Redefining and Contextualizing the Hospital Volume-Outcome Relationship for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Implications for Centralization of Care

Boris Gershman, Sarah K. Meier, Molly M. Jeffery, Daniel M. Moreira, Matthew K. Tollefson, Simon P. Kim, Robert Jeffrey Karnes, Nilay D Shah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has undergone rapid dissemination driven in part by market forces to become the most frequently used surgical approach in the management of prostate cancer. Accordingly, a critical analysis of its volume-outcome relationship has important health policy implications. Therefore, we evaluated the association of hospital robot-assisted radical prostatectomy volume with perioperative outcomes, and examined the distribution of hospital procedure volume to contextualize the volume-outcome relationship. Materials and Methods We identified 140,671 men who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy from 2009 to 2011 in NIS (Nationwide Inpatient Sample). The associations of hospital volume with perioperative outcomes and total hospital costs were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear models. Results In 2011, 70% of hospitals averaged 1 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy per week or less, accounting for 28% of surgeries. Compared to patients treated at the lowest quartile hospitals, those treated at the highest quartile hospitals had significantly lower rates of intraoperative complications (0.6% vs 1.4%), postoperative complications (4.8% vs 13.9%), perioperative blood transfusion (1.5% vs 4.0%), prolonged hospitalization (4.3% vs 13.8%) and mean total hospital costs ($12,647 vs $15,394, all ptrend <0.001). When modeled as a nonlinear continuous variable, increasing hospital volume was independently associated with improved rates of each perioperative end point up to approximately 100 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies per year, beyond which there appeared to be marginal improvement. Conclusions Increasing hospital robot-assisted radical prostatectomy volume was associated with improved perioperative outcomes up to approximately 100 surgeries per year, beyond which there appeared to be marginal improvement. A substantial proportion of these procedures is performed at low volume hospitals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)92-99
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume198
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Hospital Costs
Low-Volume Hospitals
Intraoperative Complications
Health Policy
Blood Transfusion
Inpatients
Linear Models
Prostatic Neoplasms
Hospitalization
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • hospitals
  • low-volume
  • prostatectomy
  • prostatic neoplasms
  • robotics
  • treatment outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Redefining and Contextualizing the Hospital Volume-Outcome Relationship for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy : Implications for Centralization of Care. / Gershman, Boris; Meier, Sarah K.; Jeffery, Molly M.; Moreira, Daniel M.; Tollefson, Matthew K.; Kim, Simon P.; Karnes, Robert Jeffrey; Shah, Nilay D.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 198, No. 1, 01.07.2017, p. 92-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gershman, Boris ; Meier, Sarah K. ; Jeffery, Molly M. ; Moreira, Daniel M. ; Tollefson, Matthew K. ; Kim, Simon P. ; Karnes, Robert Jeffrey ; Shah, Nilay D. / Redefining and Contextualizing the Hospital Volume-Outcome Relationship for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy : Implications for Centralization of Care. In: Journal of Urology. 2017 ; Vol. 198, No. 1. pp. 92-99.
@article{5a178f2484e7485db526d0070d788930,
title = "Redefining and Contextualizing the Hospital Volume-Outcome Relationship for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Centralization of Care",
abstract = "Purpose Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has undergone rapid dissemination driven in part by market forces to become the most frequently used surgical approach in the management of prostate cancer. Accordingly, a critical analysis of its volume-outcome relationship has important health policy implications. Therefore, we evaluated the association of hospital robot-assisted radical prostatectomy volume with perioperative outcomes, and examined the distribution of hospital procedure volume to contextualize the volume-outcome relationship. Materials and Methods We identified 140,671 men who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy from 2009 to 2011 in NIS (Nationwide Inpatient Sample). The associations of hospital volume with perioperative outcomes and total hospital costs were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear models. Results In 2011, 70{\%} of hospitals averaged 1 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy per week or less, accounting for 28{\%} of surgeries. Compared to patients treated at the lowest quartile hospitals, those treated at the highest quartile hospitals had significantly lower rates of intraoperative complications (0.6{\%} vs 1.4{\%}), postoperative complications (4.8{\%} vs 13.9{\%}), perioperative blood transfusion (1.5{\%} vs 4.0{\%}), prolonged hospitalization (4.3{\%} vs 13.8{\%}) and mean total hospital costs ($12,647 vs $15,394, all ptrend <0.001). When modeled as a nonlinear continuous variable, increasing hospital volume was independently associated with improved rates of each perioperative end point up to approximately 100 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies per year, beyond which there appeared to be marginal improvement. Conclusions Increasing hospital robot-assisted radical prostatectomy volume was associated with improved perioperative outcomes up to approximately 100 surgeries per year, beyond which there appeared to be marginal improvement. A substantial proportion of these procedures is performed at low volume hospitals.",
keywords = "hospitals, low-volume, prostatectomy, prostatic neoplasms, robotics, treatment outcome",
author = "Boris Gershman and Meier, {Sarah K.} and Jeffery, {Molly M.} and Moreira, {Daniel M.} and Tollefson, {Matthew K.} and Kim, {Simon P.} and Karnes, {Robert Jeffrey} and Shah, {Nilay D}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.067",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "198",
pages = "92--99",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Redefining and Contextualizing the Hospital Volume-Outcome Relationship for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

