Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups

K. Yost, C. Perkins, R. Cohen, C. Morris, W. Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

520 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The majority of research on breast cancer risk and socioeconomic status (SES) has been conducted for blacks and whites. This study evaluates the relationship between SES and breast cancer incidence in California for four race/ethnic groups. Methods: Principal component analysis was used to create an SES index using 1990 Census data. Untracted cases were randomly allocated to census block groups within their county of residence. A total of 97,227 female breast cancer cases diagnosed in California between 1988 and 1992 were evaluated. Incidence rates and rate ratios (RRs) were estimated and a x2 test for trend across SES levels was performed. Results: SES was positively related to breast cancer incidence, and this effect was stronger for Hispanics and Asian/others than for whites and blacks. Adjusting by SES did not eliminate the differences in breast cancer rates among race/ethnic groups. RR differences between the race/ethnic groups were greatest in the lowest SES category and attenuated with increasing SES. An increasing trend over SES was statistically significant for all race/ethnic groups. Including randomly allocated cases affected RR estimates for white women only. Conclusions: Our results are consistent with similar findings for the Los Angeles area but differ from previous results for the San Francisco Bay area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)703-711
Number of pages9
JournalCancer Causes and Control
Volume12
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Keywords

  • Breast neoplasms
  • Censuses
  • Ethnic groups
  • Racial differences
  • Social class

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this