Querying Patients With Cancer About Sexual Health and Sexual and Gender Minority Status: A Qualitative Study of Health-Care Providers

Elizabeth Cathcart-Rake, Jennifer M. O’Connor, Jennifer L. Ridgeway, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Lois J.Mc Guire, Eric A. Olson, Judith S. Kaur, Konstantinos Leventakos, Aminah Jatoi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Although national organizations advocate that health-care providers ask patients about sexual health and sexual and gender minority status—to learn, for example, about side effects of treatment and to understand patients’ social support—these conversations often do not occur. This study explored health-care providers’ reasons for having/not having these conversations. Methods: This single-institution study recruited health-care providers from medical oncology, hematology, radiation oncology, and gynecology. Face-to-face interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed qualitatively. Results: Three main themes emerged: (1) patient-centric reasons for discussing/not discussing sexual health and sexual and gender minority status (“So I think just the holistic viewpoint is important”); (2) health-care provider–centric reasons for discussing/not discussing these issues (“That’s going to take more time to talk about and to deal with…” or “I was raised orthodox, so this is not something we talk about…”; and (3) reasons that appeared to straddle both of the above themes (eg, acknowledgment of the sometimes taboo nature of these topics). Conclusion: Although many health-care providers favor talking with patients with cancer about sexual health and sexual and gender minority status, limited time, personal reluctance, and the taboo nature of these topics appear at times to hamper the initiation of these conversations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Reproductive Health
Health Personnel
Taboo
Neoplasms
Radiation Oncology
Medical Oncology
Hematology
Gynecology
Sexual Minorities
Organizations
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • cancer
  • gender
  • health-care provider
  • qualitative
  • sexual health
  • side effects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{4b3fb849e6214e2e8b0f16429fa76f6a,
title = "Querying Patients With Cancer About Sexual Health and Sexual and Gender Minority Status: A Qualitative Study of Health-Care Providers",
abstract = "Background: Although national organizations advocate that health-care providers ask patients about sexual health and sexual and gender minority status—to learn, for example, about side effects of treatment and to understand patients’ social support—these conversations often do not occur. This study explored health-care providers’ reasons for having/not having these conversations. Methods: This single-institution study recruited health-care providers from medical oncology, hematology, radiation oncology, and gynecology. Face-to-face interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed qualitatively. Results: Three main themes emerged: (1) patient-centric reasons for discussing/not discussing sexual health and sexual and gender minority status (“So I think just the holistic viewpoint is important”); (2) health-care provider–centric reasons for discussing/not discussing these issues (“That’s going to take more time to talk about and to deal with…” or “I was raised orthodox, so this is not something we talk about…”; and (3) reasons that appeared to straddle both of the above themes (eg, acknowledgment of the sometimes taboo nature of these topics). Conclusion: Although many health-care providers favor talking with patients with cancer about sexual health and sexual and gender minority status, limited time, personal reluctance, and the taboo nature of these topics appear at times to hamper the initiation of these conversations.",
keywords = "cancer, gender, health-care provider, qualitative, sexual health, side effects",
author = "Elizabeth Cathcart-Rake and O’Connor, {Jennifer M.} and Ridgeway, {Jennifer L.} and Breitkopf, {Carmen Radecki} and Guire, {Lois J.Mc} and Olson, {Eric A.} and Kaur, {Judith S.} and Konstantinos Leventakos and Aminah Jatoi",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1049909119879129",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1049-9091",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Querying Patients With Cancer About Sexual Health and Sexual and Gender Minority Status

T2 - A Qualitative Study of Health-Care Providers

AU - Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth

AU - O’Connor, Jennifer M.

AU - Ridgeway, Jennifer L.

AU - Breitkopf, Carmen Radecki

AU - Guire, Lois J.Mc

AU - Olson, Eric A.

AU - Kaur, Judith S.

AU - Leventakos, Konstantinos

AU - Jatoi, Aminah

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Although national organizations advocate that health-care providers ask patients about sexual health and sexual and gender minority status—to learn, for example, about side effects of treatment and to understand patients’ social support—these conversations often do not occur. This study explored health-care providers’ reasons for having/not having these conversations. Methods: This single-institution study recruited health-care providers from medical oncology, hematology, radiation oncology, and gynecology. Face-to-face interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed qualitatively. Results: Three main themes emerged: (1) patient-centric reasons for discussing/not discussing sexual health and sexual and gender minority status (“So I think just the holistic viewpoint is important”); (2) health-care provider–centric reasons for discussing/not discussing these issues (“That’s going to take more time to talk about and to deal with…” or “I was raised orthodox, so this is not something we talk about…”; and (3) reasons that appeared to straddle both of the above themes (eg, acknowledgment of the sometimes taboo nature of these topics). Conclusion: Although many health-care providers favor talking with patients with cancer about sexual health and sexual and gender minority status, limited time, personal reluctance, and the taboo nature of these topics appear at times to hamper the initiation of these conversations.

AB - Background: Although national organizations advocate that health-care providers ask patients about sexual health and sexual and gender minority status—to learn, for example, about side effects of treatment and to understand patients’ social support—these conversations often do not occur. This study explored health-care providers’ reasons for having/not having these conversations. Methods: This single-institution study recruited health-care providers from medical oncology, hematology, radiation oncology, and gynecology. Face-to-face interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed qualitatively. Results: Three main themes emerged: (1) patient-centric reasons for discussing/not discussing sexual health and sexual and gender minority status (“So I think just the holistic viewpoint is important”); (2) health-care provider–centric reasons for discussing/not discussing these issues (“That’s going to take more time to talk about and to deal with…” or “I was raised orthodox, so this is not something we talk about…”; and (3) reasons that appeared to straddle both of the above themes (eg, acknowledgment of the sometimes taboo nature of these topics). Conclusion: Although many health-care providers favor talking with patients with cancer about sexual health and sexual and gender minority status, limited time, personal reluctance, and the taboo nature of these topics appear at times to hamper the initiation of these conversations.

KW - cancer

KW - gender

KW - health-care provider

KW - qualitative

KW - sexual health

KW - side effects

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074109036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074109036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1049909119879129

DO - 10.1177/1049909119879129

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074109036

JO - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine

JF - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine

SN - 1049-9091

ER -