Non-Research-Related Physician-Industry Relationships of Radiologists in the United States

H. Benjamin Harvey, Tarik K. Alkasab, Pari V. Pandharipande, Elkan F. Halpern, Anand M. Prabhakar, Rahmi Oklu, Daniel I. Rosenthal, Joshua A. Hirsch, G. Scott Gazelle, James A. Brink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate non-research-related, physician-industry financial relationships in the United States, in 2013, as reported pursuant to the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (a provision of the Affordable Care Act). Methods In September 2014, CMS released the first five months (August 2013 to December 2013) of data disclosing physician-industry financial relationships. The frequency and value of non-research-related transfers in radiology were calculated and compared with those for 19 other specialties. Subanalyses of the frequency and value of such transfers in radiology were performed, based on state of licensure, radiologic subspecialty, nature of payment, manufacturer identity, and drug or device involved. Results A total of 7.4% (2,654 of 35,768) of radiologists from the United States had reportable non-research-related financial relationship(s) with industry during the 5-month period, the second-lowest level among the medical specialties evaluated. The average value of non-research-related transfers of value to radiologists, excluding royalties and licenses, was low ($438.71; SD: $2,912.15; median: $43.85), with <4% of radiologists receiving >$10 per month. Of all categories, that of food and beverage had the most transfers of value (86.0%; 5,655 of 6,577); royalties and licensure were associated with the greatest average value ($27,072.34; SD: $67,524.92). Although high-value relationships were rare, 57.8% (26 of 45) of radiologists who received a value >$1,000 per month held leadership positions in imaging enterprises. Conclusions Less than 4% of radiologists have non-research-related financial relationships with industry that are valued at >$10 per month, suggesting that meaningful, deleterious effects of such relationships on radiology practice, if present, are infrequent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1142-1150
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume12
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Industry
Licensure
Radiology
Physicians
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Food and Beverages
Sunlight
Medicine
Equipment and Supplies
Radiologists
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • Conflict of interest
  • ethics
  • financial relationship
  • industry interaction
  • regulation
  • Sunshine Act

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Harvey, H. B., Alkasab, T. K., Pandharipande, P. V., Halpern, E. F., Prabhakar, A. M., Oklu, R., ... Brink, J. A. (2015). Non-Research-Related Physician-Industry Relationships of Radiologists in the United States. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 12(11), 1142-1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.04.017

Non-Research-Related Physician-Industry Relationships of Radiologists in the United States. / Harvey, H. Benjamin; Alkasab, Tarik K.; Pandharipande, Pari V.; Halpern, Elkan F.; Prabhakar, Anand M.; Oklu, Rahmi; Rosenthal, Daniel I.; Hirsch, Joshua A.; Gazelle, G. Scott; Brink, James A.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 12, No. 11, 2015, p. 1142-1150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvey, HB, Alkasab, TK, Pandharipande, PV, Halpern, EF, Prabhakar, AM, Oklu, R, Rosenthal, DI, Hirsch, JA, Gazelle, GS & Brink, JA 2015, 'Non-Research-Related Physician-Industry Relationships of Radiologists in the United States', Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1142-1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.04.017
Harvey, H. Benjamin ; Alkasab, Tarik K. ; Pandharipande, Pari V. ; Halpern, Elkan F. ; Prabhakar, Anand M. ; Oklu, Rahmi ; Rosenthal, Daniel I. ; Hirsch, Joshua A. ; Gazelle, G. Scott ; Brink, James A. / Non-Research-Related Physician-Industry Relationships of Radiologists in the United States. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2015 ; Vol. 12, No. 11. pp. 1142-1150.
@article{9564e0798d7045c1b8ce360b298a41c8,
title = "Non-Research-Related Physician-Industry Relationships of Radiologists in the United States",
abstract = "Purpose To evaluate non-research-related, physician-industry financial relationships in the United States, in 2013, as reported pursuant to the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (a provision of the Affordable Care Act). Methods In September 2014, CMS released the first five months (August 2013 to December 2013) of data disclosing physician-industry financial relationships. The frequency and value of non-research-related transfers in radiology were calculated and compared with those for 19 other specialties. Subanalyses of the frequency and value of such transfers in radiology were performed, based on state of licensure, radiologic subspecialty, nature of payment, manufacturer identity, and drug or device involved. Results A total of 7.4{\%} (2,654 of 35,768) of radiologists from the United States had reportable non-research-related financial relationship(s) with industry during the 5-month period, the second-lowest level among the medical specialties evaluated. The average value of non-research-related transfers of value to radiologists, excluding royalties and licenses, was low ($438.71; SD: $2,912.15; median: $43.85), with <4{\%} of radiologists receiving >$10 per month. Of all categories, that of food and beverage had the most transfers of value (86.0{\%}; 5,655 of 6,577); royalties and licensure were associated with the greatest average value ($27,072.34; SD: $67,524.92). Although high-value relationships were rare, 57.8{\%} (26 of 45) of radiologists who received a value >$1,000 per month held leadership positions in imaging enterprises. Conclusions Less than 4{\%} of radiologists have non-research-related financial relationships with industry that are valued at >$10 per month, suggesting that meaningful, deleterious effects of such relationships on radiology practice, if present, are infrequent.",
keywords = "Conflict of interest, ethics, financial relationship, industry interaction, regulation, Sunshine Act",
author = "Harvey, {H. Benjamin} and Alkasab, {Tarik K.} and Pandharipande, {Pari V.} and Halpern, {Elkan F.} and Prabhakar, {Anand M.} and Rahmi Oklu and Rosenthal, {Daniel I.} and Hirsch, {Joshua A.} and Gazelle, {G. Scott} and Brink, {James A.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2015.04.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "1142--1150",
journal = "JACR Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-Research-Related Physician-Industry Relationships of Radiologists in the United States

