Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial?

M. B. Mock, G. S. Reeder, Hartzell V Schaff, David Holmes, R. E. Vlietstra, H. C. Smith, B. J. Gersh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)916-918
Number of pages3
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume312
Issue number14
StatePublished - 1985

Fingerprint

Coronary Balloon Angioplasty
Balloon Angioplasty
Random Allocation
Coronary Artery Bypass
Coronary Disease
Coronary Vessels
Clinical Trials
National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.)
Health Care Surveys
Medical Societies
Multicenter Studies
Myocardial Ischemia
Cause of Death
Delivery of Health Care
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial? / Mock, M. B.; Reeder, G. S.; Schaff, Hartzell V; Holmes, David; Vlietstra, R. E.; Smith, H. C.; Gersh, B. J.

In: New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 312, No. 14, 1985, p. 916-918.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mock, M. B. ; Reeder, G. S. ; Schaff, Hartzell V ; Holmes, David ; Vlietstra, R. E. ; Smith, H. C. ; Gersh, B. J. / Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial?. In: New England Journal of Medicine. 1985 ; Vol. 312, No. 14. pp. 916-918.
@article{bf250798c4b24e6fa5b1f5fbd89d21b9,
title = "Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial?",
author = "Mock, {M. B.} and Reeder, {G. S.} and Schaff, {Hartzell V} and David Holmes and Vlietstra, {R. E.} and Smith, {H. C.} and Gersh, {B. J.}",
year = "1985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "312",
pages = "916--918",
journal = "New England Journal of Medicine",
issn = "1533-4406",
publisher = "Massachussetts Medical Society",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial?

AU - Mock, M. B.

AU - Reeder, G. S.

AU - Schaff, Hartzell V

AU - Holmes, David

AU - Vlietstra, R. E.

AU - Smith, H. C.

AU - Gersh, B. J.

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022002658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022002658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3156275

AN - SCOPUS:0022002658

VL - 312

SP - 916

EP - 918

JO - New England Journal of Medicine

JF - New England Journal of Medicine

SN - 1533-4406

IS - 14

ER -