Surgeon Workload in Colorectal Surgery: Perceived Drivers of Procedural Difficulty

Katherine E. Law, Bethany R. Lowndes, Scott R. Kelley, Renaldo C. Blocker, David W. Larson, M. Susan Hallbeck, H. Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: To understand how surgeon expectation of case difficulty relates to workload for colon and rectal procedures and to identify possible surgeon-perceived drivers contributing to case difficulty. Materials and methods: For 3 mo, surgeons were asked to complete a modified NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire following each surgical case. Questions included items on distractions, fatigue, procedural difficulty, and expectation plus the validated NASA-TLX items. All but expectation were rated on a 20-point scale (0 = low, 20 = high). Expectation was rated on a 3-point scale (i.e., more difficult than expected, as expected, less difficult than expected). Surgeons also reported perceived drivers contributing to case ease or difficulty. Patient and procedural data were analyzed for procedures with completed surveys. Results: Seven surgeons (three female) rated 122 procedures over the research period using a modified NASA-TLX survey. Mean surgeon-perceived workload was highest for effort (mean [M] = 10.83, standard deviation [SD] = 5.66) followed by mental demand (M = 10.18, SD = 5.17), and physical demand (M = 9.19, SD = 5.60). Procedural difficulty varied significantly by procedure type (P < 0.001). Thirty-five percent of cases were considered more difficult than expected. Surgeon-perceived workload and most subscales differed significantly according to expectation level. There was no significant difference in patient factors by expectation level. Surgeons most frequently reported patient anatomy, body habitus, and operative team characteristics as drivers to difficulty and ease of cases. Conclusions: Procedural difficulty significantly differed across procedure type. More than one-third of cases were more difficult than expected, during which surgeons attributed this to operative team characteristics as well as issues in patient anatomy and body habitus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-63
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume245
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

Fingerprint

Colorectal Surgery
Workload
United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Anatomy
Surgeons
Fatigue
Colon

Keywords

  • Cognitive demand
  • Colorectal surgery
  • Expectation
  • Human factors
  • Physical demand
  • Workload

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Surgeon Workload in Colorectal Surgery : Perceived Drivers of Procedural Difficulty. / Law, Katherine E.; Lowndes, Bethany R.; Kelley, Scott R.; Blocker, Renaldo C.; Larson, David W.; Hallbeck, M. Susan; Nelson, H.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 245, 01.01.2020, p. 57-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ef377c4bab7441b889b555171c3b5958,
title = "Surgeon Workload in Colorectal Surgery: Perceived Drivers of Procedural Difficulty",
abstract = "Background: To understand how surgeon expectation of case difficulty relates to workload for colon and rectal procedures and to identify possible surgeon-perceived drivers contributing to case difficulty. Materials and methods: For 3 mo, surgeons were asked to complete a modified NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire following each surgical case. Questions included items on distractions, fatigue, procedural difficulty, and expectation plus the validated NASA-TLX items. All but expectation were rated on a 20-point scale (0 = low, 20 = high). Expectation was rated on a 3-point scale (i.e., more difficult than expected, as expected, less difficult than expected). Surgeons also reported perceived drivers contributing to case ease or difficulty. Patient and procedural data were analyzed for procedures with completed surveys. Results: Seven surgeons (three female) rated 122 procedures over the research period using a modified NASA-TLX survey. Mean surgeon-perceived workload was highest for effort (mean [M] = 10.83, standard deviation [SD] = 5.66) followed by mental demand (M = 10.18, SD = 5.17), and physical demand (M = 9.19, SD = 5.60). Procedural difficulty varied significantly by procedure type (P < 0.001). Thirty-five percent of cases were considered more difficult than expected. Surgeon-perceived workload and most subscales differed significantly according to expectation level. There was no significant difference in patient factors by expectation level. Surgeons most frequently reported patient anatomy, body habitus, and operative team characteristics as drivers to difficulty and ease of cases. Conclusions: Procedural difficulty significantly differed across procedure type. More than one-third of cases were more difficult than expected, during which surgeons attributed this to operative team characteristics as well as issues in patient anatomy and body habitus.",
keywords = "Cognitive demand, Colorectal surgery, Expectation, Human factors, Physical demand, Workload",
author = "Law, {Katherine E.} and Lowndes, {Bethany R.} and Kelley, {Scott R.} and Blocker, {Renaldo C.} and Larson, {David W.} and Hallbeck, {M. Susan} and H. Nelson",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.084",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "245",
pages = "57--63",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgeon Workload in Colorectal Surgery

T2 - Perceived Drivers of Procedural Difficulty

AU - Law, Katherine E.

