Proceedings from the ice hockey summit on concussion: A call to action

A. Smith, M. Stuart, R. Greenwald, B. Benson, David William Dodick, C. Emery, J. Finnoff, J. Mihalik, W. Roberts, C. A. Sullivan, W. Meeuwisse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this proceedings is to integrate the concussion in sport literature and sport science research on safety in ice hockey to develop an action plan to reduce the risk, incidence, severity, and consequences of concussion in ice hockey. A rationale paper outlining a collaborative action plan to address concussions in hockey was posted for review two months prior to the Ice Hockey Summit: Action on Concussion. Focused presentations devoted specifically to concussion in ice hockey were presented during the Summit and breakout sessions were used to develop strategies to reduce concussion in the sport. This proceedings and a detailed scientific review (a matrix of solutions) were written to disseminate the evidence-based information and resulting concussion reduction strategies. The manuscripts were reviewed by the authors, advisors and contributors to ensure that the opinions and recommendations reflect the current level of knowledge on concussion in hockey. Six components of a potential solution were articulated in the Rationale paper and became the topics for breakout groups that followed the professional, scientific lectures. Topics that formed the core of the action plan were: metrics and databases; recognizing, managing and return to play; hockey equipment and ice arenas; prevention and education; rules and regulations; and expedient communication of the outcomes. The attendees in breakout sessions identified action items for each section. The most highly ranked action items were brought to a vote in the open assembly, using an Audience Response System (ARS). The strategic planning process was conducted to assess: Where are we at?; Where must we get to?; and What strategies are necessary to make progress on the prioritized action items? Three prioritized action items for each component of the solution and the percentage of the votes received are listed in the body of this proceedings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)689-701
Number of pages13
JournalClinical Neuropsychologist
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Hockey
Sports
Manuscripts
Proceedings
Databases
Safety
Education
Equipment and Supplies
Incidence
Research

Keywords

  • Concussion
  • Hockey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Smith, A., Stuart, M., Greenwald, R., Benson, B., Dodick, D. W., Emery, C., ... Meeuwisse, W. (2011). Proceedings from the ice hockey summit on concussion: A call to action. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(5), 689-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2011.586561

Proceedings from the ice hockey summit on concussion : A call to action. / Smith, A.; Stuart, M.; Greenwald, R.; Benson, B.; Dodick, David William; Emery, C.; Finnoff, J.; Mihalik, J.; Roberts, W.; Sullivan, C. A.; Meeuwisse, W.

In: Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 25, No. 5, 07.2011, p. 689-701.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, A, Stuart, M, Greenwald, R, Benson, B, Dodick, DW, Emery, C, Finnoff, J, Mihalik, J, Roberts, W, Sullivan, CA & Meeuwisse, W 2011, 'Proceedings from the ice hockey summit on concussion: A call to action', Clinical Neuropsychologist, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 689-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2011.586561
Smith, A. ; Stuart, M. ; Greenwald, R. ; Benson, B. ; Dodick, David William ; Emery, C. ; Finnoff, J. ; Mihalik, J. ; Roberts, W. ; Sullivan, C. A. ; Meeuwisse, W. / Proceedings from the ice hockey summit on concussion : A call to action. In: Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2011 ; Vol. 25, No. 5. pp. 689-701.
@article{f51bc2b64973435d9e63c82858c8bba1,
title = "Proceedings from the ice hockey summit on concussion: A call to action",
abstract = "The objective of this proceedings is to integrate the concussion in sport literature and sport science research on safety in ice hockey to develop an action plan to reduce the risk, incidence, severity, and consequences of concussion in ice hockey. A rationale paper outlining a collaborative action plan to address concussions in hockey was posted for review two months prior to the Ice Hockey Summit: Action on Concussion. Focused presentations devoted specifically to concussion in ice hockey were presented during the Summit and breakout sessions were used to develop strategies to reduce concussion in the sport. This proceedings and a detailed scientific review (a matrix of solutions) were written to disseminate the evidence-based information and resulting concussion reduction strategies. The manuscripts were reviewed by the authors, advisors and contributors to ensure that the opinions and recommendations reflect the current level of knowledge on concussion in hockey. Six components of a potential solution were articulated in the Rationale paper and became the topics for breakout groups that followed the professional, scientific lectures. Topics that formed the core of the action plan were: metrics and databases; recognizing, managing and return to play; hockey equipment and ice arenas; prevention and education; rules and regulations; and expedient communication of the outcomes. The attendees in breakout sessions identified action items for each section. The most highly ranked action items were brought to a vote in the open assembly, using an Audience Response System (ARS). The strategic planning process was conducted to assess: Where are we at?; Where must we get to?; and What strategies are necessary to make progress on the prioritized action items? Three prioritized action items for each component of the solution and the percentage of the votes received are listed in the body of this proceedings.",
keywords = "Concussion, Hockey",
author = "A. Smith and M. Stuart and R. Greenwald and B. Benson and Dodick, {David William} and C. Emery and J. Finnoff and J. Mihalik and W. Roberts and Sullivan, {C. A.} and W. Meeuwisse",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/13854046.2011.586561",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "689--701",
journal = "The Clinical neuropsychologist",
issn = "1385-4046",
publisher = "Swets & Zeitlinger",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proceedings from the ice hockey summit on concussion

