Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy

Mark Sheehan, Claire Timlin, Ken Peach, Ariella Binik, Wilson Puthenparampil, Mark Lodge, Sean Kehoe, Michael Brada, Neil Burnet, Steve Clarke, Adrian Crellin, Michael Dunn, Piero Fossati, Steve Harris, Michael Hocken, Tony Hope, Jonathan Ives, Tadashi Kamada, Alex John London, Robert MillerMichael Parker, Madelon Pijls-Johannesma, Julian Savulescu, Susan Short, Loane Skene, Hirohiko Tsujii, Jeffrey Tuan, Charles Weijer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of charged-particle radiation therapy (CPRT) is an increasingly important development in the treatment of cancer. One of the most pressing controversies about the use of this technology is whether randomised controlled trials are required before this form of treatment can be considered to be the treatment of choice for a wide range of indications. Equipoise is the key ethical concept in determining which research studies are justied. However, there is a good deal of disagreement about how this concept is best understood and applied in the specic case of CPRT. This report is a position statement on these controversies that arises out of a workshop held at Wolfson College, Oxford in August 2011. The workshop brought together international leaders in the relevant elds (radiation oncology, medical physics, radiobiology, research ethics and methodology), including proponents on both sides of the debate, in order to make signicant progress on the ethical issues associated with CPRT research. This position statement provides an ethical platform for future research and should enable further work to be done in developing international coordinated programmes of research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)572-575
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume40
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Research Ethics
Radiotherapy
moral philosophy
therapy research
research ethics
Research
Radiobiology
physics
Education
indication
Radiation Oncology
cancer
Physics
leader
Ethics
methodology
Research Design
Therapeutics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Sheehan, M., Timlin, C., Peach, K., Binik, A., Puthenparampil, W., Lodge, M., ... Weijer, C. (2014). Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(8), 572-575. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101290

Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy. / Sheehan, Mark; Timlin, Claire; Peach, Ken; Binik, Ariella; Puthenparampil, Wilson; Lodge, Mark; Kehoe, Sean; Brada, Michael; Burnet, Neil; Clarke, Steve; Crellin, Adrian; Dunn, Michael; Fossati, Piero; Harris, Steve; Hocken, Michael; Hope, Tony; Ives, Jonathan; Kamada, Tadashi; London, Alex John; Miller, Robert; Parker, Michael; Pijls-Johannesma, Madelon; Savulescu, Julian; Short, Susan; Skene, Loane; Tsujii, Hirohiko; Tuan, Jeffrey; Weijer, Charles.

In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 40, No. 8, 2014, p. 572-575.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sheehan, M, Timlin, C, Peach, K, Binik, A, Puthenparampil, W, Lodge, M, Kehoe, S, Brada, M, Burnet, N, Clarke, S, Crellin, A, Dunn, M, Fossati, P, Harris, S, Hocken, M, Hope, T, Ives, J, Kamada, T, London, AJ, Miller, R, Parker, M, Pijls-Johannesma, M, Savulescu, J, Short, S, Skene, L, Tsujii, H, Tuan, J & Weijer, C 2014, 'Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy', Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 572-575. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101290
Sheehan, Mark ; Timlin, Claire ; Peach, Ken ; Binik, Ariella ; Puthenparampil, Wilson ; Lodge, Mark ; Kehoe, Sean ; Brada, Michael ; Burnet, Neil ; Clarke, Steve ; Crellin, Adrian ; Dunn, Michael ; Fossati, Piero ; Harris, Steve ; Hocken, Michael ; Hope, Tony ; Ives, Jonathan ; Kamada, Tadashi ; London, Alex John ; Miller, Robert ; Parker, Michael ; Pijls-Johannesma, Madelon ; Savulescu, Julian ; Short, Susan ; Skene, Loane ; Tsujii, Hirohiko ; Tuan, Jeffrey ; Weijer, Charles. / Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy. In: Journal of Medical Ethics. 2014 ; Vol. 40, No. 8. pp. 572-575.
@article{f86f6e715b9b4237a8d9a1f4a666b0ae,
title = "Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy",
abstract = "The use of charged-particle radiation therapy (CPRT) is an increasingly important development in the treatment of cancer. One of the most pressing controversies about the use of this technology is whether randomised controlled trials are required before this form of treatment can be considered to be the treatment of choice for a wide range of indications. Equipoise is the key ethical concept in determining which research studies are justied. However, there is a good deal of disagreement about how this concept is best understood and applied in the specic case of CPRT. This report is a position statement on these controversies that arises out of a workshop held at Wolfson College, Oxford in August 2011. The workshop brought together international leaders in the relevant elds (radiation oncology, medical physics, radiobiology, research ethics and methodology), including proponents on both sides of the debate, in order to make signicant progress on the ethical issues associated with CPRT research. This position statement provides an ethical platform for future research and should enable further work to be done in developing international coordinated programmes of research.",
author = "Mark Sheehan and Claire Timlin and Ken Peach and Ariella Binik and Wilson Puthenparampil and Mark Lodge and Sean Kehoe and Michael Brada and Neil Burnet and Steve Clarke and Adrian Crellin and Michael Dunn and Piero Fossati and Steve Harris and Michael Hocken and Tony Hope and Jonathan Ives and Tadashi Kamada and London, {Alex John} and Robert Miller and Michael Parker and Madelon Pijls-Johannesma and Julian Savulescu and Susan Short and Loane Skene and Hirohiko Tsujii and Jeffrey Tuan and Charles Weijer",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1136/medethics-2012-101290",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "572--575",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy

