Should you search the internet for information about your acute symptom?

Frederick North, William J. Ward, Prathibha Varkey, Sidna M. Tulledge-Scheitel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine if symptom-related Web sites give sufficient information for users to seek urgent care when warranted. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 120 Web sites (15 sites for each of eight acute symptoms). Symptom-related sites were identified with Google, Yahoo! ®, and Bing™ searches and focused on potentially hazardous symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, abdominal pain, and syncope. We reviewed each symptom-related site for the presence of critical symptom indicators (key symptom characteristics and associated factors) that triage the user to urgent care. Results: Of the 120 sites reviewed, 41 (33%) contained no critical symptom indicators. No site contained a complete set of critical symptom indicators. Overall, out of the 1,020 total critical symptoms searched for in the sites, we only found 329 (32%). When present, critical symptom indicators were found on the top half of the first page of the site in only 34%. Specific recommendations for further care were absent in 42% of the cases where critical symptom indicators were identified. Conclusions: Symptom-related sites ranked highly by major search engines lack much of the information needed to make a decision about whether a symptom needs urgent attention. When present, this information is usually not located where users can rapidly access it and often lacks prescriptive guidance for users to seek care. Until more sites contain at least minimal triage advice, relying on an Internet search to help determine the urgency of a symptom could be risky.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)213-218
Number of pages6
JournalTelemedicine and e-Health
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2012

Fingerprint

Triage
Ambulatory Care
Internet
Search Engine
Syncope
Chest Pain
Dyspnea
Abdominal Pain

Keywords

  • e-health
  • telehealth
  • telemedicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

North, F., Ward, W. J., Varkey, P., & Tulledge-Scheitel, S. M. (2012). Should you search the internet for information about your acute symptom? Telemedicine and e-Health, 18(3), 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2011.0127

Should you search the internet for information about your acute symptom? / North, Frederick; Ward, William J.; Varkey, Prathibha; Tulledge-Scheitel, Sidna M.

In: Telemedicine and e-Health, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.04.2012, p. 213-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

North, F, Ward, WJ, Varkey, P & Tulledge-Scheitel, SM 2012, 'Should you search the internet for information about your acute symptom?', Telemedicine and e-Health, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2011.0127
North, Frederick ; Ward, William J. ; Varkey, Prathibha ; Tulledge-Scheitel, Sidna M. / Should you search the internet for information about your acute symptom?. In: Telemedicine and e-Health. 2012 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 213-218.
@article{b8631a1b4fe34a47935dbdc15983f681,
title = "Should you search the internet for information about your acute symptom?",
abstract = "Objective: To determine if symptom-related Web sites give sufficient information for users to seek urgent care when warranted. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 120 Web sites (15 sites for each of eight acute symptoms). Symptom-related sites were identified with Google, Yahoo! {\circledR}, and Bing™ searches and focused on potentially hazardous symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, abdominal pain, and syncope. We reviewed each symptom-related site for the presence of critical symptom indicators (key symptom characteristics and associated factors) that triage the user to urgent care. Results: Of the 120 sites reviewed, 41 (33{\%}) contained no critical symptom indicators. No site contained a complete set of critical symptom indicators. Overall, out of the 1,020 total critical symptoms searched for in the sites, we only found 329 (32{\%}). When present, critical symptom indicators were found on the top half of the first page of the site in only 34{\%}. Specific recommendations for further care were absent in 42{\%} of the cases where critical symptom indicators were identified. Conclusions: Symptom-related sites ranked highly by major search engines lack much of the information needed to make a decision about whether a symptom needs urgent attention. When present, this information is usually not located where users can rapidly access it and often lacks prescriptive guidance for users to seek care. Until more sites contain at least minimal triage advice, relying on an Internet search to help determine the urgency of a symptom could be risky.",
keywords = "e-health, telehealth, telemedicine",
author = "Frederick North and Ward, {William J.} and Prathibha Varkey and Tulledge-Scheitel, {Sidna M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/tmj.2011.0127",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "213--218",
journal = "Telemedicine Journal and e-Health",
issn = "1530-5627",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should you search the internet for information about your acute symptom?

AU - North, Frederick

AU - Ward, William J.

AU - Varkey, Prathibha

AU - Tulledge-Scheitel, Sidna M.

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - Objective: To determine if symptom-related Web sites give sufficient information for users to seek urgent care when warranted. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 120 Web sites (15 sites for each of eight acute symptoms). Symptom-related sites were identified with Google, Yahoo! ®, and Bing™ searches and focused on potentially hazardous symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, abdominal pain, and syncope. We reviewed each symptom-related site for the presence of critical symptom indicators (key symptom characteristics and associated factors) that triage the user to urgent care. Results: Of the 120 sites reviewed, 41 (33%) contained no critical symptom indicators. No site contained a complete set of critical symptom indicators. Overall, out of the 1,020 total critical symptoms searched for in the sites, we only found 329 (32%). When present, critical symptom indicators were found on the top half of the first page of the site in only 34%. Specific recommendations for further care were absent in 42% of the cases where critical symptom indicators were identified. Conclusions: Symptom-related sites ranked highly by major search engines lack much of the information needed to make a decision about whether a symptom needs urgent attention. When present, this information is usually not located where users can rapidly access it and often lacks prescriptive guidance for users to seek care. Until more sites contain at least minimal triage advice, relying on an Internet search to help determine the urgency of a symptom could be risky.

AB - Objective: To determine if symptom-related Web sites give sufficient information for users to seek urgent care when warranted. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 120 Web sites (15 sites for each of eight acute symptoms). Symptom-related sites were identified with Google, Yahoo! ®, and Bing™ searches and focused on potentially hazardous symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, abdominal pain, and syncope. We reviewed each symptom-related site for the presence of critical symptom indicators (key symptom characteristics and associated factors) that triage the user to urgent care. Results: Of the 120 sites reviewed, 41 (33%) contained no critical symptom indicators. No site contained a complete set of critical symptom indicators. Overall, out of the 1,020 total critical symptoms searched for in the sites, we only found 329 (32%). When present, critical symptom indicators were found on the top half of the first page of the site in only 34%. Specific recommendations for further care were absent in 42% of the cases where critical symptom indicators were identified. Conclusions: Symptom-related sites ranked highly by major search engines lack much of the information needed to make a decision about whether a symptom needs urgent attention. When present, this information is usually not located where users can rapidly access it and often lacks prescriptive guidance for users to seek care. Until more sites contain at least minimal triage advice, relying on an Internet search to help determine the urgency of a symptom could be risky.

KW - e-health

KW - telehealth

KW - telemedicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859521007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859521007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/tmj.2011.0127

DO - 10.1089/tmj.2011.0127

M3 - Article

C2 - 22364307

AN - SCOPUS:84859521007

VL - 18

SP - 213

EP - 218

JO - Telemedicine Journal and e-Health

JF - Telemedicine Journal and e-Health

SN - 1530-5627

IS - 3

ER -