T2 - A call to action

AU - Smith, A.

AU - Stuart, M.

AU - Greenwald, R.

AU - Benson, B.

AU - Dodick, David William

AU - Emery, C.

AU - Finnoff, J.

AU - Mihalik, J.

AU - Roberts, W.

AU - Sullivan, C. A.

AU - Meeuwisse, W.

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - The objective of this proceedings is to integrate the concussion in sport literature and sport science research on safety in ice hockey to develop an action plan to reduce the risk, incidence, severity, and consequences of concussion in ice hockey. A rationale paper outlining a collaborative action plan to address concussions in hockey was posted for review two months prior to the Ice Hockey Summit: Action on Concussion. Focused presentations devoted specifically to concussion in ice hockey were presented during the Summit and breakout sessions were used to develop strategies to reduce concussion in the sport. This proceedings and a detailed scientific review (a matrix of solutions) were written to disseminate the evidence-based information and resulting concussion reduction strategies. The manuscripts were reviewed by the authors, advisors and contributors to ensure that the opinions and recommendations reflect the current level of knowledge on concussion in hockey. Six components of a potential solution were articulated in the Rationale paper and became the topics for breakout groups that followed the professional, scientific lectures. Topics that formed the core of the action plan were: metrics and databases; recognizing, managing and return to play; hockey equipment and ice arenas; prevention and education; rules and regulations; and expedient communication of the outcomes. The attendees in breakout sessions identified action items for each section. The most highly ranked action items were brought to a vote in the open assembly, using an Audience Response System (ARS). The strategic planning process was conducted to assess: Where are we at?; Where must we get to?; and What strategies are necessary to make progress on the prioritized action items? Three prioritized action items for each component of the solution and the percentage of the votes received are listed in the body of this proceedings.

AB - The objective of this proceedings is to integrate the concussion in sport literature and sport science research on safety in ice hockey to develop an action plan to reduce the risk, incidence, severity, and consequences of concussion in ice hockey. A rationale paper outlining a collaborative action plan to address concussions in hockey was posted for review two months prior to the Ice Hockey Summit: Action on Concussion. Focused presentations devoted specifically to concussion in ice hockey were presented during the Summit and breakout sessions were used to develop strategies to reduce concussion in the sport. This proceedings and a detailed scientific review (a matrix of solutions) were written to disseminate the evidence-based information and resulting concussion reduction strategies. The manuscripts were reviewed by the authors, advisors and contributors to ensure that the opinions and recommendations reflect the current level of knowledge on concussion in hockey. Six components of a potential solution were articulated in the Rationale paper and became the topics for breakout groups that followed the professional, scientific lectures. Topics that formed the core of the action plan were: metrics and databases; recognizing, managing and return to play; hockey equipment and ice arenas; prevention and education; rules and regulations; and expedient communication of the outcomes. The attendees in breakout sessions identified action items for each section. The most highly ranked action items were brought to a vote in the open assembly, using an Audience Response System (ARS). The strategic planning process was conducted to assess: Where are we at?; Where must we get to?; and What strategies are necessary to make progress on the prioritized action items? Three prioritized action items for each component of the solution and the percentage of the votes received are listed in the body of this proceedings.

KW - Concussion

KW - Hockey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960664780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960664780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13854046.2011.586561

DO - 10.1080/13854046.2011.586561

M3 - Article

C2 - 21756209

AN - SCOPUS:79960664780

VL - 25

SP - 689

EP - 701

JO - The Clinical neuropsychologist

JF - The Clinical neuropsychologist

SN - 1385-4046

IS - 5

ER -