The early healing of tibial osteotomies stabilized by one-plane or two-plane external fixation

E. A. Williams, J. A. Rand, K. N. An, E. Y. Chao, P. J. Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The pattern of early healing of canine tibial osteotomies associated with two different types of external fixation devices was investigated. Two-plane fixation was significantly more rigid than one-plane fixation in three of the five loading conditions that were examined. The more rigid fixation allowed less lateral displacement at the site of the osteotomy, induced less formation of callus early in the healing process, permitted direct bridging by osteons more frequently, and provided healing that was more rigid early in the process of repair. In the later stages of healing there were no differences in the quantity of callus or in the strength of the healing bone. In this canine model, external fixation with higher rigidity resulted in rapid union that differed from the union that resulted after less rigid external fixation only with regard to porosity, torsional stiffness, and displacement at the site of the fracture. Clinical Relevance: The biological pathway to osseous union can be influenced by the rigidity of the fixation. Controversy has existed regarding the need for two-plane external fixation of higher or lower rigidity. In the present investigation, union of the fracture was achieved with both modes of treatment. Although higher-rigidity external fixation resulted in less callus and a stiffer repair of the osteotomy early in the process of healing, the later stages of healing and strength were similar. Therefore, clinical factors such as soft-tissue injuries may be a more important consideration in the selection of the configuration of the external fixator than are its characteristics with regard to mechanical rigidity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)355-365
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A
Volume69
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1987

Fingerprint

Bony Callus
Osteotomy
External Fixators
Canidae
Haversian System
Soft Tissue Injuries
Porosity
Bone and Bones
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Williams, E. A., Rand, J. A., An, K. N., Chao, E. Y., & Kelly, P. J. (1987). The early healing of tibial osteotomies stabilized by one-plane or two-plane external fixation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, 69(3), 355-365.

The early healing of tibial osteotomies stabilized by one-plane or two-plane external fixation. / Williams, E. A.; Rand, J. A.; An, K. N.; Chao, E. Y.; Kelly, P. J.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, Vol. 69, No. 3, 1987, p. 355-365.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Williams, EA, Rand, JA, An, KN, Chao, EY & Kelly, PJ 1987, 'The early healing of tibial osteotomies stabilized by one-plane or two-plane external fixation', Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 355-365.
Williams, E. A. ; Rand, J. A. ; An, K. N. ; Chao, E. Y. ; Kelly, P. J. / The early healing of tibial osteotomies stabilized by one-plane or two-plane external fixation. In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A. 1987 ; Vol. 69, No. 3. pp. 355-365.
@article{7a37062da0b34194bda1943fb2b58fff,
title = "The early healing of tibial osteotomies stabilized by one-plane or two-plane external fixation",
abstract = "The pattern of early healing of canine tibial osteotomies associated with two different types of external fixation devices was investigated. Two-plane fixation was significantly more rigid than one-plane fixation in three of the five loading conditions that were examined. The more rigid fixation allowed less lateral displacement at the site of the osteotomy, induced less formation of callus early in the healing process, permitted direct bridging by osteons more frequently, and provided healing that was more rigid early in the process of repair. In the later stages of healing there were no differences in the quantity of callus or in the strength of the healing bone. In this canine model, external fixation with higher rigidity resulted in rapid union that differed from the union that resulted after less rigid external fixation only with regard to porosity, torsional stiffness, and displacement at the site of the fracture. Clinical Relevance: The biological pathway to osseous union can be influenced by the rigidity of the fixation. Controversy has existed regarding the need for two-plane external fixation of higher or lower rigidity. In the present investigation, union of the fracture was achieved with both modes of treatment. Although higher-rigidity external fixation resulted in less callus and a stiffer repair of the osteotomy early in the process of healing, the later stages of healing and strength were similar. Therefore, clinical factors such as soft-tissue injuries may be a more important consideration in the selection of the configuration of the external fixator than are its characteristics with regard to mechanical rigidity.",
author = "Williams, {E. A.} and Rand, {J. A.} and An, {K. N.} and Chao, {E. Y.} and Kelly, {P. J.}",
year = "1987",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "355--365",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The early healing of tibial osteotomies stabilized by one-plane or two-plane external fixation

AU - Williams, E. A.

AU - Rand, J. A.

AU - An, K. N.

AU - Chao, E. Y.

AU - Kelly, P. J.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - The pattern of early healing of canine tibial osteotomies associated with two different types of external fixation devices was investigated. Two-plane fixation was significantly more rigid than one-plane fixation in three of the five loading conditions that were examined. The more rigid fixation allowed less lateral displacement at the site of the osteotomy, induced less formation of callus early in the healing process, permitted direct bridging by osteons more frequently, and provided healing that was more rigid early in the process of repair. In the later stages of healing there were no differences in the quantity of callus or in the strength of the healing bone. In this canine model, external fixation with higher rigidity resulted in rapid union that differed from the union that resulted after less rigid external fixation only with regard to porosity, torsional stiffness, and displacement at the site of the fracture. Clinical Relevance: The biological pathway to osseous union can be influenced by the rigidity of the fixation. Controversy has existed regarding the need for two-plane external fixation of higher or lower rigidity. In the present investigation, union of the fracture was achieved with both modes of treatment. Although higher-rigidity external fixation resulted in less callus and a stiffer repair of the osteotomy early in the process of healing, the later stages of healing and strength were similar. Therefore, clinical factors such as soft-tissue injuries may be a more important consideration in the selection of the configuration of the external fixator than are its characteristics with regard to mechanical rigidity.

AB - The pattern of early healing of canine tibial osteotomies associated with two different types of external fixation devices was investigated. Two-plane fixation was significantly more rigid than one-plane fixation in three of the five loading conditions that were examined. The more rigid fixation allowed less lateral displacement at the site of the osteotomy, induced less formation of callus early in the healing process, permitted direct bridging by osteons more frequently, and provided healing that was more rigid early in the process of repair. In the later stages of healing there were no differences in the quantity of callus or in the strength of the healing bone. In this canine model, external fixation with higher rigidity resulted in rapid union that differed from the union that resulted after less rigid external fixation only with regard to porosity, torsional stiffness, and displacement at the site of the fracture. Clinical Relevance: The biological pathway to osseous union can be influenced by the rigidity of the fixation. Controversy has existed regarding the need for two-plane external fixation of higher or lower rigidity. In the present investigation, union of the fracture was achieved with both modes of treatment. Although higher-rigidity external fixation resulted in less callus and a stiffer repair of the osteotomy early in the process of healing, the later stages of healing and strength were similar. Therefore, clinical factors such as soft-tissue injuries may be a more important consideration in the selection of the configuration of the external fixator than are its characteristics with regard to mechanical rigidity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023218447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023218447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3818701

AN - SCOPUS:0023218447

VL - 69

SP - 355

EP - 365

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

SN - 0021-9355

IS - 3

ER -