AU - Sheehan, Mark

AU - Timlin, Claire

AU - Peach, Ken

AU - Binik, Ariella

AU - Puthenparampil, Wilson

AU - Lodge, Mark

AU - Kehoe, Sean

AU - Brada, Michael

AU - Burnet, Neil

AU - Clarke, Steve

AU - Crellin, Adrian

AU - Dunn, Michael

AU - Fossati, Piero

AU - Harris, Steve

AU - Hocken, Michael

AU - Hope, Tony

AU - Ives, Jonathan

AU - Kamada, Tadashi

AU - London, Alex John

AU - Miller, Robert

AU - Parker, Michael

AU - Pijls-Johannesma, Madelon

AU - Savulescu, Julian

AU - Short, Susan

AU - Skene, Loane

AU - Tsujii, Hirohiko

AU - Tuan, Jeffrey

AU - Weijer, Charles

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The use of charged-particle radiation therapy (CPRT) is an increasingly important development in the treatment of cancer. One of the most pressing controversies about the use of this technology is whether randomised controlled trials are required before this form of treatment can be considered to be the treatment of choice for a wide range of indications. Equipoise is the key ethical concept in determining which research studies are justied. However, there is a good deal of disagreement about how this concept is best understood and applied in the specic case of CPRT. This report is a position statement on these controversies that arises out of a workshop held at Wolfson College, Oxford in August 2011. The workshop brought together international leaders in the relevant elds (radiation oncology, medical physics, radiobiology, research ethics and methodology), including proponents on both sides of the debate, in order to make signicant progress on the ethical issues associated with CPRT research. This position statement provides an ethical platform for future research and should enable further work to be done in developing international coordinated programmes of research.

AB - The use of charged-particle radiation therapy (CPRT) is an increasingly important development in the treatment of cancer. One of the most pressing controversies about the use of this technology is whether randomised controlled trials are required before this form of treatment can be considered to be the treatment of choice for a wide range of indications. Equipoise is the key ethical concept in determining which research studies are justied. However, there is a good deal of disagreement about how this concept is best understood and applied in the specic case of CPRT. This report is a position statement on these controversies that arises out of a workshop held at Wolfson College, Oxford in August 2011. The workshop brought together international leaders in the relevant elds (radiation oncology, medical physics, radiobiology, research ethics and methodology), including proponents on both sides of the debate, in order to make signicant progress on the ethical issues associated with CPRT research. This position statement provides an ethical platform for future research and should enable further work to be done in developing international coordinated programmes of research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904747517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904747517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/medethics-2012-101290

DO - 10.1136/medethics-2012-101290

M3 - Article

C2 - 24045770

AN - SCOPUS:84904747517

VL - 40

SP - 572

EP - 575

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 8

ER -