Succinct Cancer Clinical Trial Consent Forms in Rural Patients With Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blinded study

Jana Wieland; Daniel Satele; Yahya Almodallal; Paul Novotny; Stephanie L. Pritzl; Sumithra J. Mandrekar; Aminah Jatoi

doi:10.1177/23743735221107242

Succinct Cancer Clinical Trial Consent Forms in Rural Patients With Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blinded study

Jana Wieland, Daniel Satele, Yahya Almodallal, Paul Novotny, Stephanie L. Pritzl, Sumithra J. Mandrekar, Aminah Jatoi

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Rural patients are often underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. This is a secondary analysis of a study that tested short (2000 word) versus long (6000 word) consent forms with a focus on rurality. Among 240 patients, 89 (37%) were rural. Seventy-one (80%) rural and 117 (77%) nonrural patients signed a consent form of any length (P =.68). Forty-one of 47 (87%) rural patients signed a short consent form; in contrast, 30 of 42 (71%) signed a long form. These trends suggest rural patients are more likely to sign short consent forms. Further study is indicated.

Original language	English (US)
Journal	Journal of Patient Experience
Volume	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735221107242
State	Published - 2022

Keywords

brevity
clinical trials
educational
short consent forms
succinct

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Health Policy
Leadership and Management
Health(social science)

Access to Document

10.1177/23743735221107242

Cite this

@article{d48d12baaf464e968a7aaf85ccbfc06b,

title = "Succinct Cancer Clinical Trial Consent Forms in Rural Patients With Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blinded study",

abstract = "Rural patients are often underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. This is a secondary analysis of a study that tested short (2000 word) versus long (6000 word) consent forms with a focus on rurality. Among 240 patients, 89 (37%) were rural. Seventy-one (80%) rural and 117 (77%) nonrural patients signed a consent form of any length (P =.68). Forty-one of 47 (87%) rural patients signed a short consent form; in contrast, 30 of 42 (71%) signed a long form. These trends suggest rural patients are more likely to sign short consent forms. Further study is indicated.",

keywords = "brevity, clinical trials, educational, short consent forms, succinct",

author = "Jana Wieland and Daniel Satele and Yahya Almodallal and Paul Novotny and Pritzl, {Stephanie L.} and Mandrekar, {Sumithra J.} and Aminah Jatoi",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2022.",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1177/23743735221107242",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "9",

journal = "Journal of Patient Experience",

issn = "2374-3735",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Succinct Cancer Clinical Trial Consent Forms in Rural Patients With Cancer

T2 - A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blinded study

AU - Wieland, Jana

AU - Satele, Daniel

AU - Almodallal, Yahya

AU - Novotny, Paul

AU - Pritzl, Stephanie L.

AU - Mandrekar, Sumithra J.

AU - Jatoi, Aminah

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2022.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Rural patients are often underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. This is a secondary analysis of a study that tested short (2000 word) versus long (6000 word) consent forms with a focus on rurality. Among 240 patients, 89 (37%) were rural. Seventy-one (80%) rural and 117 (77%) nonrural patients signed a consent form of any length (P =.68). Forty-one of 47 (87%) rural patients signed a short consent form; in contrast, 30 of 42 (71%) signed a long form. These trends suggest rural patients are more likely to sign short consent forms. Further study is indicated.

AB - Rural patients are often underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. This is a secondary analysis of a study that tested short (2000 word) versus long (6000 word) consent forms with a focus on rurality. Among 240 patients, 89 (37%) were rural. Seventy-one (80%) rural and 117 (77%) nonrural patients signed a consent form of any length (P =.68). Forty-one of 47 (87%) rural patients signed a short consent form; in contrast, 30 of 42 (71%) signed a long form. These trends suggest rural patients are more likely to sign short consent forms. Further study is indicated.

KW - brevity

KW - clinical trials

KW - educational

KW - short consent forms

KW - succinct

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132585851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132585851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/23743735221107242

DO - 10.1177/23743735221107242

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85132585851

SN - 2374-3735

VL - 9

JO - Journal of Patient Experience

JF - Journal of Patient Experience

ER -

Succinct Cancer Clinical Trial Consent Forms in Rural Patients With Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blinded study

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this