Retained capsule endoscopy in a large tertiary care academic practice and radiologic predictors of retention

Badr Al-Bawardy, Giles Locke, James E. Huprich, Joel Garland Fletcher, Jeff L. Fidler, John M. Barlow, Brenda Becker, Elizabeth Rajan, Edward Vincent Loftus, Jr, David H. Bruining, Stephanie L. Hansel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Capsule retention reported rates range between 1% and 13%. This study aims to determine the incidence of, risk factors for, and clinical outcomes of capsule retention in a large heterogenous cohort of patients and define cross-sectional imaging findings predictive of capsule retention. Methods: A retrospective review of all capsule endoscopy (CE) examinations performed at our center from January 2002 to January 2013 was undertaken. Data on patient demographics, CE indication, findings, and details of management were analyzed. Radiologic images of patients with computed tomography scan performed 6 months before CE for patients with CE retention and for controls without CE retention but at high risk based on clinical computed tomography reports were examined by a gastrointestinal radiologist, blinded to history, and classified as worrisome based on the presence of stricture, partial obstruction, or small bowel (SB) anastomosis. Results: Seventeen CE retentions (0.3%) occurred in 15 patients. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (47%) was the most common indication. Outcomes included surgical intervention (n 10), endoscopic retrieval (n 2), passing of capsule after treatment of inflammation (n 3), passage after conservative measures for SB obstruction (n 1), and loss to follow-up (n 1). Patients with CE retention were more likely to have SB anastomoses (88% versus 23%) and partial obstruction (63% versus 38%) than patients with high-risk features for capsule retention who passed the capsule. Conclusions: In a tertiary care population without obstructive symptoms, capsule retention occurred in only 0.3% of cases. Review of surgical history and prior imaging for obstruction or SB anastomoses may help to reduce retention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2158-2164
Number of pages7
JournalInflammatory Bowel Diseases
Volume21
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 12 2015

Fingerprint

Capsule Endoscopy
Tertiary Healthcare
Capsules
History
Tomography
Pathologic Constriction
Demography
Hemorrhage
Inflammation
Incidence

Keywords

  • capsule endoscopy
  • capsule retention
  • small bowel anastomosis
  • small bowel obstruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Immunology and Allergy

Cite this

Retained capsule endoscopy in a large tertiary care academic practice and radiologic predictors of retention. / Al-Bawardy, Badr; Locke, Giles; Huprich, James E.; Fletcher, Joel Garland; Fidler, Jeff L.; Barlow, John M.; Becker, Brenda; Rajan, Elizabeth; Loftus, Jr, Edward Vincent; Bruining, David H.; Hansel, Stephanie L.

In: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Vol. 21, No. 9, 12.06.2015, p. 2158-2164.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Al-Bawardy, B, Locke, G, Huprich, JE, Fletcher, JG, Fidler, JL, Barlow, JM, Becker, B, Rajan, E, Loftus, Jr, EV, Bruining, DH & Hansel, SL 2015, 'Retained capsule endoscopy in a large tertiary care academic practice and radiologic predictors of retention', Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 2158-2164. https://doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000000482
Al-Bawardy, Badr ; Locke, Giles ; Huprich, James E. ; Fletcher, Joel Garland ; Fidler, Jeff L. ; Barlow, John M. ; Becker, Brenda ; Rajan, Elizabeth ; Loftus, Jr, Edward Vincent ; Bruining, David H. ; Hansel, Stephanie L. / Retained capsule endoscopy in a large tertiary care academic practice and radiologic predictors of retention. In: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2015 ; Vol. 21, No. 9. pp. 2158-2164.
@article{8a45e829729342eaa48e5e6d14c60a3e,
title = "Retained capsule endoscopy in a large tertiary care academic practice and radiologic predictors of retention",
abstract = "Background: Capsule retention reported rates range between 1{\%} and 13{\%}. This study aims to determine the incidence of, risk factors for, and clinical outcomes of capsule retention in a large heterogenous cohort of patients and define cross-sectional imaging findings predictive of capsule retention. Methods: A retrospective review of all capsule endoscopy (CE) examinations performed at our center from January 2002 to January 2013 was undertaken. Data on patient demographics, CE indication, findings, and details of management were analyzed. Radiologic images of patients with computed tomography scan performed 6 months before CE for patients with CE retention and for controls without CE retention but at high risk based on clinical computed tomography reports were examined by a gastrointestinal radiologist, blinded to history, and classified as worrisome based on the presence of stricture, partial obstruction, or small bowel (SB) anastomosis. Results: Seventeen CE retentions (0.3{\%}) occurred in 15 patients. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (47{\%}) was the most common indication. Outcomes included surgical intervention (n 10), endoscopic retrieval (n 2), passing of capsule after treatment of inflammation (n 3), passage after conservative measures for SB obstruction (n 1), and loss to follow-up (n 1). Patients with CE retention were more likely to have SB anastomoses (88{\%} versus 23{\%}) and partial obstruction (63{\%} versus 38{\%}) than patients with high-risk features for capsule retention who passed the capsule. Conclusions: In a tertiary care population without obstructive symptoms, capsule retention occurred in only 0.3{\%} of cases. Review of surgical history and prior imaging for obstruction or SB anastomoses may help to reduce retention.",
keywords = "capsule endoscopy, capsule retention, small bowel anastomosis, small bowel obstruction",
author = "Badr Al-Bawardy and Giles Locke and Huprich, {James E.} and Fletcher, {Joel Garland} and Fidler, {Jeff L.} and Barlow, {John M.} and Brenda Becker and Elizabeth Rajan and {Loftus, Jr}, {Edward Vincent} and Bruining, {David H.} and Hansel, {Stephanie L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1097/MIB.0000000000000482",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "2158--2164",
journal = "Inflammatory Bowel Diseases",
issn = "1078-0998",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retained capsule endoscopy in a large tertiary care academic practice and radiologic predictors of retention

