| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 916-918 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | New England Journal of Medicine |
| Volume | 312 |
| Issue number | 14 |
| State | Published - 1985 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)
Cite this
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial? / Mock, M. B.; Reeder, G. S.; Schaff, Hartzell V; Holmes, David; Vlietstra, R. E.; Smith, H. C.; Gersh, B. J.
In: New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 312, No. 14, 1985, p. 916-918.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial?
AU - Mock, M. B.
AU - Reeder, G. S.
AU - Schaff, Hartzell V
AU - Holmes, David
AU - Vlietstra, R. E.
AU - Smith, H. C.
AU - Gersh, B. J.
PY - 1985
Y1 - 1985
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022002658&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022002658&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 3156275
AN - SCOPUS:0022002658
VL - 312
SP - 916
EP - 918
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
SN - 1533-4406
IS - 14
ER -