AU - Harvey, H. Benjamin

AU - Alkasab, Tarik K.

AU - Pandharipande, Pari V.

AU - Halpern, Elkan F.

AU - Prabhakar, Anand M.

AU - Oklu, Rahmi

AU - Rosenthal, Daniel I.

AU - Hirsch, Joshua A.

AU - Gazelle, G. Scott

AU - Brink, James A.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose To evaluate non-research-related, physician-industry financial relationships in the United States, in 2013, as reported pursuant to the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (a provision of the Affordable Care Act). Methods In September 2014, CMS released the first five months (August 2013 to December 2013) of data disclosing physician-industry financial relationships. The frequency and value of non-research-related transfers in radiology were calculated and compared with those for 19 other specialties. Subanalyses of the frequency and value of such transfers in radiology were performed, based on state of licensure, radiologic subspecialty, nature of payment, manufacturer identity, and drug or device involved. Results A total of 7.4% (2,654 of 35,768) of radiologists from the United States had reportable non-research-related financial relationship(s) with industry during the 5-month period, the second-lowest level among the medical specialties evaluated. The average value of non-research-related transfers of value to radiologists, excluding royalties and licenses, was low ($438.71; SD: $2,912.15; median: $43.85), with <4% of radiologists receiving >$10 per month. Of all categories, that of food and beverage had the most transfers of value (86.0%; 5,655 of 6,577); royalties and licensure were associated with the greatest average value ($27,072.34; SD: $67,524.92). Although high-value relationships were rare, 57.8% (26 of 45) of radiologists who received a value >$1,000 per month held leadership positions in imaging enterprises. Conclusions Less than 4% of radiologists have non-research-related financial relationships with industry that are valued at >$10 per month, suggesting that meaningful, deleterious effects of such relationships on radiology practice, if present, are infrequent.

AB - Purpose To evaluate non-research-related, physician-industry financial relationships in the United States, in 2013, as reported pursuant to the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (a provision of the Affordable Care Act). Methods In September 2014, CMS released the first five months (August 2013 to December 2013) of data disclosing physician-industry financial relationships. The frequency and value of non-research-related transfers in radiology were calculated and compared with those for 19 other specialties. Subanalyses of the frequency and value of such transfers in radiology were performed, based on state of licensure, radiologic subspecialty, nature of payment, manufacturer identity, and drug or device involved. Results A total of 7.4% (2,654 of 35,768) of radiologists from the United States had reportable non-research-related financial relationship(s) with industry during the 5-month period, the second-lowest level among the medical specialties evaluated. The average value of non-research-related transfers of value to radiologists, excluding royalties and licenses, was low ($438.71; SD: $2,912.15; median: $43.85), with <4% of radiologists receiving >$10 per month. Of all categories, that of food and beverage had the most transfers of value (86.0%; 5,655 of 6,577); royalties and licensure were associated with the greatest average value ($27,072.34; SD: $67,524.92). Although high-value relationships were rare, 57.8% (26 of 45) of radiologists who received a value >$1,000 per month held leadership positions in imaging enterprises. Conclusions Less than 4% of radiologists have non-research-related financial relationships with industry that are valued at >$10 per month, suggesting that meaningful, deleterious effects of such relationships on radiology practice, if present, are infrequent.

KW - Conflict of interest

KW - ethics

KW - financial relationship

KW - industry interaction

KW - regulation

KW - Sunshine Act

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960797568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960797568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.04.017

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.04.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 26243797

AN - SCOPUS:84960797568

VL - 12

SP - 1142

EP - 1150

JO - JACR Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - JACR Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 11

ER -