Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial?

M. B. Mock, G. S. Reeder, Hartzell V Schaff, David Holmes, R. E. Vlietstra, H. C. Smith, B. J. Gersh

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	916-918
Number of pages	3
Journal	New England Journal of Medicine
Volume	312
Issue number	14
State	Published - 1985

ASJC Scopus subject areas

@article{bf250798c4b24e6fa5b1f5fbd89d21b9,

title = "Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial?",

author = "Mock, {M. B.} and Reeder, {G. S.} and Schaff, {Hartzell V} and David Holmes and Vlietstra, {R. E.} and Smith, {H. C.} and Gersh, {B. J.}",

year = "1985",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "312",

pages = "916--918",

journal = "New England Journal of Medicine",

issn = "1533-4406",