Safety and efficacy of fistula closure by endoscopic suturing: a multi-center study

Saurabh Mukewar, Nitin Kumar, Marc Catalano, Christopher Thompson, Wasif Abidi, William Harmsen, Felicity T Enders, Christopher Gostout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and aim: Endoscopic closure of fistulas is desirable but remains a challenge, especially for gastrogastric fistulas. The aim of this study was to assess the success rate for the closure of gastrointestinal fistulas using an endoscopic suturing device. Patients and methods: Electronic records at three medical centers were reviewed to identify patients who underwent sutured fistula closure as recorded on a central database. Demographic details, clinical variables, and details of the endoscopic procedure were recorded. Results: A total of 56 patients (mean age 54 ± 12.7 years) underwent fistula closure. Gastrogastric fistulas were most common (n?=?29; 51.8?%). Sixteen patients (28.6?%) had undergone previous failed attempts at closure. Immediate success was universal (n?=?56; 100?%). Thirteen patients had persistent closure without any need for further therapies, while 17 underwent additional endoscopic procedures, with successful closure in 4?/17. Only one patient had abdominal pain requiring hospital admission. Conclusion: Sutured closure of fistulas in a single session is safe and can be expected, even in what are known to be challenging cases. Sequential closure for recurrences is sometimes successful in the longer term.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEndoscopy
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 4 2016

Fingerprint

Fistula
Safety
Abdominal Pain
Demography
Databases
Recurrence
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Mukewar, S., Kumar, N., Catalano, M., Thompson, C., Abidi, W., Harmsen, W., ... Gostout, C. (Accepted/In press). Safety and efficacy of fistula closure by endoscopic suturing: a multi-center study. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-114036

Safety and efficacy of fistula closure by endoscopic suturing : a multi-center study. / Mukewar, Saurabh; Kumar, Nitin; Catalano, Marc; Thompson, Christopher; Abidi, Wasif; Harmsen, William; Enders, Felicity T; Gostout, Christopher.

In: Endoscopy, 04.07.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mukewar, S, Kumar, N, Catalano, M, Thompson, C, Abidi, W, Harmsen, W, Enders, FT & Gostout, C 2016, 'Safety and efficacy of fistula closure by endoscopic suturing: a multi-center study', Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-114036
Mukewar S, Kumar N, Catalano M, Thompson C, Abidi W, Harmsen W et al. Safety and efficacy of fistula closure by endoscopic suturing: a multi-center study. Endoscopy. 2016 Jul 4. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-114036
Mukewar, Saurabh ; Kumar, Nitin ; Catalano, Marc ; Thompson, Christopher ; Abidi, Wasif ; Harmsen, William ; Enders, Felicity T ; Gostout, Christopher. / Safety and efficacy of fistula closure by endoscopic suturing : a multi-center study. In: Endoscopy. 2016.
@article{30c3ba85e384462fb890e3a0bd53ecae,
title = "Safety and efficacy of fistula closure by endoscopic suturing: a multi-center study",
abstract = "Background and aim: Endoscopic closure of fistulas is desirable but remains a challenge, especially for gastrogastric fistulas. The aim of this study was to assess the success rate for the closure of gastrointestinal fistulas using an endoscopic suturing device. Patients and methods: Electronic records at three medical centers were reviewed to identify patients who underwent sutured fistula closure as recorded on a central database. Demographic details, clinical variables, and details of the endoscopic procedure were recorded. Results: A total of 56 patients (mean age 54 ± 12.7 years) underwent fistula closure. Gastrogastric fistulas were most common (n?=?29; 51.8?{\%}). Sixteen patients (28.6?{\%}) had undergone previous failed attempts at closure. Immediate success was universal (n?=?56; 100?{\%}). Thirteen patients had persistent closure without any need for further therapies, while 17 underwent additional endoscopic procedures, with successful closure in 4?/17. Only one patient had abdominal pain requiring hospital admission. Conclusion: Sutured closure of fistulas in a single session is safe and can be expected, even in what are known to be challenging cases. Sequential closure for recurrences is sometimes successful in the longer term.",
author = "Saurabh Mukewar and Nitin Kumar and Marc Catalano and Christopher Thompson and Wasif Abidi and William Harmsen and Enders, {Felicity T} and Christopher Gostout",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1055/s-0042-114036",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Endoscopy",
issn = "0013-726X",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety and efficacy of fistula closure by endoscopic suturing

T2 - a multi-center study

AU - Mukewar, Saurabh

AU - Kumar, Nitin

AU - Catalano, Marc

AU - Thompson, Christopher

AU - Abidi, Wasif

AU - Harmsen, William

AU - Enders, Felicity T

AU - Gostout, Christopher

PY - 2016/7/4

Y1 - 2016/7/4

N2 - Background and aim: Endoscopic closure of fistulas is desirable but remains a challenge, especially for gastrogastric fistulas. The aim of this study was to assess the success rate for the closure of gastrointestinal fistulas using an endoscopic suturing device. Patients and methods: Electronic records at three medical centers were reviewed to identify patients who underwent sutured fistula closure as recorded on a central database. Demographic details, clinical variables, and details of the endoscopic procedure were recorded. Results: A total of 56 patients (mean age 54 ± 12.7 years) underwent fistula closure. Gastrogastric fistulas were most common (n?=?29; 51.8?%). Sixteen patients (28.6?%) had undergone previous failed attempts at closure. Immediate success was universal (n?=?56; 100?%). Thirteen patients had persistent closure without any need for further therapies, while 17 underwent additional endoscopic procedures, with successful closure in 4?/17. Only one patient had abdominal pain requiring hospital admission. Conclusion: Sutured closure of fistulas in a single session is safe and can be expected, even in what are known to be challenging cases. Sequential closure for recurrences is sometimes successful in the longer term.

AB - Background and aim: Endoscopic closure of fistulas is desirable but remains a challenge, especially for gastrogastric fistulas. The aim of this study was to assess the success rate for the closure of gastrointestinal fistulas using an endoscopic suturing device. Patients and methods: Electronic records at three medical centers were reviewed to identify patients who underwent sutured fistula closure as recorded on a central database. Demographic details, clinical variables, and details of the endoscopic procedure were recorded. Results: A total of 56 patients (mean age 54 ± 12.7 years) underwent fistula closure. Gastrogastric fistulas were most common (n?=?29; 51.8?%). Sixteen patients (28.6?%) had undergone previous failed attempts at closure. Immediate success was universal (n?=?56; 100?%). Thirteen patients had persistent closure without any need for further therapies, while 17 underwent additional endoscopic procedures, with successful closure in 4?/17. Only one patient had abdominal pain requiring hospital admission. Conclusion: Sutured closure of fistulas in a single session is safe and can be expected, even in what are known to be challenging cases. Sequential closure for recurrences is sometimes successful in the longer term.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984802081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984802081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0042-114036

DO - 10.1055/s-0042-114036

M3 - Article

C2 - 27576179

AN - SCOPUS:84984802081

JO - Endoscopy

JF - Endoscopy

SN - 0013-726X

ER -