TY - JOUR
T1 - Nuts and Bolts of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Orthopaedics
AU - Lee, Minji K.
AU - Zaniletti, Isabella
AU - Larson, Dirk R.
AU - Lewallen, David G.
AU - Berry, Daniel J.
AU - Maradit Kremers, Hilal
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) grant P30AR76312 and the American Joint Replacement Research-Collaborative (AJRR-C). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Role of the funding source: The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study, and all authors had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Funding Information:
This work was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) grant P30AR76312 and the American Joint Replacement Research-Collaborative (AJRR-C). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Role of the funding source: The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study, and all authors had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are commonly used in orthopaedic clinical practice, comparative effectiveness research (CER), and label claims. In this paper, we provide an overview of PROs, their development, validation, and use in orthopaedic research with examples and conclude with practical guidelines for researchers and reviewers. We discuss considerations for conceptual framework, validity, reliability, factor analysis, and measurement of change with Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS), as an example. We also describe advantages of instruments developed based on item response theory and statistical analyses for data collected using PRO measures. Please visit the following (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p-DtZgUHOA&t=354s) for a video that explains the highlights of the paper in practical terms.
AB - Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are commonly used in orthopaedic clinical practice, comparative effectiveness research (CER), and label claims. In this paper, we provide an overview of PROs, their development, validation, and use in orthopaedic research with examples and conclude with practical guidelines for researchers and reviewers. We discuss considerations for conceptual framework, validity, reliability, factor analysis, and measurement of change with Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS), as an example. We also describe advantages of instruments developed based on item response theory and statistical analyses for data collected using PRO measures. Please visit the following (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p-DtZgUHOA&t=354s) for a video that explains the highlights of the paper in practical terms.
KW - factor analysis
KW - function
KW - pain
KW - patient reported outcomes
KW - quality of life
KW - total joint arthroplasty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146040847&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146040847&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2022.11.011
DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2022.11.011
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36481287
AN - SCOPUS:85146040847
SN - 0883-5403
VL - 38
SP - 616
EP - 621
JO - Journal of Arthroplasty
JF - Journal of Arthroplasty
IS - 4
ER -