TY - JOUR
T1 - Pulmonary and peritoneal inflammatory findings in transgastric NOTES compared with laparoscopy
T2 - Pooled analysis from randomized porcine survival studies
AU - Moran, Erica
AU - Hanes, Martha
AU - Huebner, Marianne
AU - Gostout, Christopher J.
AU - Bingener, Juliane
PY - 2011/11
Y1 - 2011/11
N2 - Background: Laparoscopy, which is a minimally invasive surgery, is associated with decreased peritoneal adhesions and inflammatory response compared with laparotomy. Objective: To evaluate whether natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) leads to an attenuated peritoneal response compared with laparoscopy. Design: Pooled histologic analysis from 2 randomized porcine trials. Setting: Laboratory. Intervention: Histologic analysis of swine undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy, diagnostic NOTES peritoneoscopy, NOTES with transgastric mesh placement, or diagnostic endoscopy (no gastrotomy) followed by laparoscopic mesh placement. Main Outcome Measurements: The presence and grade of inflammation in necropsy specimens of lung, liver, and spleen as reviewed by a blinded veterinary pathologist. Results: Four NOTES mesh animals exhibited mesh infections at necropsy. Tissue from 48 swine were available for analysis. Pulmonary inflammation, liver fibrosis, and spleen capsulitis were the primary findings. No difference was seen in the incidence of each finding among groups. The severity of the pulmonary inflammation in the laparoscopy group was significantly higher than in the NOTES groups. The NOTES mesh group exhibited significantly more severe liver fibrosis and spleen capsulitis. There was no difference between clinical behavior, serum white blood cell count, or peritoneal white blood cell count among groups in either study. Intra-abdominal pressures during NOTES were lower than during laparoscopy. Limitations: Pooled analysis of 2 separate studies. Conclusion: More severe pulmonary inflammation was found in animals undergoing longer laparoscopic procedures with higher intra-abdominal pressures. Intraperitoneal inflammation was most significant with transgastric mesh placement, likely caused by infections.
AB - Background: Laparoscopy, which is a minimally invasive surgery, is associated with decreased peritoneal adhesions and inflammatory response compared with laparotomy. Objective: To evaluate whether natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) leads to an attenuated peritoneal response compared with laparoscopy. Design: Pooled histologic analysis from 2 randomized porcine trials. Setting: Laboratory. Intervention: Histologic analysis of swine undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy, diagnostic NOTES peritoneoscopy, NOTES with transgastric mesh placement, or diagnostic endoscopy (no gastrotomy) followed by laparoscopic mesh placement. Main Outcome Measurements: The presence and grade of inflammation in necropsy specimens of lung, liver, and spleen as reviewed by a blinded veterinary pathologist. Results: Four NOTES mesh animals exhibited mesh infections at necropsy. Tissue from 48 swine were available for analysis. Pulmonary inflammation, liver fibrosis, and spleen capsulitis were the primary findings. No difference was seen in the incidence of each finding among groups. The severity of the pulmonary inflammation in the laparoscopy group was significantly higher than in the NOTES groups. The NOTES mesh group exhibited significantly more severe liver fibrosis and spleen capsulitis. There was no difference between clinical behavior, serum white blood cell count, or peritoneal white blood cell count among groups in either study. Intra-abdominal pressures during NOTES were lower than during laparoscopy. Limitations: Pooled analysis of 2 separate studies. Conclusion: More severe pulmonary inflammation was found in animals undergoing longer laparoscopic procedures with higher intra-abdominal pressures. Intraperitoneal inflammation was most significant with transgastric mesh placement, likely caused by infections.
KW - NOTES
KW - natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054968143&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054968143&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.031
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.031
M3 - Article
C2 - 21890136
AN - SCOPUS:80054968143
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 74
SP - 1103
EP - 1107
JO - Gastrointestinal endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal endoscopy
IS - 5
ER -