Quality in EUS: an assessment of baseline compliance and performance improvement by using the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-American College of Gastroenterology quality indicators

Susan G. Coe, Massimo Raimondo, Timothy A. Woodward, Seth A. Gross, Kanwar Rupinder S Gill, Laith H. Jamil, Mohammad Al-Haddad, Michael G. Heckman, Juliana Crook, Nancy N. Diehl, Michael B. Wallace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: An American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-American College of Gastroenterology (ASGE-ACG) task force recently developed quality indicators for the preprocedure, intraprocedure, and postprocedure phases of each endoscopic procedure. Benchmark rates and clinical significance of compliance have not been determined. Objectives: To establish baseline compliance rates to the preprocedure and intraprocedure quality indicators in our EUS cases, identify indicators with the lowest compliance rates, and establish change in compliance rates with a targeted performance improvement plan. Methods: We measured baseline compliance to each of the preprocedure and intraprocedure EUS quality indicators in the EUS procedures performed at Mayo Clinic Jacksonville from March 1996 through August 2006. We developed a performance improvement plan that targeted the 4 indicators with the lowest compliance over the entire time period. Compliance rates in the year after plan implementation were compared with those from January 2004 to August 2006, when adjusting for endoscopist and direct access. Results: We demonstrated areas of high quality as well as areas for improvement in compliance with the ASGE-ACG quality metrics in a large cohort of EUS cases. We achieved improvement in all 4 areas targeted for quality improvement, statistically significant at the 5% level for two of the quality indicators. Limitations: Limitations included our retrospective design and the use of unstructured procedure dictations that may limit application of our results. It is also unclear whether compliance was truly synonymous with performance. Conclusions: We established reference levels of compliance rate within our practice and showed that a targeted performance improvement plan that consisted of awareness, individual accountability, and documentation can result in improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-201
Number of pages7
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume69
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Compliance
Benchmarking
Social Responsibility
Gastroenterology
Advisory Committees
Quality Improvement
Documentation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Quality in EUS : an assessment of baseline compliance and performance improvement by using the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-American College of Gastroenterology quality indicators. / Coe, Susan G.; Raimondo, Massimo; Woodward, Timothy A.; Gross, Seth A.; Gill, Kanwar Rupinder S; Jamil, Laith H.; Al-Haddad, Mohammad; Heckman, Michael G.; Crook, Juliana; Diehl, Nancy N.; Wallace, Michael B.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 69, No. 2, 02.2009, p. 195-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coe, Susan G. ; Raimondo, Massimo ; Woodward, Timothy A. ; Gross, Seth A. ; Gill, Kanwar Rupinder S ; Jamil, Laith H. ; Al-Haddad, Mohammad ; Heckman, Michael G. ; Crook, Juliana ; Diehl, Nancy N. ; Wallace, Michael B. / Quality in EUS : an assessment of baseline compliance and performance improvement by using the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-American College of Gastroenterology quality indicators. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2009 ; Vol. 69, No. 2. pp. 195-201.
@article{2842ebaf714a4a59b313a0f7499c233c,
title = "Quality in EUS: an assessment of baseline compliance and performance improvement by using the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-American College of Gastroenterology quality indicators",
abstract = "Background: An American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-American College of Gastroenterology (ASGE-ACG) task force recently developed quality indicators for the preprocedure, intraprocedure, and postprocedure phases of each endoscopic procedure. Benchmark rates and clinical significance of compliance have not been determined. Objectives: To establish baseline compliance rates to the preprocedure and intraprocedure quality indicators in our EUS cases, identify indicators with the lowest compliance rates, and establish change in compliance rates with a targeted performance improvement plan. Methods: We measured baseline compliance to each of the preprocedure and intraprocedure EUS quality indicators in the EUS procedures performed at Mayo Clinic Jacksonville from March 1996 through August 2006. We developed a performance improvement plan that targeted the 4 indicators with the lowest compliance over the entire time period. Compliance rates in the year after plan implementation were compared with those from January 2004 to August 2006, when adjusting for endoscopist and direct access. Results: We demonstrated areas of high quality as well as areas for improvement in compliance with the ASGE-ACG quality metrics in a large cohort of EUS cases. We achieved improvement in all 4 areas targeted for quality improvement, statistically significant at the 5{\%} level for two of the quality indicators. Limitations: Limitations included our retrospective design and the use of unstructured procedure dictations that may limit application of our results. It is also unclear whether compliance was truly synonymous with performance. Conclusions: We established reference levels of compliance rate within our practice and showed that a targeted performance improvement plan that consisted of awareness, individual accountability, and documentation can result in improvement.",
author = "Coe, {Susan G.} and Massimo Raimondo and Woodward, {Timothy A.} and Gross, {Seth A.} and Gill, {Kanwar Rupinder S} and Jamil, {Laith H.} and Mohammad Al-Haddad and Heckman, {Michael G.} and Juliana Crook and Diehl, {Nancy N.} and Wallace, {Michael B.}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "195--201",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality in EUS

