TY - JOUR
T1 - Should you search the internet for information about your acute symptom?
AU - North, Frederick
AU - Ward, William J.
AU - Varkey, Prathibha
AU - Tulledge-Scheitel, Sidna M.
PY - 2012/4/1
Y1 - 2012/4/1
N2 - Objective: To determine if symptom-related Web sites give sufficient information for users to seek urgent care when warranted. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 120 Web sites (15 sites for each of eight acute symptoms). Symptom-related sites were identified with Google, Yahoo! ®, and Bing™ searches and focused on potentially hazardous symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, abdominal pain, and syncope. We reviewed each symptom-related site for the presence of critical symptom indicators (key symptom characteristics and associated factors) that triage the user to urgent care. Results: Of the 120 sites reviewed, 41 (33%) contained no critical symptom indicators. No site contained a complete set of critical symptom indicators. Overall, out of the 1,020 total critical symptoms searched for in the sites, we only found 329 (32%). When present, critical symptom indicators were found on the top half of the first page of the site in only 34%. Specific recommendations for further care were absent in 42% of the cases where critical symptom indicators were identified. Conclusions: Symptom-related sites ranked highly by major search engines lack much of the information needed to make a decision about whether a symptom needs urgent attention. When present, this information is usually not located where users can rapidly access it and often lacks prescriptive guidance for users to seek care. Until more sites contain at least minimal triage advice, relying on an Internet search to help determine the urgency of a symptom could be risky.
AB - Objective: To determine if symptom-related Web sites give sufficient information for users to seek urgent care when warranted. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 120 Web sites (15 sites for each of eight acute symptoms). Symptom-related sites were identified with Google, Yahoo! ®, and Bing™ searches and focused on potentially hazardous symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, abdominal pain, and syncope. We reviewed each symptom-related site for the presence of critical symptom indicators (key symptom characteristics and associated factors) that triage the user to urgent care. Results: Of the 120 sites reviewed, 41 (33%) contained no critical symptom indicators. No site contained a complete set of critical symptom indicators. Overall, out of the 1,020 total critical symptoms searched for in the sites, we only found 329 (32%). When present, critical symptom indicators were found on the top half of the first page of the site in only 34%. Specific recommendations for further care were absent in 42% of the cases where critical symptom indicators were identified. Conclusions: Symptom-related sites ranked highly by major search engines lack much of the information needed to make a decision about whether a symptom needs urgent attention. When present, this information is usually not located where users can rapidly access it and often lacks prescriptive guidance for users to seek care. Until more sites contain at least minimal triage advice, relying on an Internet search to help determine the urgency of a symptom could be risky.
KW - e-health
KW - telehealth
KW - telemedicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859521007&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859521007&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/tmj.2011.0127
DO - 10.1089/tmj.2011.0127
M3 - Article
C2 - 22364307
AN - SCOPUS:84859521007
SN - 1530-5627
VL - 18
SP - 213
EP - 218
JO - Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
JF - Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
IS - 3
ER -