T2 - Implications for Centralization of Care

AU - Gershman, Boris

AU - Meier, Sarah K.

AU - Jeffery, Molly M.

AU - Moreira, Daniel M.

AU - Tollefson, Matthew K.

AU - Kim, Simon P.

AU - Karnes, Robert Jeffrey

AU - Shah, Nilay D

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Purpose Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has undergone rapid dissemination driven in part by market forces to become the most frequently used surgical approach in the management of prostate cancer. Accordingly, a critical analysis of its volume-outcome relationship has important health policy implications. Therefore, we evaluated the association of hospital robot-assisted radical prostatectomy volume with perioperative outcomes, and examined the distribution of hospital procedure volume to contextualize the volume-outcome relationship. Materials and Methods We identified 140,671 men who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy from 2009 to 2011 in NIS (Nationwide Inpatient Sample). The associations of hospital volume with perioperative outcomes and total hospital costs were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear models. Results In 2011, 70% of hospitals averaged 1 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy per week or less, accounting for 28% of surgeries. Compared to patients treated at the lowest quartile hospitals, those treated at the highest quartile hospitals had significantly lower rates of intraoperative complications (0.6% vs 1.4%), postoperative complications (4.8% vs 13.9%), perioperative blood transfusion (1.5% vs 4.0%), prolonged hospitalization (4.3% vs 13.8%) and mean total hospital costs ($12,647 vs $15,394, all ptrend <0.001). When modeled as a nonlinear continuous variable, increasing hospital volume was independently associated with improved rates of each perioperative end point up to approximately 100 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies per year, beyond which there appeared to be marginal improvement. Conclusions Increasing hospital robot-assisted radical prostatectomy volume was associated with improved perioperative outcomes up to approximately 100 surgeries per year, beyond which there appeared to be marginal improvement. A substantial proportion of these procedures is performed at low volume hospitals.

AB - Purpose Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has undergone rapid dissemination driven in part by market forces to become the most frequently used surgical approach in the management of prostate cancer. Accordingly, a critical analysis of its volume-outcome relationship has important health policy implications. Therefore, we evaluated the association of hospital robot-assisted radical prostatectomy volume with perioperative outcomes, and examined the distribution of hospital procedure volume to contextualize the volume-outcome relationship. Materials and Methods We identified 140,671 men who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy from 2009 to 2011 in NIS (Nationwide Inpatient Sample). The associations of hospital volume with perioperative outcomes and total hospital costs were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear models. Results In 2011, 70% of hospitals averaged 1 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy per week or less, accounting for 28% of surgeries. Compared to patients treated at the lowest quartile hospitals, those treated at the highest quartile hospitals had significantly lower rates of intraoperative complications (0.6% vs 1.4%), postoperative complications (4.8% vs 13.9%), perioperative blood transfusion (1.5% vs 4.0%), prolonged hospitalization (4.3% vs 13.8%) and mean total hospital costs ($12,647 vs $15,394, all ptrend <0.001). When modeled as a nonlinear continuous variable, increasing hospital volume was independently associated with improved rates of each perioperative end point up to approximately 100 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies per year, beyond which there appeared to be marginal improvement. Conclusions Increasing hospital robot-assisted radical prostatectomy volume was associated with improved perioperative outcomes up to approximately 100 surgeries per year, beyond which there appeared to be marginal improvement. A substantial proportion of these procedures is performed at low volume hospitals.

KW - hospitals

KW - low-volume

KW - prostatectomy

KW - prostatic neoplasms

KW - robotics

KW - treatment outcome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019839263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019839263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.067

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.067

M3 - Article

VL - 198

SP - 92

EP - 99

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 1

ER -