T2 - an assessment of baseline compliance and performance improvement by using the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-American College of Gastroenterology quality indicators

AU - Coe, Susan G.

AU - Raimondo, Massimo

AU - Woodward, Timothy A.

AU - Gross, Seth A.

AU - Gill, Kanwar Rupinder S

AU - Jamil, Laith H.

AU - Al-Haddad, Mohammad

AU - Heckman, Michael G.

AU - Crook, Juliana

AU - Diehl, Nancy N.

AU - Wallace, Michael B.

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - Background: An American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-American College of Gastroenterology (ASGE-ACG) task force recently developed quality indicators for the preprocedure, intraprocedure, and postprocedure phases of each endoscopic procedure. Benchmark rates and clinical significance of compliance have not been determined. Objectives: To establish baseline compliance rates to the preprocedure and intraprocedure quality indicators in our EUS cases, identify indicators with the lowest compliance rates, and establish change in compliance rates with a targeted performance improvement plan. Methods: We measured baseline compliance to each of the preprocedure and intraprocedure EUS quality indicators in the EUS procedures performed at Mayo Clinic Jacksonville from March 1996 through August 2006. We developed a performance improvement plan that targeted the 4 indicators with the lowest compliance over the entire time period. Compliance rates in the year after plan implementation were compared with those from January 2004 to August 2006, when adjusting for endoscopist and direct access. Results: We demonstrated areas of high quality as well as areas for improvement in compliance with the ASGE-ACG quality metrics in a large cohort of EUS cases. We achieved improvement in all 4 areas targeted for quality improvement, statistically significant at the 5% level for two of the quality indicators. Limitations: Limitations included our retrospective design and the use of unstructured procedure dictations that may limit application of our results. It is also unclear whether compliance was truly synonymous with performance. Conclusions: We established reference levels of compliance rate within our practice and showed that a targeted performance improvement plan that consisted of awareness, individual accountability, and documentation can result in improvement.

AB - Background: An American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-American College of Gastroenterology (ASGE-ACG) task force recently developed quality indicators for the preprocedure, intraprocedure, and postprocedure phases of each endoscopic procedure. Benchmark rates and clinical significance of compliance have not been determined. Objectives: To establish baseline compliance rates to the preprocedure and intraprocedure quality indicators in our EUS cases, identify indicators with the lowest compliance rates, and establish change in compliance rates with a targeted performance improvement plan. Methods: We measured baseline compliance to each of the preprocedure and intraprocedure EUS quality indicators in the EUS procedures performed at Mayo Clinic Jacksonville from March 1996 through August 2006. We developed a performance improvement plan that targeted the 4 indicators with the lowest compliance over the entire time period. Compliance rates in the year after plan implementation were compared with those from January 2004 to August 2006, when adjusting for endoscopist and direct access. Results: We demonstrated areas of high quality as well as areas for improvement in compliance with the ASGE-ACG quality metrics in a large cohort of EUS cases. We achieved improvement in all 4 areas targeted for quality improvement, statistically significant at the 5% level for two of the quality indicators. Limitations: Limitations included our retrospective design and the use of unstructured procedure dictations that may limit application of our results. It is also unclear whether compliance was truly synonymous with performance. Conclusions: We established reference levels of compliance rate within our practice and showed that a targeted performance improvement plan that consisted of awareness, individual accountability, and documentation can result in improvement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58649100057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58649100057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.032

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.032

M3 - Article

C2 - 19185684

AN - SCOPUS:58649100057

VL - 69

SP - 195

EP - 201

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 2

ER -