Periarticular raft constructs and fracture stability in split-depression tibial plateau fractures

William W. Cross, Bruce A. Levy, Joseph A. Morgan, Bryan M. Armitage, Peter A. Cole

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate relative fracture stability yielded by screws placed above a lateral plate, as well as locking and non-locking screws placed through a plate in a split depression tibia plateau fracture model. Methods: Cadaver tibia specimens (mean age 74.1 years) were randomised across 3 groups: Groups 1: raft-construct outside the plate, 2: non-locking raft screws through the plate, and 3: locking raft screws through the plate. Displacement of the depressed fragment was recorded with force values from 400 N to 1600 N in increasing 400 N increments. The force required to elicit lateral plateau fragment displacement of 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm was also recorded. Results: None of the mechanical testing results demonstrated statistical significance with p-values of <0.05. Cyclic testing of Groups 1, 2, and 3 at 400 N revealed displacements of 0.54 mm, 0.64 mm, and 0.48 mm, respectively. At 800 N, displacements were 1.36 mm, 1.4 mm, and 1.4 mm, respectively. At 1200 N, displacements were 2.4 mm, 1.9 mm, and 2.1 mm, respectively. At 1600 N, displacements were 2.8 mm, 2.5 mm, and 2 mm, respectively. Resistance to displacement data demonstrated the mean force required to displace the fracture 5 mm in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 250 N, 330 N, and 318 N, respectively. For 10 mm of displacement, forces required were 394 N, 515 N, and 556 N, respectively. For 15 mm of displacement, forces required were 681 N, 853 N, and 963 N, respectively. Compared to combined groups using screws through the plate, Group 1 demonstrated lower displacement ≤800 N, but demonstrated greater displacement >800 N. Group 2 demonstrated greatest resistance to plateau displacement of 5 mm compared to Group 1 or 3, while Group 3 was most resistant to greater displacement. The combined group using screws through the plate (Groups 2 + 3) was consistently more resistant than Group 1 at all levels of displacement. Conclusions: Designs utilising screws through the plate trended towards statistically significant improved stability against plateau displacement relative to utilising screws outside the plate. Our study also suggests that there is no significant benefit of locking screws over non-locking screws in this unicondylar tibia plateau fracture model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)796-801
Number of pages6
JournalInjury
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Tibial Fractures
Tibia
Cadaver

Keywords

  • Biomechanical
  • Fracture fixation
  • Tibial plateau
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Periarticular raft constructs and fracture stability in split-depression tibial plateau fractures. / Cross, William W.; Levy, Bruce A.; Morgan, Joseph A.; Armitage, Bryan M.; Cole, Peter A.

In: Injury, Vol. 44, No. 6, 06.2013, p. 796-801.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cross, William W. ; Levy, Bruce A. ; Morgan, Joseph A. ; Armitage, Bryan M. ; Cole, Peter A. / Periarticular raft constructs and fracture stability in split-depression tibial plateau fractures. In: Injury. 2013 ; Vol. 44, No. 6. pp. 796-801.
@article{f4b30462969942f8870adb8169baf7ee,
title = "Periarticular raft constructs and fracture stability in split-depression tibial plateau fractures",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate relative fracture stability yielded by screws placed above a lateral plate, as well as locking and non-locking screws placed through a plate in a split depression tibia plateau fracture model. Methods: Cadaver tibia specimens (mean age 74.1 years) were randomised across 3 groups: Groups 1: raft-construct outside the plate, 2: non-locking raft screws through the plate, and 3: locking raft screws through the plate. Displacement of the depressed fragment was recorded with force values from 400 N to 1600 N in increasing 400 N increments. The force required to elicit lateral plateau fragment displacement of 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm was also recorded. Results: None of the mechanical testing results demonstrated statistical significance with p-values of <0.05. Cyclic testing of Groups 1, 2, and 3 at 400 N revealed displacements of 0.54 mm, 0.64 mm, and 0.48 mm, respectively. At 800 N, displacements were 1.36 mm, 1.4 mm, and 1.4 mm, respectively. At 1200 N, displacements were 2.4 mm, 1.9 mm, and 2.1 mm, respectively. At 1600 N, displacements were 2.8 mm, 2.5 mm, and 2 mm, respectively. Resistance to displacement data demonstrated the mean force required to displace the fracture 5 mm in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 250 N, 330 N, and 318 N, respectively. For 10 mm of displacement, forces required were 394 N, 515 N, and 556 N, respectively. For 15 mm of displacement, forces required were 681 N, 853 N, and 963 N, respectively. Compared to combined groups using screws through the plate, Group 1 demonstrated lower displacement ≤800 N, but demonstrated greater displacement >800 N. Group 2 demonstrated greatest resistance to plateau displacement of 5 mm compared to Group 1 or 3, while Group 3 was most resistant to greater displacement. The combined group using screws through the plate (Groups 2 + 3) was consistently more resistant than Group 1 at all levels of displacement. Conclusions: Designs utilising screws through the plate trended towards statistically significant improved stability against plateau displacement relative to utilising screws outside the plate. Our study also suggests that there is no significant benefit of locking screws over non-locking screws in this unicondylar tibia plateau fracture model.",
keywords = "Biomechanical, Fracture fixation, Tibial plateau, Trauma",
author = "Cross, {William W.} and Levy, {Bruce A.} and Morgan, {Joseph A.} and Armitage, {Bryan M.} and Cole, {Peter A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "796--801",
journal = "Injury",
issn = "0020-1383",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Periarticular raft constructs and fracture stability in split-depression tibial plateau fractures

AU - Cross, William W.