AU - Lowndes, Bethany R.

AU - Kelley, Scott R.

AU - Blocker, Renaldo C.

AU - Larson, David W.

AU - Hallbeck, M. Susan

AU - Nelson, H.

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - Background: To understand how surgeon expectation of case difficulty relates to workload for colon and rectal procedures and to identify possible surgeon-perceived drivers contributing to case difficulty. Materials and methods: For 3 mo, surgeons were asked to complete a modified NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire following each surgical case. Questions included items on distractions, fatigue, procedural difficulty, and expectation plus the validated NASA-TLX items. All but expectation were rated on a 20-point scale (0 = low, 20 = high). Expectation was rated on a 3-point scale (i.e., more difficult than expected, as expected, less difficult than expected). Surgeons also reported perceived drivers contributing to case ease or difficulty. Patient and procedural data were analyzed for procedures with completed surveys. Results: Seven surgeons (three female) rated 122 procedures over the research period using a modified NASA-TLX survey. Mean surgeon-perceived workload was highest for effort (mean [M] = 10.83, standard deviation [SD] = 5.66) followed by mental demand (M = 10.18, SD = 5.17), and physical demand (M = 9.19, SD = 5.60). Procedural difficulty varied significantly by procedure type (P < 0.001). Thirty-five percent of cases were considered more difficult than expected. Surgeon-perceived workload and most subscales differed significantly according to expectation level. There was no significant difference in patient factors by expectation level. Surgeons most frequently reported patient anatomy, body habitus, and operative team characteristics as drivers to difficulty and ease of cases. Conclusions: Procedural difficulty significantly differed across procedure type. More than one-third of cases were more difficult than expected, during which surgeons attributed this to operative team characteristics as well as issues in patient anatomy and body habitus.

AB - Background: To understand how surgeon expectation of case difficulty relates to workload for colon and rectal procedures and to identify possible surgeon-perceived drivers contributing to case difficulty. Materials and methods: For 3 mo, surgeons were asked to complete a modified NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire following each surgical case. Questions included items on distractions, fatigue, procedural difficulty, and expectation plus the validated NASA-TLX items. All but expectation were rated on a 20-point scale (0 = low, 20 = high). Expectation was rated on a 3-point scale (i.e., more difficult than expected, as expected, less difficult than expected). Surgeons also reported perceived drivers contributing to case ease or difficulty. Patient and procedural data were analyzed for procedures with completed surveys. Results: Seven surgeons (three female) rated 122 procedures over the research period using a modified NASA-TLX survey. Mean surgeon-perceived workload was highest for effort (mean [M] = 10.83, standard deviation [SD] = 5.66) followed by mental demand (M = 10.18, SD = 5.17), and physical demand (M = 9.19, SD = 5.60). Procedural difficulty varied significantly by procedure type (P < 0.001). Thirty-five percent of cases were considered more difficult than expected. Surgeon-perceived workload and most subscales differed significantly according to expectation level. There was no significant difference in patient factors by expectation level. Surgeons most frequently reported patient anatomy, body habitus, and operative team characteristics as drivers to difficulty and ease of cases. Conclusions: Procedural difficulty significantly differed across procedure type. More than one-third of cases were more difficult than expected, during which surgeons attributed this to operative team characteristics as well as issues in patient anatomy and body habitus.

KW - Cognitive demand

KW - Colorectal surgery

KW - Expectation

KW - Human factors

KW - Physical demand

KW - Workload

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070199449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070199449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.084

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.084

M3 - Article

C2 - 31401248

AN - SCOPUS:85070199449

VL - 245

SP - 57

EP - 63

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

ER -