Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial?

M. B. Mock, G. S. Reeder, Hartzell V Schaff, David Holmes, R. E. Vlietstra, H. C. Smith, B. J. Gersh

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

23 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	916-918
Number of pages	3
Journal	New England Journal of Medicine
Volume	312
Issue number	14
State	Published - 1985

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Medicine(all)

Access to Document

Cite this

Mock, M. B., Reeder, G. S., Schaff, H. V., Holmes, D., Vlietstra, R. E., Smith, H. C., & Gersh, B. J. (1985). Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial? New England Journal of Medicine, 312(14), 916-918.

@article{bf250798c4b24e6fa5b1f5fbd89d21b9,

title = "Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial?",

author = "Mock, {M. B.} and Reeder, {G. S.} and Schaff, {Hartzell V} and David Holmes and Vlietstra, {R. E.} and Smith, {H. C.} and Gersh, {B. J.}",

year = "1985",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "312",

pages = "916--918",

journal = "New England Journal of Medicine",

issn = "1533-4406",

publisher = "Massachussetts Medical Society",

number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial?

AU - Mock, M. B.

AU - Reeder, G. S.

AU - Schaff, Hartzell V

AU - Holmes, David

AU - Vlietstra, R. E.

AU - Smith, H. C.

AU - Gersh, B. J.

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022002658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022002658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3156275

AN - SCOPUS:0022002658

VL - 312

SP - 916

EP - 918

JO - New England Journal of Medicine

JF - New England Journal of Medicine

SN - 1533-4406

IS - 14

ER -