AU - Al-Bawardy, Badr

AU - Locke, Giles

AU - Huprich, James E.

AU - Fletcher, Joel Garland

AU - Fidler, Jeff L.

AU - Barlow, John M.

AU - Becker, Brenda

AU - Rajan, Elizabeth

AU - Loftus, Jr, Edward Vincent

AU - Bruining, David H.

AU - Hansel, Stephanie L.

PY - 2015/6/12

Y1 - 2015/6/12

N2 - Background: Capsule retention reported rates range between 1% and 13%. This study aims to determine the incidence of, risk factors for, and clinical outcomes of capsule retention in a large heterogenous cohort of patients and define cross-sectional imaging findings predictive of capsule retention. Methods: A retrospective review of all capsule endoscopy (CE) examinations performed at our center from January 2002 to January 2013 was undertaken. Data on patient demographics, CE indication, findings, and details of management were analyzed. Radiologic images of patients with computed tomography scan performed 6 months before CE for patients with CE retention and for controls without CE retention but at high risk based on clinical computed tomography reports were examined by a gastrointestinal radiologist, blinded to history, and classified as worrisome based on the presence of stricture, partial obstruction, or small bowel (SB) anastomosis. Results: Seventeen CE retentions (0.3%) occurred in 15 patients. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (47%) was the most common indication. Outcomes included surgical intervention (n 10), endoscopic retrieval (n 2), passing of capsule after treatment of inflammation (n 3), passage after conservative measures for SB obstruction (n 1), and loss to follow-up (n 1). Patients with CE retention were more likely to have SB anastomoses (88% versus 23%) and partial obstruction (63% versus 38%) than patients with high-risk features for capsule retention who passed the capsule. Conclusions: In a tertiary care population without obstructive symptoms, capsule retention occurred in only 0.3% of cases. Review of surgical history and prior imaging for obstruction or SB anastomoses may help to reduce retention.

AB - Background: Capsule retention reported rates range between 1% and 13%. This study aims to determine the incidence of, risk factors for, and clinical outcomes of capsule retention in a large heterogenous cohort of patients and define cross-sectional imaging findings predictive of capsule retention. Methods: A retrospective review of all capsule endoscopy (CE) examinations performed at our center from January 2002 to January 2013 was undertaken. Data on patient demographics, CE indication, findings, and details of management were analyzed. Radiologic images of patients with computed tomography scan performed 6 months before CE for patients with CE retention and for controls without CE retention but at high risk based on clinical computed tomography reports were examined by a gastrointestinal radiologist, blinded to history, and classified as worrisome based on the presence of stricture, partial obstruction, or small bowel (SB) anastomosis. Results: Seventeen CE retentions (0.3%) occurred in 15 patients. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (47%) was the most common indication. Outcomes included surgical intervention (n 10), endoscopic retrieval (n 2), passing of capsule after treatment of inflammation (n 3), passage after conservative measures for SB obstruction (n 1), and loss to follow-up (n 1). Patients with CE retention were more likely to have SB anastomoses (88% versus 23%) and partial obstruction (63% versus 38%) than patients with high-risk features for capsule retention who passed the capsule. Conclusions: In a tertiary care population without obstructive symptoms, capsule retention occurred in only 0.3% of cases. Review of surgical history and prior imaging for obstruction or SB anastomoses may help to reduce retention.

KW - capsule endoscopy

KW - capsule retention

KW - small bowel anastomosis

KW - small bowel obstruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940921590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940921590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000482

DO - 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000482

M3 - Article

C2 - 26284295

AN - SCOPUS:84940921590

VL - 21

SP - 2158

EP - 2164

JO - Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

JF - Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

SN - 1078-0998

IS - 9

ER -