TY - JOUR
T1 - Percutaneous Cryoablation of Solitary, Sporadic Renal Cell Carcinoma
T2 - Outcome Analysis Based on Clear-Cell versus Papillary Subtypes
AU - Haddad, Mustafa M.
AU - Schmit, Grant D.
AU - Kurup, A. Nicholas
AU - Schmitz, John J.
AU - Boorjian, Stephen A.
AU - Geske, Jennifer
AU - Thompson, R. Houston
AU - Callstrom, Matthew R.
AU - Atwell, Thomas D.
N1 - Funding Information:
A.N.K. receives grants from Galil Medical (Yokneam, Israel). S.A.B. serves on the advisory board for Astellas (Tokyo, Japan). M.R.C. receives grants from GE Healthcare (Chicago, Illinois), Thermedical (Waltham, Massachusetts), Galil Medical, and Siemens Healthcare (Forchheim, Germany); receives royalties from UpToDate (Waltham, Massachusetts); and is a paid consultant for Covidien (Dublin, Ireland), Medtronic (Dublin, Ireland), and Perseon Corporation (Salt Lake City, Utah). None of the other authors have identified a conflict of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 SIR
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate treatment outcomes with percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) based on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) histology. Methods and Materials: Patients treated with PCA for a solitary, sporadic stage T1a RCC from 2003 to 2016 were identified from a single institution's renal ablation registry. Patients with multiple tumors, history of RCC, or genetic syndromes associated with RCC (n = 60); no specific RCC subtype determined from core biopsy (n = 66); RCC subtype other than clear-cell or papillary (n = 7); or less than 3 mo of follow-up imaging (n = 5) were excluded. In total, 173 patients met study inclusion criteria. Oncologic outcomes, clinical outcomes, and complications were evaluated based on tumor subtype. Results: Of the 173 patients who underwent PCA for a stage T1a RCC, 130 (75%) had clear-cell RCC (ccRCC) and 43 (25%) had papillary RCC (pRCC). Median tumor size was 2.9 cm (range, 1.3–4.0 cm). Technically successful cryoablation was achieved in all 173 patients. Local tumor recurrence developed in 6 patients with ccRCC (4.6%), new renal tumors developed in 1 patient (0.8%), and metastatic RCC developed in 1 patient (0.8%) who also had local tumor recurrence. No patients with pRCC showed local tumor recurrence, new renal tumors, or metastatic disease. The 5-year disease-free survival rate in patients with ccRCC was 88%, compared with 100% in patients with pRCC (P =.48). Nine patients (5.2%), all with ccRCC, experienced major complications (P =.11). Conclusions: Percutaneous ablation is a viable treatment option for patients with clinical stage T1a pRCC and ccRCC. Percutaneous ablation may be a very favorable treatment strategy particularly for pRCC.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate treatment outcomes with percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) based on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) histology. Methods and Materials: Patients treated with PCA for a solitary, sporadic stage T1a RCC from 2003 to 2016 were identified from a single institution's renal ablation registry. Patients with multiple tumors, history of RCC, or genetic syndromes associated with RCC (n = 60); no specific RCC subtype determined from core biopsy (n = 66); RCC subtype other than clear-cell or papillary (n = 7); or less than 3 mo of follow-up imaging (n = 5) were excluded. In total, 173 patients met study inclusion criteria. Oncologic outcomes, clinical outcomes, and complications were evaluated based on tumor subtype. Results: Of the 173 patients who underwent PCA for a stage T1a RCC, 130 (75%) had clear-cell RCC (ccRCC) and 43 (25%) had papillary RCC (pRCC). Median tumor size was 2.9 cm (range, 1.3–4.0 cm). Technically successful cryoablation was achieved in all 173 patients. Local tumor recurrence developed in 6 patients with ccRCC (4.6%), new renal tumors developed in 1 patient (0.8%), and metastatic RCC developed in 1 patient (0.8%) who also had local tumor recurrence. No patients with pRCC showed local tumor recurrence, new renal tumors, or metastatic disease. The 5-year disease-free survival rate in patients with ccRCC was 88%, compared with 100% in patients with pRCC (P =.48). Nine patients (5.2%), all with ccRCC, experienced major complications (P =.11). Conclusions: Percutaneous ablation is a viable treatment option for patients with clinical stage T1a pRCC and ccRCC. Percutaneous ablation may be a very favorable treatment strategy particularly for pRCC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048212054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048212054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.02.029
DO - 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.02.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 29887184
AN - SCOPUS:85048212054
SN - 1051-0443
VL - 29
SP - 1122
EP - 1126
JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
IS - 8
ER -