Power of a simplified multivariate test for genetic linkage

O. Y. Gorlova, C. I. Amos, D. K. Zhu, W. Wang, Stephen T Turner, E. Boerwinkle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we compare the power of the multivariate Haseman-Elston (MHE) test proposed earlier by Amos et al. (1990) and a computationally rapid new version of the multivariate Haseman-Elston test (NMHE) (Elston et al. 2000). We show that the power of NMHE was, for different simulation setups, identical or higher than that of MHE. In the bivariate case, the power of the NMHE method was somewhat less than that of the computationally intensive maximum likelihood variance components method (Amos et al. 2001). We present comparisons of the empirical distributions of the NMHE test to its limiting distributions for a range of numbers of traits. The distribution of the NMHE test appeared to conform satisfactorily to its limiting asymptotic distribution in large samples. Otherwise, empirical critical values for NMHE are somewhat higher than predicted, i.e. the test proposed by Elston et al. (2000) is non-conservative. The use of empirical critical values is therefore recommended for limited sample sizes (less than several hundred families). We also present the results of a linkage analysis performed by the NMHE method on a set of 4 body size-related traits. The method identified meaningful combinations of traits that showed significant linkage on chromosome 2 and suggestive linkage to regions on chromosomes 16 and 17.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-417
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Human Genetics
Volume66
Issue number5-6
StatePublished - Nov 2002

Fingerprint

Genetic Linkage
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2
Body Size
Sample Size

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Genetics

Cite this

Gorlova, O. Y., Amos, C. I., Zhu, D. K., Wang, W., Turner, S. T., & Boerwinkle, E. (2002). Power of a simplified multivariate test for genetic linkage. Annals of Human Genetics, 66(5-6), 407-417.

Power of a simplified multivariate test for genetic linkage. / Gorlova, O. Y.; Amos, C. I.; Zhu, D. K.; Wang, W.; Turner, Stephen T; Boerwinkle, E.

In: Annals of Human Genetics, Vol. 66, No. 5-6, 11.2002, p. 407-417.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gorlova, OY, Amos, CI, Zhu, DK, Wang, W, Turner, ST & Boerwinkle, E 2002, 'Power of a simplified multivariate test for genetic linkage', Annals of Human Genetics, vol. 66, no. 5-6, pp. 407-417.
Gorlova OY, Amos CI, Zhu DK, Wang W, Turner ST, Boerwinkle E. Power of a simplified multivariate test for genetic linkage. Annals of Human Genetics. 2002 Nov;66(5-6):407-417.
Gorlova, O. Y. ; Amos, C. I. ; Zhu, D. K. ; Wang, W. ; Turner, Stephen T ; Boerwinkle, E. / Power of a simplified multivariate test for genetic linkage. In: Annals of Human Genetics. 2002 ; Vol. 66, No. 5-6. pp. 407-417.
@article{b12fd0001cb6466f8ecca01174ab658d,
title = "Power of a simplified multivariate test for genetic linkage",
abstract = "In this paper we compare the power of the multivariate Haseman-Elston (MHE) test proposed earlier by Amos et al. (1990) and a computationally rapid new version of the multivariate Haseman-Elston test (NMHE) (Elston et al. 2000). We show that the power of NMHE was, for different simulation setups, identical or higher than that of MHE. In the bivariate case, the power of the NMHE method was somewhat less than that of the computationally intensive maximum likelihood variance components method (Amos et al. 2001). We present comparisons of the empirical distributions of the NMHE test to its limiting distributions for a range of numbers of traits. The distribution of the NMHE test appeared to conform satisfactorily to its limiting asymptotic distribution in large samples. Otherwise, empirical critical values for NMHE are somewhat higher than predicted, i.e. the test proposed by Elston et al. (2000) is non-conservative. The use of empirical critical values is therefore recommended for limited sample sizes (less than several hundred families). We also present the results of a linkage analysis performed by the NMHE method on a set of 4 body size-related traits. The method identified meaningful combinations of traits that showed significant linkage on chromosome 2 and suggestive linkage to regions on chromosomes 16 and 17.",
author = "Gorlova, {O. Y.} and Amos, {C. I.} and Zhu, {D. K.} and W. Wang and Turner, {Stephen T} and E. Boerwinkle",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "407--417",
journal = "Annals of Human Genetics",
issn = "0003-4800",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5-6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power of a simplified multivariate test for genetic linkage

AU - Gorlova, O. Y.

AU - Amos, C. I.

AU - Zhu, D. K.

AU - Wang, W.

AU - Turner, Stephen T

AU - Boerwinkle, E.

PY - 2002/11

Y1 - 2002/11

N2 - In this paper we compare the power of the multivariate Haseman-Elston (MHE) test proposed earlier by Amos et al. (1990) and a computationally rapid new version of the multivariate Haseman-Elston test (NMHE) (Elston et al. 2000). We show that the power of NMHE was, for different simulation setups, identical or higher than that of MHE. In the bivariate case, the power of the NMHE method was somewhat less than that of the computationally intensive maximum likelihood variance components method (Amos et al. 2001). We present comparisons of the empirical distributions of the NMHE test to its limiting distributions for a range of numbers of traits. The distribution of the NMHE test appeared to conform satisfactorily to its limiting asymptotic distribution in large samples. Otherwise, empirical critical values for NMHE are somewhat higher than predicted, i.e. the test proposed by Elston et al. (2000) is non-conservative. The use of empirical critical values is therefore recommended for limited sample sizes (less than several hundred families). We also present the results of a linkage analysis performed by the NMHE method on a set of 4 body size-related traits. The method identified meaningful combinations of traits that showed significant linkage on chromosome 2 and suggestive linkage to regions on chromosomes 16 and 17.

AB - In this paper we compare the power of the multivariate Haseman-Elston (MHE) test proposed earlier by Amos et al. (1990) and a computationally rapid new version of the multivariate Haseman-Elston test (NMHE) (Elston et al. 2000). We show that the power of NMHE was, for different simulation setups, identical or higher than that of MHE. In the bivariate case, the power of the NMHE method was somewhat less than that of the computationally intensive maximum likelihood variance components method (Amos et al. 2001). We present comparisons of the empirical distributions of the NMHE test to its limiting distributions for a range of numbers of traits. The distribution of the NMHE test appeared to conform satisfactorily to its limiting asymptotic distribution in large samples. Otherwise, empirical critical values for NMHE are somewhat higher than predicted, i.e. the test proposed by Elston et al. (2000) is non-conservative. The use of empirical critical values is therefore recommended for limited sample sizes (less than several hundred families). We also present the results of a linkage analysis performed by the NMHE method on a set of 4 body size-related traits. The method identified meaningful combinations of traits that showed significant linkage on chromosome 2 and suggestive linkage to regions on chromosomes 16 and 17.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036866578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036866578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 407

EP - 417

JO - Annals of Human Genetics

JF - Annals of Human Genetics

SN - 0003-4800

IS - 5-6

ER -