Social Support and Prognosis in Patients at Increased Psychosocial Risk Recovering From Myocardial Infarction

Heather S. Lett, James A. Blumenthal, Michael A. Babyak, Diane J. Catellier, Robert M. Carney, Lisa F. Berkman, Matthew M. Burg, Pamela Mitchell, Allan S Jaffe, Neil Schneiderman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the impact of network support and different types of perceived functional support on all-cause mortality or nonfatal reinfarction for patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design: Participants were recruited from the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) trial; 2,481 AMI patients with depression or low social support were randomized to a cognitive-behavioral intervention or to a usual care control group. Data collection for certain measures of social support was limited: 2,466 participants completed the ENRICHD Social Support Inventory; 2,457 completed the Perceived Social Support Scale; 1,296 completed the Social Network Questionnaire; and 707 completed the Interpersonal Support and Evaluation List, Tangible Support subscale. Patients also completed the Beck Depression Inventory and were followed for up to 4.5 years. Main Outcome Measure: Time to death or nonfatal reinfarction. Results: Over the follow-up period, 599 patients (24%) died or had a nonfatal AMI. Survival models controlling age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, smoking, antidepressant use, and a composite measure of increased risk revealed that higher levels of perceived social support were associated with improved outcome for patients without elevated depression but not for patients with high levels of depression. Neither perceived tangible support nor network support were associated with more frequent adverse events. Conclusion: AMI patients should be assessed for multiple dimensions of perceived functional support and depression to identify those at increased psychosocial risk who may benefit from treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)418-427
Number of pages10
JournalHealth Psychology
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007

Fingerprint

Social Support
Myocardial Infarction
Depression
Coronary Disease
Equipment and Supplies
Social Class
Antidepressive Agents
Smoking
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Control Groups
Survival
Mortality

Keywords

  • depression
  • myocardial infarction
  • prognosis
  • social support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Lett, H. S., Blumenthal, J. A., Babyak, M. A., Catellier, D. J., Carney, R. M., Berkman, L. F., ... Schneiderman, N. (2007). Social Support and Prognosis in Patients at Increased Psychosocial Risk Recovering From Myocardial Infarction. Health Psychology, 26(4), 418-427. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.418

Social Support and Prognosis in Patients at Increased Psychosocial Risk Recovering From Myocardial Infarction. / Lett, Heather S.; Blumenthal, James A.; Babyak, Michael A.; Catellier, Diane J.; Carney, Robert M.; Berkman, Lisa F.; Burg, Matthew M.; Mitchell, Pamela; Jaffe, Allan S; Schneiderman, Neil.

In: Health Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 4, 07.2007, p. 418-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lett, HS, Blumenthal, JA, Babyak, MA, Catellier, DJ, Carney, RM, Berkman, LF, Burg, MM, Mitchell, P, Jaffe, AS & Schneiderman, N 2007, 'Social Support and Prognosis in Patients at Increased Psychosocial Risk Recovering From Myocardial Infarction', Health Psychology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 418-427. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.418
Lett, Heather S. ; Blumenthal, James A. ; Babyak, Michael A. ; Catellier, Diane J. ; Carney, Robert M. ; Berkman, Lisa F. ; Burg, Matthew M. ; Mitchell, Pamela ; Jaffe, Allan S ; Schneiderman, Neil. / Social Support and Prognosis in Patients at Increased Psychosocial Risk Recovering From Myocardial Infarction. In: Health Psychology. 2007 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 418-427.
@article{74a9e8f915df4ad68b45f4c4a211fcec,
title = "Social Support and Prognosis in Patients at Increased Psychosocial Risk Recovering From Myocardial Infarction",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the impact of network support and different types of perceived functional support on all-cause mortality or nonfatal reinfarction for patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design: Participants were recruited from the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) trial; 2,481 AMI patients with depression or low social support were randomized to a cognitive-behavioral intervention or to a usual care control group. Data collection for certain measures of social support was limited: 2,466 participants completed the ENRICHD Social Support Inventory; 2,457 completed the Perceived Social Support Scale; 1,296 completed the Social Network Questionnaire; and 707 completed the Interpersonal Support and Evaluation List, Tangible Support subscale. Patients also completed the Beck Depression Inventory and were followed for up to 4.5 years. Main Outcome Measure: Time to death or nonfatal reinfarction. Results: Over the follow-up period, 599 patients (24{\%}) died or had a nonfatal AMI. Survival models controlling age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, smoking, antidepressant use, and a composite measure of increased risk revealed that higher levels of perceived social support were associated with improved outcome for patients without elevated depression but not for patients with high levels of depression. Neither perceived tangible support nor network support were associated with more frequent adverse events. Conclusion: AMI patients should be assessed for multiple dimensions of perceived functional support and depression to identify those at increased psychosocial risk who may benefit from treatment.",
keywords = "depression, myocardial infarction, prognosis, social support",
author = "Lett, {Heather S.} and Blumenthal, {James A.} and Babyak, {Michael A.} and Catellier, {Diane J.} and Carney, {Robert M.} and Berkman, {Lisa F.} and Burg, {Matthew M.} and Pamela Mitchell and Jaffe, {Allan S} and Neil Schneiderman",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.418",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "418--427",
journal = "Health Psychology",
issn = "0278-6133",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Support and Prognosis in Patients at Increased Psychosocial Risk Recovering From Myocardial Infarction

