Sensitivity of Thoracic Digital Tomosynthesis (DTS) for the Identification of Lung Nodules

Steve G. Langer, Brian D. Graner, Beth A. Schueler, Kenneth A. Fetterly, James M. Kofler, Jayawant Mandrekar, Brian Jack Bartholmai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Thoracic computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for detection lung pathology, yet its efficacy as a screening tool in regards to cost and radiation dose continues to evolve. Chest radiography (CXR) remains a useful and ubiquitous tool for detection and characterization of pulmonary pathology, but reduced sensitivity and specificity compared to CT. This prospective, blinded study compares the sensitivity of digital tomosynthesis (DTS), to that of CT and CXR for the identification and characterization of lung nodules. Ninety-five outpatients received a posteroanterior (PA) and lateral CXR, DTS, and chest CT at one care episode. The CXR and DTS studies were independently interpreted by three thoracic radiologists. The CT studies were used as the gold standard and read by a fourth thoracic radiologist. Nodules were characterized by presence, location, size, and composition. The agreement between observers and the effective radiation dose for each modality was objectively calculated. One hundred forty-five nodules of greatest diameter larger than 4 mm and 215 nodules less than 4 mm were identified by CT. DTS identified significantly more >4 mm nodules than CXR (DTS 32 % vs. CXR 17 %). CXR and DTS showed no significant difference in the ability to identify the smaller nodules or central nodules within 3 cm of the hilum. DTS outperformed CXR in identifying pleural nodules and those nodules located greater than 3 cm from the hilum. Average radiation dose for CXR, DTS, and CT were 0.10, 0.21, and 6.8 mSv, respectively. Thoracic digital tomosynthesis requires significantly less radiation dose than CT and nearly doubles the sensitivity of that of CXR for the identification of lung nodules greater than 4 mm. However, sensitivity and specificity for detection and characterization of lung nodules remains substantially less than CT. The apparent benefits over CXR, low cost, rapid acquisition, and minimal radiation dose of thoracic DTS suggest that it may be a useful procedure. Work-up of a newly diagnosed nodule will likely require CT, given its superior cross-sectional characterization. Further investigation of DTS as a diagnostic, screening, and surveillance tool is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Digital Imaging
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 8 2015

Fingerprint

Tomography
Thorax
Lung
Dosimetry
Radiation
Pathology
Screening
Episode of Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Radiography
Costs
Outpatients
Prospective Studies
Chemical analysis

Keywords

  • Chest
  • CT
  • Digital tomosynthesis
  • Pulmonary nodule
  • Radiography
  • Thoracic imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Sensitivity of Thoracic Digital Tomosynthesis (DTS) for the Identification of Lung Nodules. / Langer, Steve G.; Graner, Brian D.; Schueler, Beth A.; Fetterly, Kenneth A.; Kofler, James M.; Mandrekar, Jayawant; Bartholmai, Brian Jack.

In: Journal of Digital Imaging, 08.09.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Langer, Steve G. ; Graner, Brian D. ; Schueler, Beth A. ; Fetterly, Kenneth A. ; Kofler, James M. ; Mandrekar, Jayawant ; Bartholmai, Brian Jack. / Sensitivity of Thoracic Digital Tomosynthesis (DTS) for the Identification of Lung Nodules. In: Journal of Digital Imaging. 2015.
@article{235424a62eed4f2a88200eac4bc9b97a,
title = "Sensitivity of Thoracic Digital Tomosynthesis (DTS) for the Identification of Lung Nodules",
abstract = "Thoracic computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for detection lung pathology, yet its efficacy as a screening tool in regards to cost and radiation dose continues to evolve. Chest radiography (CXR) remains a useful and ubiquitous tool for detection and characterization of pulmonary pathology, but reduced sensitivity and specificity compared to CT. This prospective, blinded study compares the sensitivity of digital tomosynthesis (DTS), to that of CT and CXR for the identification and characterization of lung nodules. Ninety-five outpatients received a posteroanterior (PA) and lateral CXR, DTS, and chest CT at one care episode. The CXR and DTS studies were independently interpreted by three thoracic radiologists. The CT studies were used as the gold standard and read by a fourth thoracic radiologist. Nodules were characterized by presence, location, size, and composition. The agreement between observers and the effective radiation dose for each modality was objectively calculated. One hundred forty-five nodules of greatest diameter larger than 4 mm and 215 nodules less than 4 mm were identified by CT. DTS identified significantly more >4 mm nodules than CXR (DTS 32 {\%} vs. CXR 17 {\%}). CXR and DTS showed no significant difference in the ability to identify the smaller nodules or central nodules within 3 cm of the hilum. DTS outperformed CXR in identifying pleural nodules and those nodules located greater than 3 cm from the hilum. Average radiation dose for CXR, DTS, and CT were 0.10, 0.21, and 6.8 mSv, respectively. Thoracic digital tomosynthesis requires significantly less radiation dose than CT and nearly doubles the sensitivity of that of CXR for the identification of lung nodules greater than 4 mm. However, sensitivity and specificity for detection and characterization of lung nodules remains substantially less than CT. The apparent benefits over CXR, low cost, rapid acquisition, and minimal radiation dose of thoracic DTS suggest that it may be a useful procedure. Work-up of a newly diagnosed nodule will likely require CT, given its superior cross-sectional characterization. Further investigation of DTS as a diagnostic, screening, and surveillance tool is warranted.",
keywords = "Chest, CT, Digital tomosynthesis, Pulmonary nodule, Radiography, Thoracic imaging",
author = "Langer, {Steve G.} and Graner, {Brian D.} and Schueler, {Beth A.} and Fetterly, {Kenneth A.} and Kofler, {James M.} and Jayawant Mandrekar and Bartholmai, {Brian Jack}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s10278-015-9818-0",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Digital Imaging",
issn = "0897-1889",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity of Thoracic Digital Tomosynthesis (DTS) for the Identification of Lung Nodules

AU - Langer, Steve G.

