The diagnostic yield of the first episode of a periodic health evaluation: A descriptive epidemiology study

Cindy A. Kermott, Carol S. Kuhle, Stephanie S. Faubion, Ruth E. Johnson, Donald D. Hensrud, Mohammad H Murad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The benefits of a periodic health evaluation remain debatable. The incremental value added by such evaluations beyond the delivery of age appropriate screening and preventive medicine recommendations is unclear. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on a cohort of consecutive patients presenting for their first episode of a comprehensive periodic health evaluation. We abstracted data on new diagnoses that were identified during this single episode of care and that were not trivial (i.e., required additional testing or intervention). Results: The cohort consisted of 491 patients. The rate of new diagnoses per this single episode of care was 0.9 diagnoses per patient. The majority of these diagnoses was not prompted by patients complaints (71%) and would not have been identified by screening guidelines (51%). Men (odds ratio 2.67; 95% CI, 1.76, 4.03) and those with multiple complaints at presentation (odds ratio 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05, 1.19) were more likely to receive a clinically relevant diagnosis at the conclusion of the visit. Age was not a predictor of receiving a diagnosis in this cohort. Conclusion: The first episode of a comprehensive periodic health evaluation may reveal numerous important diagnoses or risk factors that are not always identified through routine screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number137
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Epidemiology
Health
Episode of Care
Odds Ratio
Preventive Medicine
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Annual examination
  • Diagnostic yield
  • Periodic health evaluation
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

The diagnostic yield of the first episode of a periodic health evaluation : A descriptive epidemiology study. / Kermott, Cindy A.; Kuhle, Carol S.; Faubion, Stephanie S.; Johnson, Ruth E.; Hensrud, Donald D.; Murad, Mohammad H.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, 137, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kermott, Cindy A. ; Kuhle, Carol S. ; Faubion, Stephanie S. ; Johnson, Ruth E. ; Hensrud, Donald D. ; Murad, Mohammad H. / The diagnostic yield of the first episode of a periodic health evaluation : A descriptive epidemiology study. In: BMC Health Services Research. 2012 ; Vol. 12, No. 1.
@article{e4218fb7001a440fbf8cda0541042f81,
title = "The diagnostic yield of the first episode of a periodic health evaluation: A descriptive epidemiology study",
abstract = "Background: The benefits of a periodic health evaluation remain debatable. The incremental value added by such evaluations beyond the delivery of age appropriate screening and preventive medicine recommendations is unclear. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on a cohort of consecutive patients presenting for their first episode of a comprehensive periodic health evaluation. We abstracted data on new diagnoses that were identified during this single episode of care and that were not trivial (i.e., required additional testing or intervention). Results: The cohort consisted of 491 patients. The rate of new diagnoses per this single episode of care was 0.9 diagnoses per patient. The majority of these diagnoses was not prompted by patients complaints (71{\%}) and would not have been identified by screening guidelines (51{\%}). Men (odds ratio 2.67; 95{\%} CI, 1.76, 4.03) and those with multiple complaints at presentation (odds ratio 1.12; 95{\%} CI, 1.05, 1.19) were more likely to receive a clinically relevant diagnosis at the conclusion of the visit. Age was not a predictor of receiving a diagnosis in this cohort. Conclusion: The first episode of a comprehensive periodic health evaluation may reveal numerous important diagnoses or risk factors that are not always identified through routine screening.",
keywords = "Annual examination, Diagnostic yield, Periodic health evaluation, Screening",
author = "Kermott, {Cindy A.} and Kuhle, {Carol S.} and Faubion, {Stephanie S.} and Johnson, {Ruth E.} and Hensrud, {Donald D.} and Murad, {Mohammad H}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6963-12-137",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The diagnostic yield of the first episode of a periodic health evaluation

T2 - A descriptive epidemiology study

AU - Kermott, Cindy A.

AU - Kuhle, Carol S.

AU - Faubion, Stephanie S.

AU - Johnson, Ruth E.

AU - Hensrud, Donald D.

AU - Murad, Mohammad H

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Background: The benefits of a periodic health evaluation remain debatable. The incremental value added by such evaluations beyond the delivery of age appropriate screening and preventive medicine recommendations is unclear. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on a cohort of consecutive patients presenting for their first episode of a comprehensive periodic health evaluation. We abstracted data on new diagnoses that were identified during this single episode of care and that were not trivial (i.e., required additional testing or intervention). Results: The cohort consisted of 491 patients. The rate of new diagnoses per this single episode of care was 0.9 diagnoses per patient. The majority of these diagnoses was not prompted by patients complaints (71%) and would not have been identified by screening guidelines (51%). Men (odds ratio 2.67; 95% CI, 1.76, 4.03) and those with multiple complaints at presentation (odds ratio 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05, 1.19) were more likely to receive a clinically relevant diagnosis at the conclusion of the visit. Age was not a predictor of receiving a diagnosis in this cohort. Conclusion: The first episode of a comprehensive periodic health evaluation may reveal numerous important diagnoses or risk factors that are not always identified through routine screening.

AB - Background: The benefits of a periodic health evaluation remain debatable. The incremental value added by such evaluations beyond the delivery of age appropriate screening and preventive medicine recommendations is unclear. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on a cohort of consecutive patients presenting for their first episode of a comprehensive periodic health evaluation. We abstracted data on new diagnoses that were identified during this single episode of care and that were not trivial (i.e., required additional testing or intervention). Results: The cohort consisted of 491 patients. The rate of new diagnoses per this single episode of care was 0.9 diagnoses per patient. The majority of these diagnoses was not prompted by patients complaints (71%) and would not have been identified by screening guidelines (51%). Men (odds ratio 2.67; 95% CI, 1.76, 4.03) and those with multiple complaints at presentation (odds ratio 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05, 1.19) were more likely to receive a clinically relevant diagnosis at the conclusion of the visit. Age was not a predictor of receiving a diagnosis in this cohort. Conclusion: The first episode of a comprehensive periodic health evaluation may reveal numerous important diagnoses or risk factors that are not always identified through routine screening.

KW - Annual examination

KW - Diagnostic yield

KW - Periodic health evaluation

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861548447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861548447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6963-12-137

DO - 10.1186/1472-6963-12-137

M3 - Article

C2 - 22646664

AN - SCOPUS:84861548447

VL - 12

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

IS - 1

M1 - 137

ER -