were positive for pulmonary embolism rose (14{\%} to 32{\%}, P =0.02). Clinicians treated all patients who had a positive CT scan, but became less likely over time to order further testing for patients who had a negative scan (30{\%} to 12{\%}, P = 0.02). Conclusion: At this academic medical center, introduction of the helical CT scan had a profound effect on the evaluation of pulmonary embolism, resulting in more frequent use of the CT scan, and more frequent diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism, despite no change in the pretest probability of disease. Future studies should confirm our findings and determine whether increased detection of pulmonary emboli results in improved outcomes.",
author = "Trowbridge, {Robert L.} and Araoz, {Philip A} and Michael Gotway and Bailey, {Richard A.} and Auerbach, {Andrew D.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.07.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "84--90",
journal = "American Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0002-9343",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of helical computed tomography on diagnostic and treatment strategies in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism

AU - Trowbridge, Robert L.

AU - Araoz, Philip A

AU - Gotway, Michael

AU - Bailey, Richard A.

AU - Auerbach, Andrew D.

PY - 2004/1/15

Y1 - 2004/1/15

N2 - Background: Helical computed tomography (CT) has been proposed as a first-line test for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. How the test affects the diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism is unknown. Methods: We examined a cohort of 360 patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism at a teaching hospital in the 4 years following the introduction of the helical CT scan. We collected patient demographic and clinical data to calculate the pretest likelihood of pulmonary embolism; we then read the test results and determined rates of further testing and treatment for pulmonary embolism. Results: After the helical CT scan became available, the number of patients referred for pulmonary embolism testing increased markedly from 170 to 624 total evaluations during 1997 to 2000 (P <0.01). This rise was due to increased use of the helical CT scan (9% to 83% of evaluations, P <0.01) as the use of ventilation-perfusion scanning (79% to 17%, P = 0.03) and pulmonary angiography (12% to <1%, P <0.01) fell. There was no change in the pre-test likelihood of disease over time, but the percentage of scans that were positive for pulmonary embolism rose (14% to 32%, P =0.02). Clinicians treated all patients who had a positive CT scan, but became less likely over time to order further testing for patients who had a negative scan (30% to 12%, P = 0.02). Conclusion: At this academic medical center, introduction of the helical CT scan had a profound effect on the evaluation of pulmonary embolism, resulting in more frequent use of the CT scan, and more frequent diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism, despite no change in the pretest probability of disease. Future studies should confirm our findings and determine whether increased detection of pulmonary emboli results in improved outcomes.

AB - Background: Helical computed tomography (CT) has been proposed as a first-line test for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. How the test affects the diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism is unknown. Methods: We examined a cohort of 360 patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism at a teaching hospital in the 4 years following the introduction of the helical CT scan. We collected patient demographic and clinical data to calculate the pretest likelihood of pulmonary embolism; we then read the test results and determined rates of further testing and treatment for pulmonary embolism. Results: After the helical CT scan became available, the number of patients referred for pulmonary embolism testing increased markedly from 170 to 624 total evaluations during 1997 to 2000 (P <0.01). This rise was due to increased use of the helical CT scan (9% to 83% of evaluations, P <0.01) as the use of ventilation-perfusion scanning (79% to 17%, P = 0.03) and pulmonary angiography (12% to <1%, P <0.01) fell. There was no change in the pre-test likelihood of disease over time, but the percentage of scans that were positive for pulmonary embolism rose (14% to 32%, P =0.02). Clinicians treated all patients who had a positive CT scan, but became less likely over time to order further testing for patients who had a negative scan (30% to 12%, P = 0.02). Conclusion: At this academic medical center, introduction of the helical CT scan had a profound effect on the evaluation of pulmonary embolism, resulting in more frequent use of the CT scan, and more frequent diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism, despite no change in the pretest probability of disease. Future studies should confirm our findings and determine whether increased detection of pulmonary emboli results in improved outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346724758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346724758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.07.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 14715321

AN - SCOPUS:0346724758

VL - 116

SP - 84

EP - 90

JO - American Journal of Medicine

JF - American Journal of Medicine

SN - 0002-9343

IS - 2

ER -