Thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: Recommendations for long-term outcome analysis

J. D. Putzke, R. E. Wharen, A. A. Obwegeser, Zbigniew K Wszolek, John A Lucas, M. F. Turk, Ryan J. Uitti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Determine the efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for tremor control among individuals with essential tremor (ET). Methods: A clinical series of 52 consecutive individuals undergoing placement of a DBS system for treatment of ET completed an unblinded battery of subjective and objective measures at postoperative intervals of one, three, and 12 months, and annually thereafter up to three years. The assessment battery included measures of tremor and activities of daily living. Results: Both subjective and objective measures showed that stimulation was associated with significant improvement at nearly every postoperative interval as compared to pre-operative and stimulation 'off' ratings of activities of daily living functioning, midline tremor, contralateral upper extremity tremor, and contralateral lower extremity tremor. Ipsilateral tremor showed some improvement with stimulation, but only within the first three months. Trend analysis showed stable tremor control. Stimulation settings remained largely unchanged after the first three months. Dysarthria was more common among those with bilateral stimulation. A range of missing data estimation methods were performed, and subsequent analyses corroborated the main findings of the study. Conclusion: Thalamic DBS is generally a well-tolerated and effective treatment for ET. Methodological and analytical recommendations are provided for the evaluation of long-term outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-342
Number of pages10
JournalCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences
Volume31
Issue number3
StatePublished - Aug 2004

Fingerprint

Essential Tremor
Deep Brain Stimulation
Tremor
Activities of Daily Living
Dysarthria
Upper Extremity
Lower Extremity
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor : Recommendations for long-term outcome analysis. / Putzke, J. D.; Wharen, R. E.; Obwegeser, A. A.; Wszolek, Zbigniew K; Lucas, John A; Turk, M. F.; Uitti, Ryan J.

In: Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, Vol. 31, No. 3, 08.2004, p. 333-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Putzke, J. D. ; Wharen, R. E. ; Obwegeser, A. A. ; Wszolek, Zbigniew K ; Lucas, John A ; Turk, M. F. ; Uitti, Ryan J. / Thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor : Recommendations for long-term outcome analysis. In: Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. 2004 ; Vol. 31, No. 3. pp. 333-342.
@article{4e98b51ea38b4e6f9be197608a4478f4,
title = "Thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: Recommendations for long-term outcome analysis",
abstract = "Objectives: Determine the efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for tremor control among individuals with essential tremor (ET). Methods: A clinical series of 52 consecutive individuals undergoing placement of a DBS system for treatment of ET completed an unblinded battery of subjective and objective measures at postoperative intervals of one, three, and 12 months, and annually thereafter up to three years. The assessment battery included measures of tremor and activities of daily living. Results: Both subjective and objective measures showed that stimulation was associated with significant improvement at nearly every postoperative interval as compared to pre-operative and stimulation 'off' ratings of activities of daily living functioning, midline tremor, contralateral upper extremity tremor, and contralateral lower extremity tremor. Ipsilateral tremor showed some improvement with stimulation, but only within the first three months. Trend analysis showed stable tremor control. Stimulation settings remained largely unchanged after the first three months. Dysarthria was more common among those with bilateral stimulation. A range of missing data estimation methods were performed, and subsequent analyses corroborated the main findings of the study. Conclusion: Thalamic DBS is generally a well-tolerated and effective treatment for ET. Methodological and analytical recommendations are provided for the evaluation of long-term outcome.",
author = "Putzke, {J. D.} and Wharen, {R. E.} and Obwegeser, {A. A.} and Wszolek, {Zbigniew K} and Lucas, {John A} and Turk, {M. F.} and Uitti, {Ryan J.}",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "333--342",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences",
issn = "0317-1671",
publisher = "Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor

T2 - Recommendations for long-term outcome analysis

AU - Putzke, J. D.

AU - Wharen, R. E.

AU - Obwegeser, A. A.

AU - Wszolek, Zbigniew K

AU - Lucas, John A

AU - Turk, M. F.

AU - Uitti, Ryan J.

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - Objectives: Determine the efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for tremor control among individuals with essential tremor (ET). Methods: A clinical series of 52 consecutive individuals undergoing placement of a DBS system for treatment of ET completed an unblinded battery of subjective and objective measures at postoperative intervals of one, three, and 12 months, and annually thereafter up to three years. The assessment battery included measures of tremor and activities of daily living. Results: Both subjective and objective measures showed that stimulation was associated with significant improvement at nearly every postoperative interval as compared to pre-operative and stimulation 'off' ratings of activities of daily living functioning, midline tremor, contralateral upper extremity tremor, and contralateral lower extremity tremor. Ipsilateral tremor showed some improvement with stimulation, but only within the first three months. Trend analysis showed stable tremor control. Stimulation settings remained largely unchanged after the first three months. Dysarthria was more common among those with bilateral stimulation. A range of missing data estimation methods were performed, and subsequent analyses corroborated the main findings of the study. Conclusion: Thalamic DBS is generally a well-tolerated and effective treatment for ET. Methodological and analytical recommendations are provided for the evaluation of long-term outcome.

AB - Objectives: Determine the efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for tremor control among individuals with essential tremor (ET). Methods: A clinical series of 52 consecutive individuals undergoing placement of a DBS system for treatment of ET completed an unblinded battery of subjective and objective measures at postoperative intervals of one, three, and 12 months, and annually thereafter up to three years. The assessment battery included measures of tremor and activities of daily living. Results: Both subjective and objective measures showed that stimulation was associated with significant improvement at nearly every postoperative interval as compared to pre-operative and stimulation 'off' ratings of activities of daily living functioning, midline tremor, contralateral upper extremity tremor, and contralateral lower extremity tremor. Ipsilateral tremor showed some improvement with stimulation, but only within the first three months. Trend analysis showed stable tremor control. Stimulation settings remained largely unchanged after the first three months. Dysarthria was more common among those with bilateral stimulation. A range of missing data estimation methods were performed, and subsequent analyses corroborated the main findings of the study. Conclusion: Thalamic DBS is generally a well-tolerated and effective treatment for ET. Methodological and analytical recommendations are provided for the evaluation of long-term outcome.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4644229797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4644229797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15376477

AN - SCOPUS:4644229797

VL - 31

SP - 333

EP - 342

JO - Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences

JF - Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences

SN - 0317-1671

IS - 3

ER -