AU - Graner, Brian D.

AU - Schueler, Beth A.

AU - Fetterly, Kenneth A.

AU - Kofler, James M.

AU - Mandrekar, Jayawant

AU - Bartholmai, Brian Jack

PY - 2015/9/8

Y1 - 2015/9/8

N2 - Thoracic computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for detection lung pathology, yet its efficacy as a screening tool in regards to cost and radiation dose continues to evolve. Chest radiography (CXR) remains a useful and ubiquitous tool for detection and characterization of pulmonary pathology, but reduced sensitivity and specificity compared to CT. This prospective, blinded study compares the sensitivity of digital tomosynthesis (DTS), to that of CT and CXR for the identification and characterization of lung nodules. Ninety-five outpatients received a posteroanterior (PA) and lateral CXR, DTS, and chest CT at one care episode. The CXR and DTS studies were independently interpreted by three thoracic radiologists. The CT studies were used as the gold standard and read by a fourth thoracic radiologist. Nodules were characterized by presence, location, size, and composition. The agreement between observers and the effective radiation dose for each modality was objectively calculated. One hundred forty-five nodules of greatest diameter larger than 4 mm and 215 nodules less than 4 mm were identified by CT. DTS identified significantly more >4 mm nodules than CXR (DTS 32 % vs. CXR 17 %). CXR and DTS showed no significant difference in the ability to identify the smaller nodules or central nodules within 3 cm of the hilum. DTS outperformed CXR in identifying pleural nodules and those nodules located greater than 3 cm from the hilum. Average radiation dose for CXR, DTS, and CT were 0.10, 0.21, and 6.8 mSv, respectively. Thoracic digital tomosynthesis requires significantly less radiation dose than CT and nearly doubles the sensitivity of that of CXR for the identification of lung nodules greater than 4 mm. However, sensitivity and specificity for detection and characterization of lung nodules remains substantially less than CT. The apparent benefits over CXR, low cost, rapid acquisition, and minimal radiation dose of thoracic DTS suggest that it may be a useful procedure. Work-up of a newly diagnosed nodule will likely require CT, given its superior cross-sectional characterization. Further investigation of DTS as a diagnostic, screening, and surveillance tool is warranted.

AB - Thoracic computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for detection lung pathology, yet its efficacy as a screening tool in regards to cost and radiation dose continues to evolve. Chest radiography (CXR) remains a useful and ubiquitous tool for detection and characterization of pulmonary pathology, but reduced sensitivity and specificity compared to CT. This prospective, blinded study compares the sensitivity of digital tomosynthesis (DTS), to that of CT and CXR for the identification and characterization of lung nodules. Ninety-five outpatients received a posteroanterior (PA) and lateral CXR, DTS, and chest CT at one care episode. The CXR and DTS studies were independently interpreted by three thoracic radiologists. The CT studies were used as the gold standard and read by a fourth thoracic radiologist. Nodules were characterized by presence, location, size, and composition. The agreement between observers and the effective radiation dose for each modality was objectively calculated. One hundred forty-five nodules of greatest diameter larger than 4 mm and 215 nodules less than 4 mm were identified by CT. DTS identified significantly more >4 mm nodules than CXR (DTS 32 % vs. CXR 17 %). CXR and DTS showed no significant difference in the ability to identify the smaller nodules or central nodules within 3 cm of the hilum. DTS outperformed CXR in identifying pleural nodules and those nodules located greater than 3 cm from the hilum. Average radiation dose for CXR, DTS, and CT were 0.10, 0.21, and 6.8 mSv, respectively. Thoracic digital tomosynthesis requires significantly less radiation dose than CT and nearly doubles the sensitivity of that of CXR for the identification of lung nodules greater than 4 mm. However, sensitivity and specificity for detection and characterization of lung nodules remains substantially less than CT. The apparent benefits over CXR, low cost, rapid acquisition, and minimal radiation dose of thoracic DTS suggest that it may be a useful procedure. Work-up of a newly diagnosed nodule will likely require CT, given its superior cross-sectional characterization. Further investigation of DTS as a diagnostic, screening, and surveillance tool is warranted.

KW - Chest

KW - CT

KW - Digital tomosynthesis

KW - Pulmonary nodule

KW - Radiography

KW - Thoracic imaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940999588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940999588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10278-015-9818-0

DO - 10.1007/s10278-015-9818-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 26349914

AN - SCOPUS:84955359545

JO - Journal of Digital Imaging

JF - Journal of Digital Imaging

SN - 0897-1889

ER -