AU - Levy, Bruce A.

AU - Morgan, Joseph A.

AU - Armitage, Bryan M.

AU - Cole, Peter A.

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate relative fracture stability yielded by screws placed above a lateral plate, as well as locking and non-locking screws placed through a plate in a split depression tibia plateau fracture model. Methods: Cadaver tibia specimens (mean age 74.1 years) were randomised across 3 groups: Groups 1: raft-construct outside the plate, 2: non-locking raft screws through the plate, and 3: locking raft screws through the plate. Displacement of the depressed fragment was recorded with force values from 400 N to 1600 N in increasing 400 N increments. The force required to elicit lateral plateau fragment displacement of 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm was also recorded. Results: None of the mechanical testing results demonstrated statistical significance with p-values of <0.05. Cyclic testing of Groups 1, 2, and 3 at 400 N revealed displacements of 0.54 mm, 0.64 mm, and 0.48 mm, respectively. At 800 N, displacements were 1.36 mm, 1.4 mm, and 1.4 mm, respectively. At 1200 N, displacements were 2.4 mm, 1.9 mm, and 2.1 mm, respectively. At 1600 N, displacements were 2.8 mm, 2.5 mm, and 2 mm, respectively. Resistance to displacement data demonstrated the mean force required to displace the fracture 5 mm in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 250 N, 330 N, and 318 N, respectively. For 10 mm of displacement, forces required were 394 N, 515 N, and 556 N, respectively. For 15 mm of displacement, forces required were 681 N, 853 N, and 963 N, respectively. Compared to combined groups using screws through the plate, Group 1 demonstrated lower displacement ≤800 N, but demonstrated greater displacement >800 N. Group 2 demonstrated greatest resistance to plateau displacement of 5 mm compared to Group 1 or 3, while Group 3 was most resistant to greater displacement. The combined group using screws through the plate (Groups 2 + 3) was consistently more resistant than Group 1 at all levels of displacement. Conclusions: Designs utilising screws through the plate trended towards statistically significant improved stability against plateau displacement relative to utilising screws outside the plate. Our study also suggests that there is no significant benefit of locking screws over non-locking screws in this unicondylar tibia plateau fracture model.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate relative fracture stability yielded by screws placed above a lateral plate, as well as locking and non-locking screws placed through a plate in a split depression tibia plateau fracture model. Methods: Cadaver tibia specimens (mean age 74.1 years) were randomised across 3 groups: Groups 1: raft-construct outside the plate, 2: non-locking raft screws through the plate, and 3: locking raft screws through the plate. Displacement of the depressed fragment was recorded with force values from 400 N to 1600 N in increasing 400 N increments. The force required to elicit lateral plateau fragment displacement of 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm was also recorded. Results: None of the mechanical testing results demonstrated statistical significance with p-values of <0.05. Cyclic testing of Groups 1, 2, and 3 at 400 N revealed displacements of 0.54 mm, 0.64 mm, and 0.48 mm, respectively. At 800 N, displacements were 1.36 mm, 1.4 mm, and 1.4 mm, respectively. At 1200 N, displacements were 2.4 mm, 1.9 mm, and 2.1 mm, respectively. At 1600 N, displacements were 2.8 mm, 2.5 mm, and 2 mm, respectively. Resistance to displacement data demonstrated the mean force required to displace the fracture 5 mm in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 250 N, 330 N, and 318 N, respectively. For 10 mm of displacement, forces required were 394 N, 515 N, and 556 N, respectively. For 15 mm of displacement, forces required were 681 N, 853 N, and 963 N, respectively. Compared to combined groups using screws through the plate, Group 1 demonstrated lower displacement ≤800 N, but demonstrated greater displacement >800 N. Group 2 demonstrated greatest resistance to plateau displacement of 5 mm compared to Group 1 or 3, while Group 3 was most resistant to greater displacement. The combined group using screws through the plate (Groups 2 + 3) was consistently more resistant than Group 1 at all levels of displacement. Conclusions: Designs utilising screws through the plate trended towards statistically significant improved stability against plateau displacement relative to utilising screws outside the plate. Our study also suggests that there is no significant benefit of locking screws over non-locking screws in this unicondylar tibia plateau fracture model.

KW - Biomechanical

KW - Fracture fixation

KW - Tibial plateau

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877786649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877786649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.028

DO - 10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.028

M3 - Article

C2 - 23433659

AN - SCOPUS:84877786649

VL - 44

SP - 796

EP - 801

JO - Injury

JF - Injury

SN - 0020-1383

IS - 6

ER -