AU - Lett, Heather S.

AU - Blumenthal, James A.

AU - Babyak, Michael A.

AU - Catellier, Diane J.

AU - Carney, Robert M.

AU - Berkman, Lisa F.

AU - Burg, Matthew M.

AU - Mitchell, Pamela

AU - Jaffe, Allan S

AU - Schneiderman, Neil

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Objective: To compare the impact of network support and different types of perceived functional support on all-cause mortality or nonfatal reinfarction for patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design: Participants were recruited from the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) trial; 2,481 AMI patients with depression or low social support were randomized to a cognitive-behavioral intervention or to a usual care control group. Data collection for certain measures of social support was limited: 2,466 participants completed the ENRICHD Social Support Inventory; 2,457 completed the Perceived Social Support Scale; 1,296 completed the Social Network Questionnaire; and 707 completed the Interpersonal Support and Evaluation List, Tangible Support subscale. Patients also completed the Beck Depression Inventory and were followed for up to 4.5 years. Main Outcome Measure: Time to death or nonfatal reinfarction. Results: Over the follow-up period, 599 patients (24%) died or had a nonfatal AMI. Survival models controlling age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, smoking, antidepressant use, and a composite measure of increased risk revealed that higher levels of perceived social support were associated with improved outcome for patients without elevated depression but not for patients with high levels of depression. Neither perceived tangible support nor network support were associated with more frequent adverse events. Conclusion: AMI patients should be assessed for multiple dimensions of perceived functional support and depression to identify those at increased psychosocial risk who may benefit from treatment.

AB - Objective: To compare the impact of network support and different types of perceived functional support on all-cause mortality or nonfatal reinfarction for patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design: Participants were recruited from the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) trial; 2,481 AMI patients with depression or low social support were randomized to a cognitive-behavioral intervention or to a usual care control group. Data collection for certain measures of social support was limited: 2,466 participants completed the ENRICHD Social Support Inventory; 2,457 completed the Perceived Social Support Scale; 1,296 completed the Social Network Questionnaire; and 707 completed the Interpersonal Support and Evaluation List, Tangible Support subscale. Patients also completed the Beck Depression Inventory and were followed for up to 4.5 years. Main Outcome Measure: Time to death or nonfatal reinfarction. Results: Over the follow-up period, 599 patients (24%) died or had a nonfatal AMI. Survival models controlling age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, smoking, antidepressant use, and a composite measure of increased risk revealed that higher levels of perceived social support were associated with improved outcome for patients without elevated depression but not for patients with high levels of depression. Neither perceived tangible support nor network support were associated with more frequent adverse events. Conclusion: AMI patients should be assessed for multiple dimensions of perceived functional support and depression to identify those at increased psychosocial risk who may benefit from treatment.

KW - depression

KW - myocardial infarction

KW - prognosis

KW - social support

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547673567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547673567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.418

DO - 10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.418

M3 - Article

C2 - 17605561

AN - SCOPUS:34547673567

VL - 26

SP - 418

EP - 427

JO - Health Psychology

JF - Health Psychology

SN - 0278-6133

IS - 4

ER -