TY - JOUR
T1 - Opioid Prescribing for Opioid-Naive Patients in Emergency Departments and Other Settings
T2 - Characteristics of Prescriptions and Association With Long-Term Use
AU - Jeffery, Molly Moore
AU - Hooten, W. Michael
AU - Hess, Erik P.
AU - Meara, Ellen R.
AU - Ross, Joseph S.
AU - Henk, Henry J.
AU - Borgundvaag, Bjug
AU - Shah, Nilay D.
AU - Bellolio, M. Fernanda
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American College of Emergency Physicians
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Study objective: We explore the emergency department (ED) contribution to prescription opioid use for opioid-naive patients by comparing the guideline concordance of ED prescriptions with those attributed to other settings and the risk of patients’ continuing long-term opioid use. Methods: We used analysis of administrative claims data (OptumLabs Data Warehouse 2009 to 2015) of opioid-naive privately insured and Medicare Advantage (aged and disabled) beneficiaries to compare characteristics of opioid prescriptions attributed to the ED with those attributed to other settings. Concordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and rate of progression to long-term opioid use are reported. Results: We identified 5.2 million opioid prescription fills that met inclusion criteria. Opioid prescriptions from the ED were more likely to adhere to CDC guidelines for dose, days’ supply, and formulation than those attributed to non-ED settings. Disabled Medicare beneficiaries were the most likely to progress to long-term use, with 13.4% of their fills resulting in long-term use compared with 6.2% of aged Medicare and 1.8% of commercial beneficiaries’ fills. Compared with patients in non-ED settings, commercial beneficiaries receiving opioid prescriptions in the ED were 46% less likely, aged Medicare patients 56% less likely, and disabled Medicare patients 58% less likely to progress to long-term opioid use. Conclusion: Compared with non-ED settings, opioid prescriptions provided to opioid-naive patients in the ED were more likely to align with CDC recommendations. They were shorter, written for lower daily doses, and less likely to be for long-acting formulations. Prescriptions from the ED are associated with a lower risk of progression to long-term use.
AB - Study objective: We explore the emergency department (ED) contribution to prescription opioid use for opioid-naive patients by comparing the guideline concordance of ED prescriptions with those attributed to other settings and the risk of patients’ continuing long-term opioid use. Methods: We used analysis of administrative claims data (OptumLabs Data Warehouse 2009 to 2015) of opioid-naive privately insured and Medicare Advantage (aged and disabled) beneficiaries to compare characteristics of opioid prescriptions attributed to the ED with those attributed to other settings. Concordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and rate of progression to long-term opioid use are reported. Results: We identified 5.2 million opioid prescription fills that met inclusion criteria. Opioid prescriptions from the ED were more likely to adhere to CDC guidelines for dose, days’ supply, and formulation than those attributed to non-ED settings. Disabled Medicare beneficiaries were the most likely to progress to long-term use, with 13.4% of their fills resulting in long-term use compared with 6.2% of aged Medicare and 1.8% of commercial beneficiaries’ fills. Compared with patients in non-ED settings, commercial beneficiaries receiving opioid prescriptions in the ED were 46% less likely, aged Medicare patients 56% less likely, and disabled Medicare patients 58% less likely to progress to long-term opioid use. Conclusion: Compared with non-ED settings, opioid prescriptions provided to opioid-naive patients in the ED were more likely to align with CDC recommendations. They were shorter, written for lower daily doses, and less likely to be for long-acting formulations. Prescriptions from the ED are associated with a lower risk of progression to long-term use.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029899284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029899284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.042
DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.042
M3 - Article
C2 - 28967517
AN - SCOPUS:85029899284
SN - 0196-0644
VL - 71
SP - 326-336.e19
JO - Annals of emergency medicine
JF - Annals of emergency medicine
IS - 3
ER -