Should axillary ultrasound be used in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ?

Bijan Ansari, Judy C Boughey, Darcy L. Adamczyk, Amy C Degnim, James W Jakub, Marilyn J. Morton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We evaluated the usefulness of axillary ultrasound (US) in patients with core biopsyproven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Preoperative axillary US, fine-needle aspiration (FNA), and sentinel lymph node (SLN) data from women with DCIS were reviewed. Eighty-two women with DCIS underwent axillary US. In 16 women (19.5%) US was abnormal; however, FNA was negative in all cases. Sixty-one women (74%) underwent SLN surgery; 2 were positive for macrometastasis (3%) and 1 had isolated tumor cells. None of them had an abnormal US. Axillary US did not change the management in any of the cases. Axillary US and FNA did not change the management in any of the 82 cases. In women with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS, positive nodes are uncommon and unlikely to be detected by axillary US. Routine preoperative axillary US is not recommended for pure DCIS on core biopsy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)290-293
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume204
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
Fine Needle Biopsy
Biopsy
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Axillary ultrasound
  • Breast cancer
  • Ductal carcinoma in situ
  • Fine-needle aspiration
  • Sentinel lymph node

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Should axillary ultrasound be used in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ? / Ansari, Bijan; Boughey, Judy C; Adamczyk, Darcy L.; Degnim, Amy C; Jakub, James W; Morton, Marilyn J.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 204, No. 3, 09.2012, p. 290-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{265db9cab302413b959ecc530bbd9704,
title = "Should axillary ultrasound be used in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ?",
abstract = "We evaluated the usefulness of axillary ultrasound (US) in patients with core biopsyproven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Preoperative axillary US, fine-needle aspiration (FNA), and sentinel lymph node (SLN) data from women with DCIS were reviewed. Eighty-two women with DCIS underwent axillary US. In 16 women (19.5{\%}) US was abnormal; however, FNA was negative in all cases. Sixty-one women (74{\%}) underwent SLN surgery; 2 were positive for macrometastasis (3{\%}) and 1 had isolated tumor cells. None of them had an abnormal US. Axillary US did not change the management in any of the cases. Axillary US and FNA did not change the management in any of the 82 cases. In women with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS, positive nodes are uncommon and unlikely to be detected by axillary US. Routine preoperative axillary US is not recommended for pure DCIS on core biopsy.",
keywords = "Axillary ultrasound, Breast cancer, Ductal carcinoma in situ, Fine-needle aspiration, Sentinel lymph node",
author = "Bijan Ansari and Boughey, {Judy C} and Adamczyk, {Darcy L.} and Degnim, {Amy C} and Jakub, {James W} and Morton, {Marilyn J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.11.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "204",
pages = "290--293",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should axillary ultrasound be used in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ?

AU - Ansari, Bijan

AU - Boughey, Judy C

AU - Adamczyk, Darcy L.

AU - Degnim, Amy C

AU - Jakub, James W

AU - Morton, Marilyn J.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - We evaluated the usefulness of axillary ultrasound (US) in patients with core biopsyproven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Preoperative axillary US, fine-needle aspiration (FNA), and sentinel lymph node (SLN) data from women with DCIS were reviewed. Eighty-two women with DCIS underwent axillary US. In 16 women (19.5%) US was abnormal; however, FNA was negative in all cases. Sixty-one women (74%) underwent SLN surgery; 2 were positive for macrometastasis (3%) and 1 had isolated tumor cells. None of them had an abnormal US. Axillary US did not change the management in any of the cases. Axillary US and FNA did not change the management in any of the 82 cases. In women with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS, positive nodes are uncommon and unlikely to be detected by axillary US. Routine preoperative axillary US is not recommended for pure DCIS on core biopsy.

AB - We evaluated the usefulness of axillary ultrasound (US) in patients with core biopsyproven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Preoperative axillary US, fine-needle aspiration (FNA), and sentinel lymph node (SLN) data from women with DCIS were reviewed. Eighty-two women with DCIS underwent axillary US. In 16 women (19.5%) US was abnormal; however, FNA was negative in all cases. Sixty-one women (74%) underwent SLN surgery; 2 were positive for macrometastasis (3%) and 1 had isolated tumor cells. None of them had an abnormal US. Axillary US did not change the management in any of the cases. Axillary US and FNA did not change the management in any of the 82 cases. In women with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS, positive nodes are uncommon and unlikely to be detected by axillary US. Routine preoperative axillary US is not recommended for pure DCIS on core biopsy.

KW - Axillary ultrasound

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Ductal carcinoma in situ

KW - Fine-needle aspiration

KW - Sentinel lymph node

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865263443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865263443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.11.018

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.11.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 22749764

AN - SCOPUS:84865263443

VL - 204

SP - 290

EP - 293

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 3

ER -